MMM
Page 21 of 31 FirstFirst ... 1118192021222324 ... LastLast
Results 501 to 525 of 759

Thread: GTX 480 and GTX 470 Reviews

  1. #501
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    I wanted them on xbitlabs
    Coming Soon

  2. #502
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bloomfield
    Posts
    1,968
    Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post
    I find this very weird


    http://en.hardspell.com/doc/enshowco...23&pageid=6891

    So with increase in resolution the ATI's card performance actually increases instead of decreasing??
    its possible with tessellation. on average 32 pixels cover a triangle and thats where evergreen runs most efficiently. if its less than that then you cant use the shading power of the gpu. at the lower res with tessellation a triangle might cover <10 pixels which kills performance. if we double the res we can increase the amount of work the pixel shaders can do instead of bogging the gpu down with culling/setting up triangles and whatnot. this is why the 480 has less advantage over 5870 at higher resolutions. that my theory at least. the data doesnt lie.

  3. #503
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,264
    Their 1280x800 numbers are flawed. A 5870 will do 50fps on the preview build of the stone giant demo as I mentioned before.
    Feedanator 7.0
    CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
    LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i

  4. #504
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    2,443
    Quote Originally Posted by Chumbucket843 View Post
    its possible with tessellation. on average 32 pixels cover a triangle and thats where evergreen runs most efficiently. if its less than that then you cant use the shading power of the gpu. at the lower res with tessellation a triangle might cover <10 pixels which kills performance. if we double the res we can increase the amount of work the pixel shaders can do instead of bogging the gpu down with culling/setting up triangles and whatnot. this is why the 480 has less advantage over 5870 at higher resolutions. that my theory at least. the data doesnt lie.
    Thanks. I was trying to figure that out myself but what you said does make sense.

  5. #505
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    America's Finest City
    Posts
    2,078
    Quote Originally Posted by insurgent View Post
    I'm wondering why there are no fermi reviews for tech report, anyone know?
    Probably politics...
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER View Post
    I am magical.

  6. #506
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by Russian View Post
    Probably politics...
    This one I would love to hear the reasoning behind. I was actually hoping for a review from them and XBit.

  7. #507
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    2,443
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    This one I would love to hear the reasoning behind. I was actually hoping for a review from them and XBit.
    It was Homeland Security that got them for hashing a terror plot using an explosives vest filled with Fermis and running into ATI headquarters and setting them off. Who knows, it might be true! Did I mention Charles is my hero?!?

    Okay, okay kidding aside.....It was aliens!

  8. #508
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Istanbul
    Posts
    606
    new review GTX 470 runs @ 775/1550/1000mhz

    http://forum.donanimhaber.com/m_38810174/tm.htm

  9. #509
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    America's Finest City
    Posts
    2,078
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    This one I would love to hear the reasoning behind. I was actually hoping for a review from them and XBit.
    I mean, you and i both know that If nvidia's PR doesn't like you or what you're doing or thinks that you'll definitely without a doubt write a bad review they probably won't sample you. That kinda politics. I don't know what the situation was for TR, but it probably had something to do with their attitude towards Nvidia or Fermi. Pure speculation.
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER View Post
    I am magical.

  10. #510
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    650
    Quote Originally Posted by kaktus1907 View Post
    new review GTX 470 runs @ 775/1550/1000mhz

    http://forum.donanimhaber.com/m_38810174/tm.htm
    so a 28% oc on a 470 equals a stock 480 that you can barely oc, maybe two oc'ed 470's in sli shouldn't be that bad :p
    Last edited by Loque; 03-30-2010 at 04:52 PM.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    TJ07BW | i7 980x | Asus RIII | 12Gb Corsair Dominator | 2xSapphire 7950 vapor-x | WD640Gb / SG1.5TB | Corsair HX1000W | 360mm TFC Rad + Swiftech GTZ + MCP655 | Dell U2711

  11. #511
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    2,443
    Quote Originally Posted by Russian View Post
    I mean, you and i both know that If nvidia's PR doesn't like you or what you're doing or thinks that you'll definitely without a doubt write a bad review they probably won't sample you. That kinda politics. I don't know what the situation was for TR, but it probably had something to do with their attitude towards Nvidia or Fermi. Pure speculation.
    Pretty much common knowledge. It's the reason why I came up with fantastical stories. Seriously though....It's aliens!

  12. #512
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by Russian View Post
    I mean, you and i both know that If nvidia's PR doesn't like you or what you're doing or thinks that you'll definitely without a doubt write a bad review they probably won't sample you. That kinda politics. I don't know what the situation was for TR, but it probably had something to do with their attitude towards Nvidia or Fermi. Pure speculation.
    That is unfortunately the same with every PR person I talk to in this industry. They all have the ability to cut you off on a whim.

    However, I don't think that's what happened since TR and XBit were front and center for the Deep Dive briefings.

