MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 3051

Thread: The Fermi Thread - Part 3

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    896
    Won't chiphell get sued for these benchmarks if they turn out real? I mean, didn't they sign a NDA which probably means you have to pay 200k+ if you break it?

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    244
    Quote Originally Posted by Musho View Post
    Won't chiphell get sued for these benchmarks if they turn out real? I mean, didn't they sign a NDA which probably means you have to pay 200k+ if you break it?
    They signed NDA... I really dont know why they broke it...Maybe for some website traffic....

  3. #3
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    896
    Quote Originally Posted by mindfury View Post
    They signed NDA... I really dont know why they broke it...Maybe for some website traffic....
    Those NDAs usually are _very_ expensive. Surely having to pay 200k+ isn't worth it to generate some website traffic?

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Windsor, Canada
    Posts
    215
    Quote Originally Posted by Musho View Post
    Those NDAs usually are _very_ expensive. Surely having to pay 200k+ isn't worth it to generate some website traffic?
    That really does depend on how much you're getting in advertising revenue due to increased traffic right?
    My Rig:
    Motivation 2.0
    ----------------
    Check out my Build log!!!
    Motivation: Sponsored by Galaxy and Corsair

    ---------------
    Check out below for videos and reviews!!!
    Facebook Youtube Instagram Twitter

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by Musho View Post
    Won't chiphell get sued for these benchmarks if they turn out real? I mean, didn't they sign a NDA which probably means you have to pay 200k+ if you break it?
    Really? I mean really? Fermi thread part 3, thousands of irrelevant posts, someone finally post some benchmarks and you're worried about NDA.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    896
    Quote Originally Posted by mattlef View Post
    That really does depend on how much you're getting in advertising revenue due to increased traffic right?
    True, but then again, the prices you have to pay are huge. I can't really see them generating that much money just be being 6 hours earlier

    Quote Originally Posted by LesGrossman View Post
    Really? I mean really? Fermi thread part 3, thousands of irrelevant posts, someone finally post some benchmarks and you're worried about NDA.
    I'm not worried by the NDA, chiphell should be. And I'm glad we finally have some numbers to go by. I was merely wondering about the NDA. Is that such a huge deal?

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Windsor, Canada
    Posts
    215
    Quote Originally Posted by Musho View Post
    True, but then again, the prices you have to pay are huge. I can't really see them generating that much money just be being 6 hours earlier
    You'd be surprised.
    This could have all been pre-arranged with advertisers, and they're going to pay a premium for each hit to the review page. If I were chipshell, I'd arrange for special release date advertising pricing, because of the guaranteed influx of traffic. Recouping that 200k would be peanuts.
    My Rig:
    Motivation 2.0
    ----------------
    Check out my Build log!!!
    Motivation: Sponsored by Galaxy and Corsair

    ---------------
    Check out below for videos and reviews!!!
    Facebook Youtube Instagram Twitter

  8. #8
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    896
    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    Chiphell gets its cards not through nVidia but partner relationships. No real NDA, just release when it's near so to protect the partner itself.

    Oh and hello HD5870 2GB.
    Sounds logical Thanks for the explanation.

    Quote Originally Posted by mattlef View Post
    You'd be surprised.
    This could have all been pre-arranged with advertisers, and they're going to pay a premium for each hit to the review page. If I were chipshell, I'd arrange for special release date advertising pricing, because of the guaranteed influx of traffic. Recouping that 200k would be peanuts.
    I guess you're right. Adds is a powerful way of generating money. The money google generates, is for 97% by adds.

    Here's a nice video about google
    http://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/8669...e_is_eng_.html

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,656
    96C is obviously a short peak before the fan even ramped up and for all we know the fan could be ramped up to 40% or 90% for the SS.

    Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
    3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810

    Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
    3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830

    AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
    2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
    Corsair VX450

  10. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,264
    Quote Originally Posted by highoctane View Post
    96C is obviously a short peak before the fan even ramped up and for all we know the fan could be ramped up to 40% or 90% for the SS.

    Overclocked at 925/950 with 1.25+ voltage I find my 5870 reachs 92 or so sustained with the default fan profile ( makes its way up to 50-55% fan speed which is quite loud ) Under normal use though its at 32-40% which is bearable. The question to be asked is how loud is the 480 under normal conditions and since we can assume that the furmark result is using a stock card, how much headroom are we talking. The thing I'm least happy with is their number for power... nearly 50% more than the 5870... thats alot of extra juice / heat to cope with (especially with regards to watercooling, thats a lot more heatdump for a rad). All this said, I'm excited to see what these beasts do on a smaller process. As for what they'll do today...

    At the comment of 9k extreme on a 5870, this is accurate with a highly clocked i7 and 10.3 drivers. However the dirt 2 numbers, assuming they used the ingame benchmark AND the retail version, are off noticeably...
    Last edited by Chickenfeed; 03-26-2010 at 08:26 AM.
    Feedanator 7.0
    CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
    LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •