Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 80

Thread: [Computex 2010]Thermalright new heatsinks

  1. #51
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by Humminn55 View Post
    You really don't know about Tt's SpinQ heatsinks? It's not like they're new or anything.......

    http://www.thermaltakeusa.com/Produc...C=1148&ID=1904

    i count, 1... 2... no where near enough heatpipes, it does look really cool, but it looks like it dosnt cool really well.

    i think the best thing about these circular coolers is how well they give even airflow across all the fins. on standard towers the surface area used is like 60-70% (dont have the exact number), but its very clear when u have dust or pet hairs clogging your heatsink, but only half of it.

  2. #52
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,084
    Quote Originally Posted by Humminn55 View Post
    You really don't know about Tt's SpinQ heatsinks? It's not like they're new or anything.......
    Oh you mean those? I totally forgot about them. Not only because they're TT, but also because they weren't first with that design (surprise).
    I think Zalman was first, back in 2005. Different fan orientation, but the HS is pretty much the same. Zalman used seven heatpipes though, unlike TT.
    http://www.behardware.com/news/7373/...cnps8000a.html

  3. #53
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    640
    Quote Originally Posted by Mats View Post
    Oh you mean those? I totally forgot about them. Not only because they're TT, but also because they weren't first with that design (surprise).
    I think Zalman was first, back in 2005. Different fan orientation, but the HS is pretty much the same. Zalman used seven heatpipes though, unlike TT.
    http://www.behardware.com/news/7373/...cnps8000a.html

    No surprise, I remember the Zalman attempt at it. Rather unsuccessful.

    Was just pointing out the latest incarnation, the Tt versions, and their similarity to the Thermalright can. I'm sure there are other variations by other makers out there, too.

  4. #54
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    the first one looks like a city
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  5. #55
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    126
    Looks like Gigabyte came out first to the market with a cylindrical cooler and seems to have better execution with the fan compared to the Zalman. Also looks like Zalman never brought that prototype to production either.

    http://www.frostytech.com/articlevie...articleID=1686

  6. #56
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    I like the looks of the cylinder heatsinks.

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  7. #57
    Xtreme Mentor dengyong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    A great place again
    Posts
    2,589
    Mats avatar rules.

  8. #58
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,084
    Quote Originally Posted by dengyong View Post
    Mats avatar rules.
    Thanks! I found it when I googled "best logo ever".
    It usually makes me laugh, but sometimes I only see an oriental house and a sun.

  9. #59
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by game_matter View Post
    Oh hell, how to mount a fan onto it?
    That's what I thought
    ASUS P5K PREMIUM
    INTEL Q6600 @3.7Ghz, Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme, Silverstone FM 123
    Crucial Ballistix PC6400 @578Mhz 2*2Gb, 5-5-5-15 T2
    XFX XXX 8800 GTX 650/1550/2000
    2x Seagate 7200.11 500Gb RAID 0
    PC Power & Colling Silencer 750Watt

  10. #60
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,116
    Quote Originally Posted by prava View Post
    Because the area in which the cpu dissipates is a looooooooot smaller than the gpu and thus you need bigger dissipation area. Just think about it: a GTX480 takes around 250-300W...but its chip measures ~500mm2 and you have VRM and plenty of other parts that need to be dissipated. Instead, an i7 920 measures around 270mm2...its normal that the cpu requires quite more dissipation area, as it outputs 2-3x the heat a GPU does per mm2.
    no.

  11. #61
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    In the beautiful country Austria
    Posts
    386
    More pics http://www.pcgameshardware.de/aid,74...kuehlung/News/

    There seem to be two HR-02 designs (different fins)......

  12. #62
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    home ;)
    Posts
    41
    there's also a Thermalright Computex 2010 video on youtube:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMQtx5cLDW4

    the ones that look da best (pics taken from here) :
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by it_is_me; 06-10-2010 at 10:47 PM.
    q6600@3,6GHz|TR U120e|AsusP5K-E WiFi|6GB Corsair 8500DHX|8800GT+Auras Fridge|Zalman 600W|3,5TB|Razer Barracuda AC-1 + DA+ Lycosa|CM690|ZM-MFC2|

  13. #63
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    53
    Quote Originally Posted by Humminn55 View Post
    You really don't know about Tt's SpinQ heatsinks? It's not like they're new or anything.......
    I do my best to ignore every underperforming heatsink thermaltake slaps their LED-illuminated name on. Judging from recent cpu heatsink shootouts, there's a few decent names in this arena, with thermaltake not being worth anyone's time or cash.

    Personally, I'd like to see thermalright (or any aftermarket) heatsinks for the 5870/5970 and gtx 480 which throw the hot 'exhaust' out of the case such as the stock coolers do.

  14. #64
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    583
    Ne1 know if you can slap on 2x fans on the HR-02? If they made it truly passive aka no fan mounts, that would be RETARDED, cause I'm putting monopoly money on the fact that it will be their best performing heatsink out of Computex. I would like the Cyclone to be the best, but I'm a skeptic at this point. I just don't see that fan getting rid of the heat efficiently.