  13. #513
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    650
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    TJ07BW | i7 980x | Asus RIII | 12Gb Corsair Dominator | 2xSapphire 7950 vapor-x | WD640Gb / SG1.5TB | Corsair HX1000W | 360mm TFC Rad + Swiftech GTZ + MCP655 | Dell U2711

  14. #514
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    [M] - Belgium
    Posts
    1,744
    Quote Originally Posted by insurgent View Post
    I'm wondering why there are no fermi reviews for tech report, anyone know?
    you guys should actually read TR before beginning with the crazy theories
    http://techreport.com/discussions.x/18681


    Belgium's #1 Hardware Review Site and OC-Team!

  15. #515
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,640
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    That is unfortunately the same with every PR person I talk to in this industry. They all have the ability to cut you off on a whim.

    However, I don't think that's what happened since TR and XBit were front and center for the Deep Dive briefings.
    I don't know what guys are talking about, but TR confirmed some days ago that they have cards and have done testing, it's just a matter of getting the article done.

    http://www.techreport.com/discussions.x/18681
    DFI LANParty DK 790FX-B
    Phenom II X4 955 BE (1003GPMW) @ 3.8GHz (19x200) w/1.36v
    -cooling: Scythe Mugen 2 + AC MX-2
    XFX ATI Radeon HD 5870 1024MB
    8GB PC2-6400 G.Skill @ 800MHz (1:2) 5-5-5-15 w/1.8v
    Seagate 1TB 7200.11 Barracuda
    Corsair HX620W


    Support PC gaming. Don't pirate games.

  16. #516
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247

  17. #517
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by onethreehill View Post
    Great, they have FPS over time graphs (for CoD:MW2 @ 2560x1600 only, though)! And 2GB 5870!
    And the extra GB of VRAM only seems to improve the min FPS by 1-2, that's it...
    And check the load noise levels of 2GB 5870!

    Last edited by zalbard; 03-30-2010 at 10:23 PM.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  18. #518
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    America's Finest City
    Posts
    2,078
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    That is unfortunately the same with every PR person I talk to in this industry. They all have the ability to cut you off on a whim.

    However, I don't think that's what happened since TR and XBit were front and center for the Deep Dive briefings.
    Yeah, unfortunately i wasn't there... even though Nvidia said it was Chief Editors only there were still some sites that had more than one person go.

    As for the reviews...
    Looks like a few sites were late to the Party.

    I still find it funny that our review wasn't posted even though it was posted on Launch Day.
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER View Post
    I am magical.

  19. #519
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    591
    Quote Originally Posted by onethreehill View Post
    Another reviewer who doesn't know how to review.

    http://techreport.com/articles.x/18682/9

    Look at the frametimes for the 5870 2GB vs the 5870. Clearly the 5870 2GB is at least 3-4FPS faster on average than the 1GB model, and I am being pessimistic. How they screwed this one up this badly I will never know.

    Review gets

    Ah well, good thing we have no limits on garbage bins.

  20. #520
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Pilipinas
    Posts
    445
    Quote Originally Posted by jmke View Post
    you guys should actually read TR before beginning with the crazy theories
    http://techreport.com/discussions.x/18681
    I only asked a question, no conspiracy theories, just a straight question.

    I just check the RSS feeds for reviews, I don't read every article, but thanks for the link

    edit:
    Quote Originally Posted by Russian View Post
    I still find it funny that our review wasn't posted even though it was posted on Launch Day.
    Which site?
    Last edited by insurgent; 03-31-2010 at 01:01 AM.

  21. #521
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by damha View Post
    Another reviewer who doesn't know how to review.

    http://techreport.com/articles.x/18682/9

    Look at the frametimes for the 5870 2GB vs the 5870. Clearly the 5870 2GB is at least 3-4FPS faster on average than the 1GB model, and I am being pessimistic. How they screwed this one up this badly I will never know.

    Review gets

    Ah well, good thing we have no limits on garbage bins.

    "To test, we played through this scene for 60 seconds while recording frame rates with FRAPS. This firefight is chaotic enough that there's really no hope of playing through it exactly the same way each time, although we did try the best we could. We conducted five play-throughs on each card and then reported the median of the average and minimum frame rate values from all five runs. The frame-by-frame results come from a single, representative test session."

    Consider reading the reviews.

  22. #522
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    America's Finest City
    Posts
    2,078
    Quote Originally Posted by insurgent View Post
    I only asked a question, no conspiracy theories, just a straight question.

    I just check the RSS feeds for reviews, I don't read every article, but thanks for the link

    edit:


    Which site?
    BSN*

    I just don't want to site pimp so i refrain from posting any links in here.
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER View Post
    I am magical.

  23. #523
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    494
    so what 480 suck ?

  24. #524
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,023
    Quote Originally Posted by rusty View Post
    so what 480 suck ?
    depends on your definition of 'suck'
    i7 920 @ 4GHz 1.25v
    GTX 470 @ 859MHz 1062mv

  25. #525
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Pilipinas
    Posts
    445
    Quote Originally Posted by Russian View Post
    BSN*

    I just don't want to site pimp so i refrain from posting any links in here.
    Oh, will check that later

Page 21 of 31 FirstFirst ... 1118192021222324 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •