MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 213

Thread: Best performing/value SSD or duo, at 40-100GB?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    685
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveRo View Post
    x25-e has competition now from sandforce-1500 based drives? maybe.
    best value in a sandforce-1500 is probably owc 50 but at almost twice the cost of the x25-v.
    Actually I've heard the 50GB is the worst value of the SF-1500 drives in terms of $/GB.
    It wasn't initially but OWC raised the price slightly on it...
    But that doesn't mean I'm gunna jump to a 100GB SF-1500, I just don't need that kinda space.
    And all fairness one should be comparing the mercury and x25-m, should they not?
    Last edited by jalyst; 03-26-2010 at 02:48 AM.

  2. #2
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029
    Quote Originally Posted by jalyst View Post
    but in all fairness one should be comparing the mercury and x25-m, should they not?
    or any sandforce-1500 against the x25-e? -

    http://www.anandtech.com/bench/default.aspx?b=68&c=2

  3. #3
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,597
    Steve, the Sandforce looks better on paper; however performance in the field is looking really bad if the numerous reports form end users are to be believed. I’ve not seen one person rave about these drives; in fact it’s just the opposite.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,597
    Quote Originally Posted by jalyst View Post
    Anandtech's "performance in the field" looked pretty good.
    Any sources you can recall? Thanks
    You pointed one out above. Check out OCZ's forum. Anandtech made a very specific point about long term performance. It's a gamble. So far the gamble does not seem to be paying off.

    These drives are very different to other SSD's. Compression and lower quality nand due to better error correction.....

    I'm not trying to pursued either way, just point out the facts. It would be good if someone on this forum got one so it could be better evaluated.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    685
    We're getting close to when the vertex 2 should be released now anyway aren't we?
    It's a 50GB SF-1500 (or is it SF-1200) and will prolly be notably cheaper...

    Quote Originally Posted by audienceofone View Post
    You pointed one out above. Check out OCZ's forum. Anandtech made a very specific point about long term performance. It's a gamble. So far the gamble does not seem to be paying off.

    These drives are very different to other SSD's. Compression and lower quality nand due to better error correction.....

    I'm not trying to pursued either way, just point out the facts. It would be good if someone on this forum got one so it could be better evaluated.
    Oh yeah I'm well aware of the points anandtech made...
    But I've not yet seen a huge body of anecdotal evidence to suggest they're not holding-up LT, hence why I asked.
    Last edited by jalyst; 03-26-2010 at 08:21 AM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •