Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 46 of 46

Thread: Zotac 480 AMP Review: 30W Less Power Draw!

  1. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    963
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    on a totally unrelated note, you can increase the performance of your 470 by flashing it with a 480 bios. Here you see a 1000 point difference in GPU score in Vantage Performance benchmark at the same settings. Enabled shaders?

    very intresting.... i'd love to know exactly whats going on....

    deserves a thread of its own...

  2. #27
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cairo
    Posts
    2,366
    guru3d had 16W less power Draw from the overall system ,, they added a pump and 2 120mm fans and removed the Stock cooler
    Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.8GHZ 1.28V (Core Contact Freezer)
    Asus X58 P6T
    6GB OCZ Gold DDR3-1600MHZ 8-8-8-24
    XFX HD5870
    WD 1TB Black HD
    Corsair 850TX
    Cooler Master HAF 922

  3. #28
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    2,693
    Id love to see a big round up about this: higher temps equals higher power usage.

    Like the top cards of the last 2 gens of both Nvidia and Ati.

    On water could give the biggest range in temp but would ofc be loads of work.

    now i can finally say that i watercool my PC to save the environment.
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    Groucho Marx



    i know my grammar sux so stop hitting me

  4. #29
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,260
    Quote Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post

    there is the data, linear fit is y = 1.1975x + 215.29

    basically for every °C that the card runs hotter it needs 1.2W more power to handle the exact same load
    At -196c it consumes a negative amount of power! Perpetuum mobile ftw!
    --->TeamPURE<---

  5. #30
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    1,100
    for you guys that have a wattage meter thing unplug the fan and see how much watts you save
    _________________

  6. #31
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    223
    Great review as usual! Hope I get the pennys to buy one of them, Im in love with Zotac since I buy the GTX260 AMP2.

    Beside of the great work in that review, guys, where is the problem of that cooling solution? I only see win in that Zalman, although of that mezzed fan set at 46dB, 74° at Load with that card is a really good achievement. For the other hand, I can't even figure someone with a media center case put a Fermi base vga after reading several reviews. Is kind of common sence that if you wish this card, you have some good airflow, even if you go for the reference card most if not all reviewers highly recommend a high air flow case to cool down this monsters.

    For me, is a great card, improved cooling solution, fab OC and really nice layout for u$30 more. The only con I can find is that it don't have any game included in the bundle

  7. #32
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    373
    Quote Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
    there is the data, linear fit is y = 1.1975x + 215.29

    basically for every °C that the card runs hotter it needs 1.2W more power to handle the exact same load
    That is sweet. Learn something new everyday Thanks W1zz

  8. #33
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    650
    reference design uses the almighty delta screamer, there goes the power saving..
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    TJ07BW | i7 980x | Asus RIII | 12Gb Corsair Dominator | 2xSapphire 7950 vapor-x | WD640Gb / SG1.5TB | Corsair HX1000W | 360mm TFC Rad + Swiftech GTZ + MCP655 | Dell U2711

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    There goes the notion that the stock gtx 480 design uses premium cooling. I applaude zotac for charging such a fair price too, a name brand cooler and charging only 30 dollars more.

    Sapphire can learn alot from them, charging 500 dollar extra for 2gb of extra ram and a artic cooling fan, is down right crazy.
    Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
    6gb OCZ platinum
    4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
    2*640 WD Blacks
    750GB Seagate.

  10. #35
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    362
    I just don't get why they are so expensive The review fails to put the 4870x2 in the price/stats chart on the first page. It should be there, considering it scores higher than the 480 in more than one instance. I know they are out of production, but you can still get one for 300 usd or less. Fermi is powerful, almost achieves 5970 performance, but to put the price point that close to a 5970 doesn't make sense.
    Asus Rampage Extreme x58, T.R.U.E. Copper
    I7920 SLBEJ 21 x 210, 6GB DDR3 Mushkin 1683
    Win7x64, 4870X2 Quad-fire + 240GT PhysX

    3dMark06 - 30,048 3dmark Vantage - 32,414

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  11. #36
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    223
    Quote Originally Posted by texasreefer View Post
    I just don't get why they are so expensive The review fails to put the 4870x2 in the price/stats chart on the first page. It should be there, considering it scores higher than the 480 in more than one instance. I know they are out of production, but you can still get one for 300 usd or less. Fermi is powerful, almost achieves 5970 performance, but to put the price point that close to a 5970 doesn't make sense.
    There is a u$200 gap between the GTX480 reference and the cheapper 5970. It would be almost magnificent if they cut the price at least u$25 for the GTX480, but since is the most powerful single gpu in the market and isn't so far from what a 5970 can deliver, is not a bad choice at all, despite of the power hungry fermi and the noise of the fans/blower.

