Since the irony is lost on you guys, allow me to clarify. It's quite funny how some condemned Turbo Boost as an Intel "gimmick" designed to win benchmarks, but when AMD implemented it, everybody is drooling all over it and are actually going to cough up for cash to settle for the higher turbo on the 1095T. This is all assuming that the ONLY difference between the 1090T and the 1095T is the 100mhz extra boost when the feature kicks, since they're both supposed to be clocked at 3.2GHZ iirc?

I like the price of these processors a lot, but if the above is true, then AMD is setting a new precedent here (cough, cough) - I don't want Intel getting any ideas :p.