Please read here
TBH I was unaware that this brand was anathema here. I was looking for quiet 80x15's and they fit the bill nicely at least on paper, and to my ear. Now, if these particular fans are no good (I'll obviously do more research on the subject matter now that you alerted me -thank you), all it means is that we'll either not sell these particular fans, find another more suitable offering, or not sell fans at all and present this as a convenient feature of the product. It's not cast in stone ATM.
When I designed these heatsinks, I found that adding mounting holes for 80mm fans was a nominal cost, and it added a convenient feature not available before. So why not do it? There also was a concern with the unusual thermal output of the GTX480. I could see some people installing this card in cramped unventilated quarters, and felt that this offered them an alternative to F/C block with several benefits: reducing the load in the loop, thus allowing for the use of smaller heat exchangers, maintaining low noise levels, low cost, upgradability, etc..
I haven't tested without, as I wanted to present this new option for the introduction of the heatsinks. I can certainly test without them, and use my standard 120mm blowing from the side.
No. There is not enough clearance available between inlet and outlet.
I never said nor wrote that cooling VRM's was not important, and frankly I wish you took this back, as it could not be farther from the truth.
I advocate adequacy and good engineering. These components need to be cooled. The level at which they need to be cooled is what I have been discussing.
I already mentionned in my initial post that these fans are optional.
Are they needed (required)? It truly all depends on your operating conditions.
How loud? to my ear, these particular fans are barely audible.
Defeating the purpose of watercooling: why? For any cooling solution there is a feature set that matches a certain set of needs.
Bookmarks