Vantage and Crysis seem to be the worst apps for Fermi.Originally Posted by K404
Vantage and Crysis seem to be the worst apps for Fermi.
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
As opposed of G200
But that P-score is about 33% higher than the score posted by jared a few pages ago (14992)
Because he used Physx in this run, I think. Not sure if he used it in the previous run as well, haven't seen that screenshot.As opposed of G200
But that P-score is about 33% higher than the score posted by jared a few pages ago (14992)
Physx doesn't do anything to the pscore i don't think. I could be mistaken though?
|| 2500K @ 5GHz 1 thread, 4.8 2 threads, 4.7 3, 4.6 4 1.284V ||
|| P8P67-M Pro || 8GB @ 2133MHz ||
|| 5850 @ 1000/1225 || XFX 650W || Silverstone FT03B ||
|| 37" LCD TV || CM Hyper 212+ || Samsung 2.1 Soundbar ||
I doesn't? Oh, my mistake then. I always thought it did, and that that was the reason they banned Physx enabled results from the ORB.
The end of the world is approaching... get readySo funny, ATI is dominating in Vantage and Crysis, which used to run way better in nVidia hardware, while nVidia is dominating in DIRT and Battleforge, which are "ATI's" games.
You're right, previous scores are way too low to have physx enabled.
It indeed does change a lot.
No physx
Physx On
GPU score is higher on first image, but P-score is lower due to physx.
Pretty sure it adds a couple thousand...
@Musho :
banned from orb? don't you mean banned from hwbot?
System 1 (mine):
CPU: i7 920 D0 stable at 4.0 GHz cooled by Scythe Mugen 2000
GPU: PowerColor HD5850 (950/1250 1.2V)
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 Memory: 6GB DDR3 GeiL @ 1528 MHz
System 2 (gf's):
CPU: i7 920 D0 currently at 4.2 GHz cooled by Noctua NH-D14 (needs more tweaking/testing)
GPU: Club3D HD5850 (awaiting OC)
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R Memory: 6GB DDR3 Corsair @ 1600 MHz
So funny, ATI is dominating in Vantage and Crysis, which used to run way better in nVidia hardware, while nVidia is dominating in DIRT and Battleforge, which are "ATI's" games.
where do you see domination in dirt ? actually that is the game where 480 and 5870 are very close AvsP should be right and thats according to nvidias own benchSo funny, ATI is dominating in Vantage and Crysis, which used to run way better in nVidia hardware, while nVidia is dominating in DIRT and Battleforge, which are "ATI's" games.
You need some reading skills....
lol what ?You need some reading skills....
indeed i've notest the same...So funny, ATI is dominating in Vantage and Crysis, which used to run way better in nVidia hardware, while nVidia is dominating in DIRT and Battleforge, which are "ATI's" games.
i play better DIRT2 with GTX280 than 5970 isn't that something weird?
SILVERSTONE TJ07 . ASUS RAMPAGE EXTREME . INTEL C2D E8600@ Q822A435 . 6GB CELLSHOCK PC3 15000 . EVGA GTX 285 . WD VELOCIRAPTOR 300HLFS . WD AAKS 640GB ''RAID0 . CORSAIR HX 1000W . X-Fi FATAL1TY TITANIUM . LOGITECH WAVE . G9 LASER . Z5500 . DELL ULTRASHARP 2047WFP
Aquaero VFD . Enzotech revA . Laing DDC 12v . Black Ice GTS-Lite 360 . Swiftech Mcres Micro . 3/8"
By MrHydes®
sales feedback Techzone
whats next 8800 being better in dirt
Bookmarks