Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
So what you're doing is taking the price metric, applying it where it's convenient for you, ignoring power (let's ignore everything that it's not good at), then you say it's the best for performance (erroneous).

Massaging data is great.
I am not even close to doing that, I have made it pretty clear in the past, the power consumption the gtx 480 is attrocious and piss poor and a serious draw back.

I think its rather the article itself that taking in account the price/performance ratio and applying it when it convenient. Compared to the 5970 in this case, it seems like the superior value as it offers 90 percent of the performance at 1920*1080 but at being 200 dollars cheaper and being a single chip, seems like the better card.

The writing in the article is simply poor if you look at the results in the graphs of the article.