MMM
Page 8 of 39 FirstFirst ... 56789101118 ... LastLast
Results 176 to 200 of 954

Thread: AMD "Thuban" Core (Phenom II X6) XS Overclocking Charts

  1. #176
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    West hartford, CT
    Posts
    2,804
    Quote Originally Posted by r.p View Post
    just a quick test

    * CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
    * CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1014GPMW
    * CPU Frequency: 3976 MHz
    * CPU vCore: 1.475V
    * CPU Multiplier: 14x
    * CPU Turbo: Disabled
    * CPU NB Speed: 2556 MHz
    * HT Ref Speed: 284 MHz
    * RAM Speed: DDR3-1514
    * RAM Timings: 8-8-8-22-1T
    * RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
    * RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
    * Motherboard: ASUS M4A785TD-V EVO
    * Chipset/Socket: 785GX + SB710, AM3
    * Cooling: Air (Noctua NH-U12P)
    * Temps: 21C Idle / 52C Load
    * Operating System: Windows 7
    * 32/64-Bit: 64
    * Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable (30 min linx)

    power draw idle (c&q + c1e) 68W
    load (linx) 340W

    4GHz isn't stable atm
    hey, glad some one is testing on this mobo

    what bios are you using?

    howz the OC going? good job so far. looking to get a 1055t at 4ghz, i have a xigamatek s-1283
    FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
    Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
    G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
    MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
    OCZ ZX 850w psu
    Lian-Li Lancool K62
    Samsung 830 128g
    2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
    Win7 Home 64bit
    My Rig

  2. #177
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    'burb of Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,871
    I have that same heatsink - the HDT-S1283 - and it seems to cope okay. I'm having temp issues (60c prime loads) in a 20c ambient room at 3.8ghz and 1.38v.

  3. #178
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Sunny South Florida
    Posts
    440
    * CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
    * CPU Stepping:
    * CPU Frequency: 3900 MHz
    * CPU vCore: 1.49375V
    * CPU Multiplier: 19.5x
    * CPU Turbo: Disabled
    * CPU NB Speed: 3000 MHz
    * HT Ref Speed: 200 MHz
    * RAM Speed: DDR3-1600
    * RAM Timings: 9-9-9-24-1T
    * RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
    * RAM vDIMM: 1.50V
    * Motherboard: ASUS M4A785TD-V EVO
    * Chipset/Socket: 785GX + SB710, AM3
    * Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper 212+
    * Temps: 24c idle/54c load
    * Operating System: Windows 7
    * 32/64-Bit: 64
    * Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
    Intel System
    CPU: Intel i7 990x ES @ 4.2GHz 24/7 still kicking!
    Mobo: Foxconn BloodRage X58 P11 Bios
    Ram: Corsair Dominator 12GB DDR3
    Water Cooling: Apogee XT, MCP655-B pump, MCR220 radiator, XSPC 5.25" Bay reservoir
    Videocard: EVGA Nvidia FTW+ GTX 1060 6GB
    OS HDD: Samsung 950 Pro 512 MB M.2
    Strorage HDD: W.D. VelociRaptor 300GB
    Storage HDD: W.D. 500GB
    PSU: Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250 Watt
    Case: Cooler Master Cosmos S
    Roms: Lite On DVD Burner
    Roms: Asus Bluray Burner
    OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

  4. #179
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    ^ I'll need some kind of image or other suitable proof before marking it stable. You've been added to the list, however.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  5. #180
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    'burb of Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,871
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1175312

    * CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
    * CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1013 CDPW (I think)
    * CPU Frequency: 4004 MHz
    * CPU vCore: 1.4V
    * CPU Multiplier: 14x
    * CPU Turbo: Disabled
    * CPU NB Speed: 2288 MHz
    * HT Ref Speed: 286 MHz
    * RAM Speed: DDR3-1451
    * RAM Timings: 9-9-9-24-1T
    * RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
    * RAM vDIMM: 1.70V
    * Motherboard: MSI 890GXM-G65
    * Chipset/Socket: 890GX + SB850, AM3
    * Cooling: Xigmatek HDT-S1283 + Yate Loon Medium
    * Temps: 33c idle/54c load
    * Operating System: Windows 7
    * 32/64-Bit: 64
    * Stable/Suicide/Untested: Unstable/Suicide?

  6. #181
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    15
    Are you going to add my entry as well? I would like to think that my 8 hour y-crunch session was of some use .

  7. #182
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Added you both. I'm sorry about that Dennet--I had missed your post a couple of pages back but you're on the charts now.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  8. #183
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    35
    just a quick question, has anyone here got there hands on a 95w 1055t yet?

    i noticed they are listed on asus site under cpu support, maybe they are just OEM but ive seen one or 2 places listing them.

    HDT55TWFK6DGR

  9. #184
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,103
    PRAZ

    Nice OC on that 6.
    "AMD...Like the perfect Storm,...Everything needs to be just right"
    X555x4SuperCore@4450mhz@1.64v..........

    RYZEN 7 1800x/ ASUS ROG STRIX VEGA64/ =EK NICKEL WB, Feser THC 2x360 1x480
    X470 Gigabyte Aorus7, Patriot 3400mhz 16gb dual2x8
    SSD Samsung 970pro,,860EVO

  10. #185
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,557
    CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
    CPU Stepping: camera was dead did not write it down...will update when chip gets pulled out next
    CPU Frequency: 4571 MHz
    CPU vCore: 1.575V
    CPU Multiplier: 20.5x
    CPU Turbo: Disabled
    CPU NB Speed: 2900 MHz
    HT Ref Speed: 223 MHz
    RAM Speed: DDR3-1784
    RAM Timings: 7-8-7-21-1T
    RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
    RAM vDIMM: 1.700V
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair III Formula
    Chipset/Socket: 790FX + SB750, AM3
    Cooling: Coolermaster V10 with 4 total fans
    Temps: 35C idle (cnc) 57C load
    Operating System: Windows 7
    32/64-Bit: 64
    Stable/Suicide/Untested: Untested





  11. #186
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    cdwall: cool, think, its 1015 batch?
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  12. #187
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,467
    CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
    CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1013 CPAW
    CPU Frequency: 4215 MHz
    CPU vCore: 1.525V
    CPU Multiplier: 21x
    CPU Turbo: Disabled
    CPU NB Speed: 3010 MHz
    HT Ref Speed: 200 MHz
    RAM Speed: DDR3-1600
    RAM Timings: 7-7-7-20-1T
    RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
    RAM vDIMM: 1.7V
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    Chipset/Socket: 890FX + SB850, AM3
    Cooling: Watercooled
    Temps: 52c load
    Operating System: Windows 7
    32/64-Bit: 64
    Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable

    12 hours prime95

    Last edited by Titan7171; 05-11-2010 at 11:08 AM.
    AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
    Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
    Asus Crosshair IV Formula
    ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
    12gb Gskill 1300mhz
    HIS HD5970
    Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
    case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK

    4.61ghz water

    4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
    http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
    25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
    21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260

    Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
    Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
    Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430

    If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me

  13. #188
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,557
    Quote Originally Posted by FlanK3r View Post
    cdwall: cool, think, its 1015 batch?
    I think its a 1013 I got it on neweggs release day.



  14. #189
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    187
    My 4ghz+ requires like 1.525 or more volts... I dont know if i want to push that high.

  15. #190
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Charts updated. Praz, I can't mark you as stable without an 8+ hour stability test. 40 minutes of LinX is insufficient.

    ---

    I find it interesting that we're all using 64-bit. I've seen not a single 32-bit submission. I like that trend.
    Last edited by Particle; 05-11-2010 at 01:26 PM.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  16. #191
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Potosi, Missouri
    Posts
    2,296
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    Charts updated. Praz, I can't mark you as stable without an 8+ hour stability test. 40 minutes of LinX is insufficient.
    No problem. Remove my entries from the charts. Thanks.

    Edit: Thanks for removing my entries. This is your game and we need to play by your rules and I respect that. However, 20 passes of LinX combined with 6 instance of MemTest For Windows (500% coverage minimum), 45 loops of both FarCry2 and Warhead along with all the other benches I normally post show me more for stability then 8 hours of Prime ever will.
    Last edited by Praz; 05-11-2010 at 02:14 PM.

  17. #192
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,557
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    Charts updated. Praz, I can't mark you as stable without an 8+ hour stability test. 40 minutes of LinX is insufficient.

    ---

    I find it interesting that we're all using 64-bit. I've seen not a single 32-bit submission. I like that trend.
    these chips clock differently than the old C1/2/3 chips from phenoms past. i have never had one respond this well to added voltage and they dont seem to have a wall like even the latest C3 chips did. i honestly think i could get mine to push over 4.6-4.7ghz suicide if i can get the air cool enough. my phase should push it to 5ghz easy will post those benchmarks as they come in. great scoreboards BTW very clean looking unluckily my droid hates them



  18. #193
    XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,524
    5Ghz under single stage phase will be hard to achieve, especially with monster heat load on this 1090T @ >1.6Vcore

  19. #194
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,557
    Quote Originally Posted by Dumo View Post
    5Ghz under single stage phase will be hard to achieve, especially with monster heat load on this 1090T @ >1.6Vcore
    it doesnt put out anymore heat than a X4 did with the same vcore...its only 400mhz more for me even on a suicide it should handle that :cry: dont tell me it wont do it
    Last edited by cdawall; 05-11-2010 at 03:15 PM.



  20. #195
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Quote Originally Posted by Praz View Post
    No problem. Remove my entries from the charts. Thanks.

    Edit: Thanks for removing my entries. This is your game and we need to play by your rules and I respect that. However, 20 passes of LinX combined with 6 instance of MemTest For Windows (500% coverage minimum), 45 loops of both FarCry2 and Warhead along with all the other benches I normally post show me more for stability then 8 hours of Prime ever will.
    I didn't know you'd done all of that. I just saw a LinX shot showing 45 minutes. I'll happily accept those qualifications if you want to go back up on the chart. Please excuse me as I know I may seem the villain at times--I just want to make sure that "stable" on the chart is a reliable reference. A lot of people (not necessarily you) will claim stability if they merely manage to load Windows. It's my hope to provide a bit more statistical validity than that so that a person may look at the chart and get a real idea where their chances lie.

    Quote Originally Posted by cdawall View Post
    great scoreboards BTW very clean looking unluckily my droid hates them
    I'm glad you like them. I actually took the time to write some software that generates generic charts like that with this (and a few other) projects in mind. It's dynamic and auto-sizing which makes it nice. I also wrote some custom management software for the charts that generates images in batch and uploads them to the website. That's why chart updates are so responsive. I just edit values and click a button to make this thread up to date. It's much less work than maintainers in the past have had to do.
    Last edited by Particle; 05-11-2010 at 03:31 PM.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  21. #196
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,467
    Particle, you should change the unstable list to a suicide list, youll get alot more hits also for that than the stable list............plus its more fun

    heres mine if you change your mind

    CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
    CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1013 CPAW
    CPU Frequency: 4656 MHz
    CPU vCore: 1.68V
    CPU Multiplier: 19.5
    CPU Turbo: Disabled
    CPU NB Speed:
    HT Ref Speed: 238 MHz
    RAM Speed: DDR3-1600
    RAM Timings: 7-7-7-20-1T
    RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
    RAM vDIMM: 1.7V
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    Chipset/Socket: 890FX + SB850, AM3
    Cooling: Watercooled
    Temps: 27c load
    Operating System: Windows 7
    32/64-Bit: 64
    Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable

    Last edited by Titan7171; 05-11-2010 at 03:37 PM.
    AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
    Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
    Asus Crosshair IV Formula
    ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
    12gb Gskill 1300mhz
    HIS HD5970
    Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
    case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK

    4.61ghz water

    4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
    http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
    25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
    21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260

    Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
    Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
    Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430

    If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me

  22. #197
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    milwaukee
    Posts
    1,683
    a little OT but relating to dumo/cdawalls posts.. ive heard a lot of people talk about the heat these put out but i was always under the impression that 1.5v will put out the same watts/heat whether its 1.5v on 4 cores or 1.5v on 6 cores ive seen chew & now dumo say things that imply otherwise and im just not sure. can someone clear this up? thanks
    LEO!!!!
    amd phenom II x6 1100T | gigabyte 990fxa-ud3 . .
    2x2gb g.skill 2133c8 | 128gb g.skill falcon ssd
    sapphire ati 5850 | x-fi xtrememusic. . .
    samsung f4 2tb | samsung dvdrw . .
    corsair tx850w | windows 7 64-bit.
    ddc3.25 xspc restop | ek ltx | mc-tdx | BIP . .
    lycosa-g9-z2300 | 26" 1920x1200 lcd .

  23. #198
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    1,070
    Well Dumo and chew have taken actual temp readings with a temp probe I believe, so I would believe those guys over the BIOS.

  24. #199
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,119


    CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
    CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1015DPMW
    CPU Frequency: 4063 MHz
    CPU vCore: 1.475V
    CPU Multiplier: 13.5x CPU Turbo: Disabled
    CPU NB Speed: 2400 MHz
    CPU NB vCore: auto
    HT Ref Speed: 300 MHz
    RAM Speed: DDR3-16000
    RAM Timings: 8-8-8-24-2T
    RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
    RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
    Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV
    Chipset/Socket: 890fX + SB850, AM3
    Cooling: Water, non chilled
    Temps: 22C Idle / 41C Load
    Operating System: Windows 7
    32/64-Bit: 64
    Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
    ~1~
    AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
    GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
    Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
    AMD Radeon VII
    ~2~
    AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
    Asus Prime X399-A
    GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
    AMD RX 5700 XT

  25. #200
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,467
    Quote Originally Posted by crazydiamond View Post
    a little OT but relating to dumo/cdawalls posts.. ive heard a lot of people talk about the heat these put out but i was always under the impression that 1.5v will put out the same watts/heat whether its 1.5v on 4 cores or 1.5v on 6 cores ive seen chew & now dumo say things that imply otherwise and im just not sure. can someone clear this up? thanks
    Im under the impression that each core would get 1.5v? But im not sure......I figured thats the reason I had increased heat going from 6400x2 to x4 at the same voltage
    AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
    Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
    Asus Crosshair IV Formula
    ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
    12gb Gskill 1300mhz
    HIS HD5970
    Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
    case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK

    4.61ghz water

    4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
    http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
    25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
    21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260

    Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
    Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
    Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430

    If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me

Page 8 of 39 FirstFirst ... 56789101118 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •