Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post
A 5770 CF is more powerful than a single GTX 470 and you will get higher FPS in game which support CF. As for the 3D question the Nvidia 3D Vision is more of a certificate that the game will work with the nvidia hardware in question.

ATi's approach on the other hand is a two sided one, you must understand Nvidia uses a active system for 3D display something that is both expensive and also produces good results. ATi's has its fingers in both pots active as well as passive, you can expect DDD's Stereoscopic approach to be close/above to Nvidia's system and iZ3D on the other hand is more passive and would offer less quality than either Nvidia 3D or DDD's Stereoscopic approach.

EDIT: Forgot to include a link

http://www.mtbs3d.com/index.php?opti...iews&Itemid=76

This is a good review of all the 3 systems but do not take it to seriouslly since this is of 2009 and there are bound to be improvements in both systems after 10.3.
From how you post, you make it sound like ATI has something to do with these competitors, but when I look at the website. They both just look like companies trying to sell 3d product regardless of the videocard you have.

ATI has nothing to do with these guys as all these 3d test were done on gtx 285s.