  15. #65
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron_Davis View Post
    Ne1 know if you can slap on 2x fans on the HR-02? If they made it truly passive aka no fan mounts, that would be RETARDED, cause I'm putting monopoly money on the fact that it will be their best performing heatsink out of Computex. I would like the Cyclone to be the best, but I'm a skeptic at this point. I just don't see that fan getting rid of the heat efficiently.
    the cyclone gives cold air to all sections evenly, square heatsinks have alot of surface area not being used at all, and that really thick one is going to get cool air for the first inch, and hot air for the second inch. if you had unlimited fan speed, then it comes down to just cooling the heatpipes. and given how the cyclone is shaped if u have a side panel fan right there, it should be easy to give it fresh air, instead of air passing by the gpus or vrms.

    im all for the round ones, and i think they were the next logical step

  16. #66
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    America's Finest City
    Posts
    2,078
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    So now Thermalright is copying Thermaltake? Ouch.
    Haha, thats exactly what came to mind when i saw that cooler too.
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER View Post
    I am magical.

  17. #67
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    So now every heatsink manufacturer is copying another? What's wrong with taking a terrible design and making it good and selling it?
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  18. #68
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    the skyscraper is only a prototype

    they are having trouble with the mount the guy said...not sure he actually knew what he was talking about as he didnt know the weight of any of them...we only found out after picking up the brochure next to him

    i liked it
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  19. #69
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    America's Finest City
    Posts
    2,078
    Anyone remember the OCZ prototype that supposedly used nanotubes? shame it never came out.

    http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/486
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER View Post
    I am magical.

  20. #70
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    An air cooler is only as good as its weakest link, which is in all cases the air/fin interface.
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  21. #71
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    In the beautiful country Austria
    Posts
    386
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron_Davis View Post
    Ne1 know if you can slap on 2x fans on the HR-02? If they made it truly passive aka no fan mounts, that would be RETARDED, cause I'm putting monopoly money on the fact that it will be their best performing heatsink out of Computex. I would like the Cyclone to be the best, but I'm a skeptic at this point. I just don't see that fan getting rid of the heat efficiently.
    It's possible to mount one or even two fans (if there's enough space between cooler and the rear-fan), so you don't have to worry

  22. #72
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,023
    Quote Originally Posted by Russian View Post
    Anyone remember the OCZ prototype that supposedly used nanotubes? shame it never came out.

    http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/486
    well the cheapest nanotubes I can find cost $999 per 100mg, so there was no chance in that cooler being released
    i7 920 @ 4GHz 1.25v
    GTX 470 @ 859MHz 1062mv

  23. #73
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    Quote Originally Posted by Helloworld_98 View Post
    well the cheapest nanotubes I can find cost $999 per 100mg, so there was no chance in that cooler being released
    You're wrong, but it's still expensive anyways.

    http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/material...ePage=16376687

    And I'm sure there's cheaper places to get it.
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  24. #74
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    1,910
    I like these stuff

    Intel Q9650 @500x9MHz/1,3V
    Asus Maximus II Formula @Performance Level=7
    OCZ OCZ2B1200LV4GK 4x2GB @1200MHz/5-5-5-15/1,8V
    OCZ SSD Vertex 3 120Gb
    Seagate RAID0 2x ST1000DM003
    XFX HD7970 3GB @1111MHz
    Thermaltake Xaser VI BWS
    Seasonic Platinum SS-1000XP
    M-Audio Audiophile 192
    LG W2486L
    Liquid Cooling System :
    ThermoChill PA120.3 + Coolgate 4x120
    Swiftech Apogee XT, Swiftech MCW-NBMAX Northbridge
    Watercool HeatKiller GPU-X3 79X0 Ni-Bl + HeatKiller GPU Backplate 79X0
    Laing 12V DDC-1Plus with XSPC Laing DDC Reservoir Top
    3x Scythe S-FLEX "F", 4x Scythe Gentle Typhoon "15", Scythe Kaze Master Ace 5,25''

    Apple MacBook Pro 17` Early 2011:
    CPU: Sandy Bridge Intel Core i7 2720QM
    RAM: Crucial 2x4GB DDR3 1333
    SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256 GB SSD
    HDD: ADATA Nobility NH13 1GB White
    OS: Mac OS X Mavericks

  25. #75
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    640
    Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
    You're wrong, but it's still expensive anyways.

    http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/material...ePage=16376687

    And I'm sure there's cheaper places to get it.


    I looked at their prices and since they're all quoted in micrograms and nanometers (like the Carbon nanotube array, multi-walled vertically aligned on copper wafer substrate, 100nm x 30 micrograms for $835), I don't see it being any cheaper than what was quoted, so he's NOT WRONG.
    Last edited by Movieman; 06-12-2010 at 01:38 PM.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •