hauahauhauh, funny, how much voltage are using now for 1700 7-7-7-20?Originally Posted by cdawall
hauahauhauh, funny, how much voltage are using now for 1700 7-7-7-20?
990FXA-UD3 | FX8350@4.7Ghz | Asus HD7870 | 2x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer 2050Mhz 8-8-8-22 | AX850W |SSD Vertex3 Max IOPS 120GB | Auzentech Forte + TAPCO-S5
EK Supreme Full-Gold | XSPC RX240 + EX120 | MCP35x | 3x Koolance Blue Led @PWM | Tygon Black 1/2 | Bitspower Compression | @ FM CM690 I
2v ish if i freeze them i can get 1700 cas 6-7-6-18 i have some ripjaws and tridents for when these die
* CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
* CPU Stepping: 1023FPWM
* CPU Frequency: 4.06GHz
* CPU vCore: 1.440
* CPU Multiplier: 13.5x
* CPU Turbo: Disabled
* CPU NB Speed: 3010MHz
* HT Ref Speed: 301 MHz
* RAM Speed: DDR3-1600
* RAM Timings: 8-8-8-24-1T
* RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
* RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
* Motherboard: ASUS M4A89GTD Pro/USB3
* Chipset/Socket: AM3, 890GX+SB850
* Cooling:Thermolab Baram
* Temps: 45C Idle / 65C Load, temp=33C
* Operating System: Windows 7
* 32/64-Bit: 32
* Stable/Suicide/Untested: Prime95 Blend 8h
Last edited by MagicSpEctRe; 07-04-2010 at 04:11 AM.
#update#
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1018CPMW
CPU Frequency: 4118 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.408V
CPU Multiplier: 20,5x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 3013 MHz
HT Ref Speed: 201 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3-1607
RAM Timings: 7-7-7-21-1T
RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
RAM vDIMM: 1.52V
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA 890FXA UD7
Chipset/Socket: AM3, 890FX + SB850
Cooling: Liquid, XSPC Rasa
Temps: 21C Idle / 39C Load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable@LinX
Last edited by cartago2202; 07-05-2010 at 11:16 PM.
nice charts, quality thread
Case-Coolermaster Cosmos S
MoBo- ASUS Crosshair IV
Graphics Card-XFX R9 280X [out for RMA] using HD5870
Hard Drive-Kingston 240Gig V300 master Seagate 160Gb slave Seagate 250Gb slave Seagate 500Gb slave Western Digital 500Gb
CPU-AMD FX-8320 5Ghz
RAM 8Gig Corshair c8
Logitech 5.1 Z5500 BOOST22
300Gb of MUSICA!!
Steam ID: alphamonkeywoman
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/933ab/
Charts updated. Talk about a busy couple of weeks. Thanks for the kind words, Monkeywoman.
@Recent Submissions: I need proof of stability (screenshot). It's not that I don't trust the people around here, but when there is proof the chart is a lot more meaningful. Until then you'll be marked as "untested".
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
So what's this I hear you taking my spot? You know your not the only one with dryice
your spot was taken on air......I just never had him update it
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=369
Last edited by chew*; 07-06-2010 at 03:10 PM.
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
Them thar's some tough words. Let's see it happen, Cap'n!
P.S. Lest you misunderstand where I'm coming from, I mean all of this in the spirit of friendly back and forth. I'm no hard core overclocker, but I did mill some "cold gear" for entertainment. Let's have some fun.
@Chew: If you want to put it in official form I'd be happy to post it for you.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Nah i'm cool.Them thar's some tough words. Let's see it happen, Cap'n!
P.S. Lest you misunderstand where I'm coming from, I mean all of this in the spirit of friendly back and forth. I'm no hard core overclocker, but I did mill some "cold gear" for entertainment. Let's have some fun.
@Chew: If you want to put it in official form I'd be happy to post it for you.I will let you guys have fun duking it out
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
good clocks is that XP though? and mines a huge 9mhz faster than i got on airyour spot was taken on air......I just never had him update it
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=369
don't worry i was just being friendly back we had a whole competition on TPU to see who could get the best clocksThem thar's some tough words. Let's see it happen, Cap'n!
P.S. Lest you misunderstand where I'm coming from, I mean all of this in the spirit of friendly back and forth. I'm no hard core overclocker, but I did mill some "cold gear" for entertainment. Let's have some fun.
@Chew: If you want to put it in official form I'd be happy to post it for you.let me get the whole marriage thing done and i will knock off what you got i am waiting on the CH4 extreme anyway
http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=122076
comp is out of date but was still fun
ah well thats no fun i want to see some 7/vista 64b numbers out of youNah i'm cool.
Last edited by cdawall; 07-06-2010 at 05:38 PM.
why would i use 64bit?good clocks is that XP though? and mines a huge 9mhz faster than i got on air
don't worry i was just being friendly back we had a whole competition on TPU to see who could get the best clocks
http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=122076
comp is out of date but was still fun
ah well thats no fun i want to see some 7/vista 64b numbers out of you
It doesn't gain anything in benches......in fact it's slower not to mention 64 bit does not hinder OC's anymore so using 64 bit does not make epeens bigger
Last edited by chew*; 07-06-2010 at 05:42 PM.
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
i could boot close to your speeds on XP 32bit instead of 7 64bit same thing happened in my little competition on TPU 32bit showed better clocking and to even the playing field it was vista/7 64bit only. so either i was doing something wrong or 64bit was hindering something....why would i use 64bit?
It doesn't gain anything in benches......in fact it's slower not to mention 64 bit does not hinder OC's anymore so using 64 bit does not make epeens bigger
back off imc and you can clock NB/cpu fine.
Unstable ram will always hinder an OC.
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
i ran 32m at these ram speeds and tried with looser timings and lower volt GSkill ripjaws...will try it out again when i get my new chip sold the setup for other reasons....on s754 again and that bugger doesn't want to break 240mhz htt
sorry if i sounded rude hydrocodone and broken wrist are kicking my ass right now
Got a few good runs over this weekend.
Suicide run of 4.6ghz @ 1.55v (1.6v real) managed cpu-z but cannot get much further. As soon as vantage starts to run it just blue screens.
4.56ghz manages a vantage run and does most other things but i do not think it's stable.
4.08 @ 1.39v stable for 24/7 operation, does 2 hour linpack tests which is good enough for me.
3.2 @ 1.275
2.4 @ 1.175
1.68 @ 0.9v
880mhz @ .8v
these seem semi stable, generally foudn that if they don't fault after 15 mins of linpack they are fairly stable.
On the hwmonitor power level @ 880mhz it's drawing 31w @ 3.2 it's 115w, and @ 4.08 it's capped at 129.08w.
Dunno if these are real or what, but they seem pretty low at the higher end... *shrugs*
Managed a cpu score of 22k with 4.5ghz in vantage.
CPU-NB speed is 2880 @ 1.25v will put some screenshots up later with some more benchmarks if people request em.
Thanks
PII x6 1090T @ 4.03ghz @ 37C Load | MSI 890FXA-GD70 | Asus EAH5870VT | Corsair Dominator GT DDR3 1600C7 | Western Digital Raptor 36gb x2 RAID 0 | Coolermaster HAF-932 | Swiftech MCP650, EK Supreme-HF, MCPRES-4 and 1/2" tubing
ok, today later or tomorow il get testing my second Thuban 1015EPMW...hope 4700 MHz as minimal
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
CPU Stepping: n/a
CPU Frequency: 3400 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.165V
CPU Multiplier: 14x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 1950 MHz
HT Ref Speed: 243 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3-1300
RAM Timings: 9-9-9-24-1T
RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
RAM vDIMM: 1.5V
Motherboard: ASUS M4A87TD EVO
Chipset/Socket: AM3, 870 + SB850
Cooling: Air (Scythe Big Shuriken)
Temps: 45C Idle / 65C Load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
That's less than two hours, wombat.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
what is up with those temps wombat?? 65c for 1.16vcore??? something seems off
LEO!!!! amd phenom II x6 1100T | gigabyte 990fxa-ud3 . . 2x2gb g.skill 2133c8 | 128gb g.skill falcon ssd sapphire ati 5850 | x-fi xtrememusic. . . samsung f4 2tb | samsung dvdrw . . corsair tx850w | windows 7 64-bit. ddc3.25 xspc restop | ek ltx | mc-tdx | BIP . . lycosa-g9-z2300 | 26" 1920x1200 lcd .
yes, i had more but back then i didnt make a screen. i can try to run it over night again.
@crazydiamond: look at my cooler. its made for small cases and not for oc. with more than 1.3v i have 80C+ after 2 mins and have to abort.
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
I have Air cooler and it wont pass 42C @ 4.2Ghz / 1,42v so there must be something wrong.
(at 3.5Ghz it was 36C at 1.40v)
990FXA-UD3 | FX8350@4.7Ghz | Asus HD7870 | 2x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer 2050Mhz 8-8-8-22 | AX850W |SSD Vertex3 Max IOPS 120GB | Auzentech Forte + TAPCO-S5
EK Supreme Full-Gold | XSPC RX240 + EX120 | MCP35x | 3x Koolance Blue Led @PWM | Tygon Black 1/2 | Bitspower Compression | @ FM CM690 I
its not about thats its an air cooler, but WHAT kind of air cooler. with a mugen 2 ill get it to 40C@load too. and maybe i should have used some better thermal grease.
http://www.planet3dnow.de/vbulletin/...#content_start
Last edited by w0mbat; 07-07-2010 at 09:16 AM.
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
ok, now its 8h & i can go to bed
x6@3.4ghz@1.165v
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
my second chip
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
CPU Stepping: 1015 EPMW
CPU Frequency: 4080 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.52V
CPU Multiplier: 20x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 2652 MHz
HT Ref Speed: 204 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3-1600+
RAM Timings: 9-9-9-24-1T
RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
RAM vDIMM: 1.6V
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA890FXA-UD5
Chipset/Socket: AM3, 890FX
Cooling: Air Box :-)
Temps: 68C Load
Operating System: Windows XP 32bit
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable LINX
for comparsion my first chip:
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE at 4300 MHz stable 1015DPMW with about 1.47V!!
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks