Quote Originally Posted by savantu View Post
All that matters is die size. That translates into $. You save some mm^2 on the core and lose on cache or the other way around, it doesn't matter if the end results are similar and one performs much better than the other.

Please explain what you mean by this, because in the end, it not only takes more space, but is slower.
grats for clearly missing the point, i even explained it to you perfectly but you decided to ignore that part of my post.

you took a discussion going over the extra die space to add the second thread per core by intel, and turned it right back into an argument about comparing companies again.