Results 1 to 25 of 3051

Thread: The Fermi Thread - Part 3

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,656
    96C is obviously a short peak before the fan even ramped up and for all we know the fan could be ramped up to 40% or 90% for the SS.

    Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
    3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810

    Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
    3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830

    AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
    2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
    Corsair VX450

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,264
    Quote Originally Posted by highoctane View Post
    96C is obviously a short peak before the fan even ramped up and for all we know the fan could be ramped up to 40% or 90% for the SS.

    Overclocked at 925/950 with 1.25+ voltage I find my 5870 reachs 92 or so sustained with the default fan profile ( makes its way up to 50-55% fan speed which is quite loud ) Under normal use though its at 32-40% which is bearable. The question to be asked is how loud is the 480 under normal conditions and since we can assume that the furmark result is using a stock card, how much headroom are we talking. The thing I'm least happy with is their number for power... nearly 50% more than the 5870... thats alot of extra juice / heat to cope with (especially with regards to watercooling, thats a lot more heatdump for a rad). All this said, I'm excited to see what these beasts do on a smaller process. As for what they'll do today...

    At the comment of 9k extreme on a 5870, this is accurate with a highly clocked i7 and 10.3 drivers. However the dirt 2 numbers, assuming they used the ingame benchmark AND the retail version, are off noticeably...
    Last edited by Chickenfeed; 03-26-2010 at 08:26 AM.
    Feedanator 7.0
    CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
    LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i

  3. #3
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    162
    Quote Originally Posted by olivon View Post
    reading!!

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    580
    Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post
    thanks!
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    101
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    thanks!
    I seriously hope other review sites don't force PhysX on ati cards. That's just silly.

    Also, were they using 10.3 drivers? Where are the temps/power consumption in that review?

    And another thing, those BC2 results look odd. I get higher FPS than 47 avg, regardless of map on max settings, 32 players.

    Regardless it looks like it's totally not worth it over a 5870 unless you fold. Hell, even the 5870 isn't worth it. The 5850 is king. It OC's past 5870 speeds and matches the GTX480 for nearly half the price.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,264
    Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post
    Very thorough review actually, thanks
    Feedanator 7.0
    CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
    LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •