Quote Originally Posted by JF-AMD View Post
I have to agree 100% that errata happens and we shouldn't be calling it out.

However, I do also agree that if someone is going to market their product as being "more secure" and denigrate their competitor as being "less secure", they open themselves up on things like this.
Sh... errata hapens... but what this "more secure" thing has to do with an errata? As I know "more secure" was related to a new "AES" instruction set and as I know Intel didn't labeled competitors as "less secure".