    Despite of that, if you consider buying one of those in countries that have a massification of Ati's 5000 series, well, you are going to suffer a lot when paying near u$700 - u$750 for your new flamant GTX480 reference card... That's really sad

    I almost forgot. Compare this one wich is u$529 between the 5870 with 2GB that actually doesn't even make a difference from the 1GB version...
    Last edited by Pekalion; 05-27-2010 at 06:50 PM.

  12. #37
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    362
    YEah, i guess...
    Asus Rampage Extreme x58, T.R.U.E. Copper
    I7920 SLBEJ 21 x 210, 6GB DDR3 Mushkin 1683
    Win7x64, 4870X2 Quad-fire + 240GT PhysX

    3dMark06 - 30,048 3dmark Vantage - 32,414

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  13. #38
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    i think you guys are jumping the gun a little on thinking this is what can really hurt ATI, not trying to be a fanboy, but in the review it still shows the Perf/W for ATI cards is 20-30% better, and Perf/$ is only the same as the 5970, but still much worse than the 5870, and especially worse as you go more mainstream (but thats how the market is, so im not saying it should)

    if you had a choose a 480, this is no doubt the one to get, and is a massive step in the right direction.
    i think still alot of people are hoping for an external only exhaust, 3 slot cooler, to see what it can do. i know i still am.

  14. #39
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,116
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    There goes the notion that the stock gtx 480 design uses premium cooling.
    no. it obviously uses high end cooling. just because there is something bigger and cooler doesnt mean the first one wasnt good.

    the gtx 480 is the most capable stock graphics cooler ever shipped.

  15. #40
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post

    there is the data, linear fit is y = 1.1975x + 215.29

    basically for every °C that the card runs hotter it needs 1.2W more power to handle the exact same load
    awesome!

    about the 470 scoring higher with 480 bios... wtf?

  16. #41
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    Quote Originally Posted by bamtan2 View Post
    no. it obviously uses high end cooling. just because there is something bigger and cooler doesnt mean the first one wasnt good.

    the gtx 480 is the most capable stock graphics cooler ever shipped.
    Good stock air cooling doesn't mean its premium cooling and I still think the 7800 gtx 512 had a better cooler because it actually resembles real premium cooling. The point of saying it had premium cooling in the first place, was for AMD fanboys to say adding better air cooling was useless on the gtx 480 because it already used premium cooling and you should just go straight to water if you wanted to overclock it. Both have been proven wrong.

    We see a huge drop in temperature with this cooler meaning, which shows air cooling can still get substantially lower temperatures and hence the stock cooler is not premium.

    Honestly the gtx 480 is not that impressive. Sure it has alot of DT heatpipes, but it doesn't have nearly enough surface area to cool those said heatpipes. The fan would also be alot better if it blew directly over the fins like most premium air coolers instead of the current blower style fan it currently uses.
    Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
    6gb OCZ platinum
    4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
    2*640 WD Blacks
    750GB Seagate.

  17. #42
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,676
    Quote Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post

    there is the data, linear fit is y = 1.1975x + 215.29

    basically for every °C that the card runs hotter it needs 1.2W more power to handle the exact same load
    So under my SS unit the card should use heaps less power?

  18. #43
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    Quote Originally Posted by cowie View Post
    for you guys that have a wattage meter thing unplug the fan and see how much watts you save
    quotebump

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  19. #44
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    36
    30w Less for a GTX480 is kinda like saying "this nuclear bomb will give you 30% less cancer", it's still no good.

  20. #45
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,160
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    on a totally unrelated note, you can increase the performance of your 470 by flashing it with a 480 bios. Here you see a 1000 point difference in GPU score in Vantage Performance benchmark at the same settings. Enabled shaders?

    i tested the GTX480 bios on my GTX470 and donīt see a difference

    GTX 470 @ stock Bios


    GTX 470 @ 480 Bios

  21. #46
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by Chri$ch View Post
    i tested the GTX480 bios on my GTX470 and donīt see a difference
    Its most likely because of missing knowledge annihilat0r had with editing its 470 BIOS to change the default clocks. He doesn't seems to know that the clock[4] (def. 1272) has to scale ~1.05x Hotclock. So he may flashed 1577 Hotclock with clock[4] still 1272.

    On the default 480 bios he overclocked per software only wich correctly takes the given multiplier from BIOS and scales to 1656 Mhz.

    This clock[4] is extremly related to the feature test 5 in Vantage.


    So finally, flashing GTX480 BIOS to a 470 card changes exactly nothing! ;-)
    Last edited by Orbmu2k; 06-01-2010 at 01:27 PM.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •