Results 1 to 25 of 52

Thread: 7 second bootracer times?!!?! post em here if u have fast storage

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    701
    Quote Originally Posted by mbreslin View Post
    @railmeat: bad link
    True statement.

    Quote Originally Posted by mbreslin View Post
    Also, 8 256gb c300: 0 issues.
    My experience just making sure people know c300s aren't bad drives, sorry if yours was bad. (I would be first in line to say they were bad if so)

    Quote Originally Posted by mbreslin View Post
    Go to intel or ocz's forums, there are complaints about all drives. You can just be unlucky, it happens.
    True statement.

    Quote Originally Posted by mbreslin View Post
    It's also very well known the marvell controller/driver is very immature and doesn't perform anything like expected, even with 6gb/s drives.
    True statement.


    Quote Originally Posted by mbreslin View Post
    Boot time is a horrible metric for judging performance. The time you spend booting is tiny compared to the time you spend actually using the computer.

    Guy #1: Nice new computer seems fast let's play a game.
    Guy #2: Yeah it's awesome let me show you this.
    Guy #1: Why are you rebooting?
    Guy #2: I want to show you how fast it boots!
    Guy #1: Who cares? Let's play a game?
    My opinion and the last parts wasn't needed, my apologies.

    I guess boot time can be a decent initial clue of single drive performance. Keep in mind if you add another drive or two and do raid 0 you may get much better actual everyday computer usage performance but your boot time is going to suffer because of the raid controller initialization. At this point boot time stops being useful in my opinion. (note: I don't think it's useful ever but it's certainly not useful when adding a raid controller)


    Discussions about money never go anywhere. I could have been saving pennies for years and finally splurged on a new computer. I could be 15 years old and have rich parents. Expensive doesn't mean the same thing to everyone. Read/Write speeds on SSDs are real numbers, "expensive" "cheap" "not worth it" are all subjective and not worth the argument.

    One more thing I should have added in my original post: I have a raid controller (2 initializations counting 9260 and ich10r) so I wouldn't really know but 6 seconds seems very fast, congrats!

    Edit: Sorry just wanted to add something:

    Quote Originally Posted by railmeat View Post
    all i do if im not working is game,im NOT benchmarker.bootracer is thee simplest way to if things are starting off right
    This is what you said in your response but it's not what you seemed to say in your OP..

    Quote Originally Posted by railmeat View Post
    download bootracer here.best program on the planet i think to let u know if your storage is on point.
    This is clearly not true because of reasons stated earlier, adding more drives in R0 increases performance yet also increases boot time so obviously lowest boot time doesn't equal best performance.
    Last edited by mbreslin; 06-14-2010 at 04:59 PM.
    slowpoke:
    mm ascension
    gigabyte x58a-ud7
    980x@4.4ghz (29x152) 1.392 vcore 24/7
    corsair dominator gt 6gb 1824mhz 7-7-7-19
    2xEVGA GTX TITAN
    os: Crucial C300 256GB 3R0 on Intel ICH10R
    storage: samsung 2tb f3
    cooling:
    loop1: mcp350>pa120.4>ek supreme hf
    loop2: mcp355>2xpa120.3>>ek nb/sb
    22x scythe s-flex "F"

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •