Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 72

Thread: Some benchmarks of Thuban X6 1090T

  1. #26
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    And the point is ? AMD needs a 2 cores and 200MHz advantage to match the 1 1/2 year old i7 tech 960 ?
    No matter how I try to have a look at it, I can't see any "miracles" or progress from AMD.
    Intel's closing in on faster clock-per-clock processors than Gulftown and going to 8 and 10 cores ( 16 & 20 threads ) in Nov/Dec or Jan-March 2011.
    AMD's at 12 Cores / 12 threads, but unless their performance clock per clock and on a core to core basis is the same with these, those will barely compete with the 8c/16t Intel CPU.

    They need to work harder.

    Nice performance and good prices are always nice, but they need to step up the game before they get down below ( performance-wise ).

    I'm all in for performance.
    Can we have an Opteron 146 and DFI LP nF4 SLI-DR de-javu anytime soon AMD please ?
    The point being that AMD has something that can perform on par with Intels best processors and that also with a $250 lower price tag.

    i7 950 is around $560 or some thing and i7 960 is around $580, 1090T is suppose to be $300 jeez. For $300 Intel only offers you a i7 930 or a i7 860 this will force them to release a new 3Ghz+ model or lower the prices of i7 950/960

    Other than i7 975/980x the 1090T is in a very good position, also the i7 950 was not launched in 2008 it was launched in Q4 2009.

    1090T has the unlocked multi such as the i7 965 and has the same speed with a much lower price tag how is that a bad thing and the 8 and 10 cores you mentioned they are not coming out as soon as you think.

    You will see dual cores and maybe quads, intel will again do a test phase with dual cores on a new process node.
    Coming Soon

  2. #27
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    And the point is ? AMD needs a 2 cores and 200MHz advantage to match the 1 1/2 year old i7 tech 960 ?
    No matter how I try to have a look at it, I can't see any "miracles" or progress from AMD.
    Intel's closing in on faster clock-per-clock processors than Gulftown and going to 8 and 10 cores ( 16 & 20 threads ) in Nov/Dec or Jan-March 2011.
    AMD's at 12 Cores / 12 threads, but unless their performance clock per clock and on a core to core basis is the same with these, those will barely compete with the 8c/16t Intel CPU.

    They need to work harder.

    Nice performance and good prices are always nice, but they need to step up the game before they get down below ( performance-wise ).

    I'm all in for performance.
    Can we have an Opteron 146 and DFI LP nF4 SLI-DR de-javu anytime soon AMD please ?
    To argue you switch your comparaison from i7 950 vs PII 1090T to i7 960 vs PII 1090T only to say the later have a 2 cores and 200MHz advantage...I find this funny.

    After you speak about 1 1/2 year old i7 tech 960 but you forget PII is 1 year old tech.

    After you argument using core count and thread count at your advantage. I find it a litte hyprocite.

    Ultimately to show you don't favour Intel over AMD you say 'I'm all in for performance', a way to say price/performance is irrelevant.

    So i think you'd better save words and just post i7 980X.
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  3. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    11
    I think everyone should pay close attention to "Power/Performance" rather than clock frequency & count of cores.

  4. #29
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,467
    Quote Originally Posted by Sakray View Post
    I think everyone should pay close attention to "Power/Performance" rather than clock frequency & count of cores.
    Why? 6 cores at 4.2ghz would be a good thing wouldnt it
    AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
    Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
    Asus Crosshair IV Formula
    ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
    12gb Gskill 1300mhz
    HIS HD5970
    Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
    case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK

    4.61ghz water

    4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
    http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
    25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
    21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260

    Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
    Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
    Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430

    If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me

  5. #30
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    All I see is that the i7 950 had a clockspeed of 4ghz
    ..is that stock?
    All I see is... that you need to clean your glasses or pay a visit to a doctor to have your eyesight checked, the only 4GHz thing in the screenshot is an overclocked i5 750

    Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post
    The point being that AMD has something that can perform on par with Intels best processors
    Well...it's not exactly like that, isn't it ?
    It can only battle the Bloomfields which are... well, introduced since late 2008.
    Who needs an i7 950 or 960 when most of the 920's can do 4.2GHz 24/7 on air cooling ?
    There goes the price tag difference when overclocking isn't "forbidden" or taken out of the question.

    Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post
    For $300 Intel only offers you a i7 930
    Which can match/beat the Phenom II x6 in a lot ( if not most ) cases if you simply overclock it to 4GHz or so.
    Unless AMD's x6 can clock 250MHz or so higher, granted that we'd overclock both CPUs.

    Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post
    Other than i7 975/980x the 1090T is in a very good position
    I'm tired of "if you overlook this or that" when it comes to progress.
    I want to see AMD surpassing Intel again, even if it's just 1% faster.

    Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post
    also the i7 950 was not launched in 2008 it was launched in Q4 2009.
    You know what I meant. I meant that it's an i7 920 just with a higher default clock frequency, it's not like it's any faster clock per clock or a crazy overclock untouchable by a 2008 i7 920 C1.

    Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post
    and the 8 and 10 cores you mentioned they are not coming out as soon as you think.
    I've got 2 birdies saying two different stories, I wouldn't disregard the possibility of getting released earlier

    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    So i think you'd better save words and just post i7 980X.
    All I'm going to post is:



    That was the last time AMD was at least desktop-wise in front and VERY fun to overclock and bench with.
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero

  6. #31
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Posting a super pi score in the era of multicore processors is like driving your Porsche on the narrow village road going 20Km/h... (I know yup posted it to prove how "fun" that Opty was,yet Super Pi is fail from perf. evaluation POV when you count multicore MPUs).
    Also comparing Bloomfield and Istanbul is valid since Bloomfield is still very high end with only 1 Westmere hexa core being faster. Bloomfield design relies massively on added logic(SMT aka Hyperthreading) which adds ~20% on the die size while giving similar perf. increase on average in poorly coded multithread-capable applications .Each core inside Bloomfield is MASSIVELY larger than one in Deneb/Istanbul,thing 15.3mm2 Vs 24.5mm2,that's staggering 60% more added core logic area. Deneb is actually doing great compared how much smaller its cores are.So Istanbul/Thuban with 50% more cores actually levels the field in core logic area investment .The only real downside in AMD's Deneb is quite large sram cell size and this is why Deneb and Bloomfield take up similar die size in total(while very cores in Deneb are,like i previously said 60% smaller and bound to be slower in MT applications).

    As for your wet dream of 6-10 cores on desktop let's see how that turns out.I heard not so soon.

  7. #32
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    @bench, im pretty sure this is the AMD section, and all "intel is better" flame baiting is bannable, so i wouldnt do it if i were you. the title for this thread is benchmarks for PII x6, yet all i see is bickering from the last day. not very enjoyable to read, this isnt the news section.

  8. #33
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,467
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    All I see is... that you need to clean your glasses or pay a visit to a doctor to have your eyesight checked, the only 4GHz thing in the screenshot is an overclocked i5 750



    Well...it's not exactly like that, isn't it ?
    It can only battle the Bloomfields which are... well, introduced since late 2008.
    Who needs an i7 950 or 960 when most of the 920's can do 4.2GHz 24/7 on air cooling ?
    There goes the price tag difference when overclocking isn't "forbidden" or taken out of the question.


    Which can match/beat the Phenom II x6 in a lot ( if not most ) cases if you simply overclock it to 4GHz or so.
    Unless AMD's x6 can clock 250MHz or so higher, granted that we'd overclock both CPUs.



    I'm tired of "if you overlook this or that" when it comes to progress.
    I want to see AMD surpassing Intel again, even if it's just 1% faster.



    You know what I meant. I meant that it's an i7 920 just with a higher default clock frequency, it's not like it's any faster clock per clock or a crazy overclock untouchable by a 2008 i7 920 C1.



    I've got 2 birdies saying two different stories, I wouldn't disregard the possibility of getting released earlier



    All I'm going to post is:



    That was the last time AMD was at least desktop-wise in front and VERY fun to overclock and bench with.
    Really I dont see what your point is? We know the performance of intels cpu's already. We've all seen the numbers, and guess what? , we are not interested

    This is a new release and here you are filling the thread with useless information no one wants to see or read about. You already stated you feel AMD needs to make more progress......ok, Thats not going to change the fact of what these cpu's can do. And arguing that the performance is not up to your standards compared to Intel In the AMD forums is not going to go down to well here either.

    So what are you going to do? try to convince us that we should instead all change our systems over to Intel? I mean I dont understand if we havent already what makes you think we would want to now or even care about the performance Intels cpu give? we trying to see the performance of these cpu's. Now move on if you not interested In AMD's new offering. Dont spam the thread with Intel propaganda
    AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
    Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
    Asus Crosshair IV Formula
    ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
    12gb Gskill 1300mhz
    HIS HD5970
    Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
    case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK

    4.61ghz water

    4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
    http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
    25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
    21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260

    Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
    Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
    Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430

    If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands, Friesland
    Posts
    2,244
    Doesn't beat my old q6600 @ 3.7ghz
    >i5-3570K
    >Asrock Z77E-ITX Wifi
    >Asus GTX 670 Mini
    >Cooltek Coolcube Black
    >CM Silent Pro M700
    >Crucial M4 128Gb Msata
    >Cooler Master Seidon 120M
    Hell yes its a mini-ITX gaming rig!

  10. #35
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    All I see is... that you need to clean your glasses or pay a visit to a doctor to have your eyesight checked, the only 4GHz thing in the screenshot is an overclocked i5 750


    Well...it's not exactly like that, isn't it ?
    It can only battle the Bloomfields which are... well, introduced since late 2008.
    Who needs an i7 950 or 960 when most of the 920's can do 4.2GHz 24/7 on air cooling ?
    There goes the price tag difference when overclocking isn't "forbidden" or taken out of the question.

    Which can match/beat the Phenom II x6 in a lot ( if not most ) cases if you simply overclock it to 4GHz or so.
    Unless AMD's x6 can clock 250MHz or so higher, granted that we'd overclock both CPUs.
    Sandy Bridge will come in 2011 and so will bulldozer and llano. I have been told that dual/quad cores will be out of the gate first. As far as i have heard these will be better than nehalem but not by a huge degree, so a quad llano will murder a dual sandy bridge but not a quad sandy bridge.

    Phenom II x6 can also overclock look in the other thread the Phenom II x6 already OCed to 3850Mhz
    I'm tired of "if you overlook this or that" when it comes to progress.
    I want to see AMD surpassing Intel again, even if it's just 1% faster.
    2011 is the year they may do that with bulldozer, i have been told Intel is in process of tweaking the 6/8 core sandy bridge specially for bulldozer.

    This is why 6/8 core sandy bridge will come later than the quad one.
    You know what I meant. I meant that it's an i7 920 just with a higher default clock frequency, it's not like it's any faster clock per clock or a crazy overclock untouchable by a 2008 i7 920 C1.
    Well the multi is different and as such so is the price. If we use your logic then the cheapest processor with a specific arc is same as the high end one.

    Also what is the difference between extrema editions of intel and normal ones?
    I've got 2 birdies saying two different stories, I wouldn't disregard the possibility of getting released earlier
    There is no way the 6/8 cores sandy bridge will come in Q4 2010 or Q1 2011 i have been told that the high end sandy bridge is being tweaked to perform better.

    All I'm going to post is:

    [*mg]http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=351735&thumb=false&iehack=.jpg[/img]

    That was the last time AMD was at least desktop-wise in front and VERY fun to overclock and bench with.

    Quote Originally Posted by ownage View Post
    Doesn't beat my old q6600 @ 3.7ghz


    Core 2 Q6600 @ 3.6Ghz on Win7 64bit does 4.00 in cinebench 11.5 what are you talking about?
    Last edited by ajaidev; 04-13-2010 at 05:50 AM.
    Coming Soon

  11. #36
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,467
    Quote Originally Posted by ownage View Post
    Doesn't beat my old q6600 @ 3.7ghz
    Just post the benchies.....we are all going to get Q6600's now thanks for the info
    AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
    Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
    Asus Crosshair IV Formula
    ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
    12gb Gskill 1300mhz
    HIS HD5970
    Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
    case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK

    4.61ghz water

    4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
    http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
    25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
    21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260

    Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
    Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
    Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430

    If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me

  12. #37
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands, Friesland
    Posts
    2,244
    Quote Originally Posted by Titan7171 View Post
    we are all going to get Q6600's now thanks for the info
    No I'm just a bit dissapointed in the X6, especially because I hoped it would be something.
    >i5-3570K
    >Asrock Z77E-ITX Wifi
    >Asus GTX 670 Mini
    >Cooltek Coolcube Black
    >CM Silent Pro M700
    >Crucial M4 128Gb Msata
    >Cooler Master Seidon 120M
    Hell yes its a mini-ITX gaming rig!

  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,467
    Quote Originally Posted by ownage View Post
    No I'm just a bit dissapointed in the X6, especially because I hoped it would be something.
    What exactly disapoints you? its Phenom 2 technology only with 2 more cores and more cache.......as far as we know unless theres been some changes its a 6 core 965. So I guess only people who have not been following whats going on would have expected some miracle super speed cpu.
    AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
    Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
    Asus Crosshair IV Formula
    ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
    12gb Gskill 1300mhz
    HIS HD5970
    Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
    case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK

    4.61ghz water

    4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
    http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
    25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
    21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260

    Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
    Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
    Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430

    If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me

  14. #39
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,646
    Quote Originally Posted by ownage View Post
    No I'm just a bit dissapointed in the X6, especially because I hoped it would be something.
    Yeah it is a complete failure, good call.

  15. #40
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    560
    Quote Originally Posted by ownage View Post
    No I'm just a bit dissapointed in the X6, especially because I hoped it would be something.

    No son, you're disappointed coz you're stuck with your lame q6600 LOL it's a dead end for you!!! So just cry
    Phenom Monsta - Gallery
    AMD Phenom II X6 1055T | MSI 790FX-GD70 | Dominator 1600 C8 8GB | 4770 CF | 2xWD640GB Raid0 | 2xWD1.5TB Raid1 | Corsair HX850 |Lian-Li PC-7FW
    Enzotech Luna Rev.A | 2 x MCW60 | MCP-350 | XSPC Dual DDC Res | TFC Monsta 420/360 Limited Edition


    Canon EOS 7D | EF-S 17-55 F2.8 IS | Nissin Di866 | D-Lite4 | 17" MiniSoft | 53" Midi-Octa | 7" Reflector + 20º Grid | Explorer XT SE | Crumpler 6MDH

  16. #41
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    605
    ok that's it !!

    I preordered 1090T cpu and asus crosshair mobo .
    Now can someone make the time go faster ?


    Main rig 1: Corsair Carbide 400R 4x120mm Papst 4412GL - 1x120mm Noctua NF-12P -!- PC Power&Cooling Silencer MK III 750W Semi-Passive PSU -!- Gigabyte Z97X-UD5H -!- Intel i7 4790K -!- Swiftech H220 pull 2x Papst 4412 F/2GP -!- 4x4gb Crucial Ballistix Tactical 1866Mhz CAS9 1.5V (D9PFJ) -!- 1Tb Samsung 840 EVO SSD -!- AMD RX 480 to come -!- Windows 10 pro x64 -!- Samsung S27A850D 27" + Samsung 2443BW 24" -!- Sennheiser HD590 -!- Logitech G19 -!- Microsoft Sidewinder Mouse -!- Fragpedal -!- Eaton Ellipse MAX 1500 UPS .





  17. #42
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by CrimInalA View Post
    ok that's it !!

    I preordered 1090T cpu and asus crosshair mobo .
    Now can someone make the time go faster ?
    here take these...
    dont ask what they are,
    dont tell anyone where you got them,
    and yes they are worth the price.

  18. #43
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Estonia, Tallinn
    Posts
    207

  19. #44
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    1,070

  20. #45
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    6,421
    @CrimInalAid you pre order a Crosshair IV? Or did you just order a Crosshair III Formula?

    How's this on a stock cooler?:



    Source: http://hwbot.org/community/submissio...in_17sec_181ms
    Last edited by Zeus; 04-13-2010 at 07:04 AM.
    Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z | FX 8350 | 2x4GB Trident-X 2600 C10 | 2x ATI HD5870 Crossfire | Enermax Revo 1050watt | OCZ Vertex 3 60GB | Samsung F1 1TB

    Watercooling: XSPC Raystorm | EK 5870 Delrin fullcover | TFC X-changer 480 w/ 4x Gentle Typhoon | DDC2+ Delrin top | EK 200mm res | Primochill LRT 3/8 tubing

    Case: Murdermodded TJ-07

    sub 9 sec. SPi1M 940BE 955BE 965BE 1090T

  21. #46
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    i wonder how hot it is?

  22. #47
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    1,070
    Man his NB is stock though......ok ok looks good.

  23. #48
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    All I'm going to post is:



    That was the last time AMD was at least desktop-wise in front and VERY fun to overclock and bench with.
    That was the last time I stayed up for 16 hours playing with SuperPi Overclocking has never been as much fun since, but you know I have to remove you now, right? I retired from overclocking for a year due to personal reasons but now I HAVE to have a session tonight
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  24. #49
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,176
    Edit: server doubletoast glitch.
    Last edited by Jowy Atreides; 04-13-2010 at 07:42 AM.

  25. #50
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,176
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    All I see is... that you need to clean your glasses or pay a visit to a doctor to have your eyesight checked, the only 4GHz thing in the screenshot is an overclocked i5 750
    All I see is you missing my satire on numberplay
    The bench had a 960 in it, not a 950. The only 50 was a 750.

    You need you number keys tested.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •