24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V
The point is this; after all this time THIS is the best they can do? Really? Really? A half assed card that has to be harvested because the yields still blow after 3 respins. You gotta be kidding me; even the RV520 and R600 weren't this bad, neither was the NV30 for that matter; at least they could be binned for a full part!
Also ffs about the 8800GT; Ok Fine its 112 shaders and was harvested down from 128; fair enough. That said it was also single slot and didn'tout wattage like fat-bastard on a burrito binge as Fermi appears to do. If a 480 part is the best that nvidia can do then god help them when Hecatoncheres comes out this summer.
Last edited by Sentential; 03-19-2010 at 12:15 PM.
NZXT Tempest | Corsair 1000W
Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Intel i7 2500K Corsair H100
PNY GTX 470 SLi (700 / 1400 / 1731 / 950mv)
Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Kingston HyperX PC3-10700 (4x4096MB)(9-9-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)
Heatware: 13-0-0
i dont think you really care about the shaders...
think about it, if a gtx480 would be as fast or faster than a 5970, would you be complaining about parts of the gpu being broken or disabled? i dont think so... people will complain about disabled shader cores, slow memory clocks, high tdps... but what they are really miffed about is the performance which is lower than expected... cause its lower than what nvidia claimed and made everybody expect...
NZXT Tempest | Corsair 1000W
Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Intel i7 2500K Corsair H100
PNY GTX 470 SLi (700 / 1400 / 1731 / 950mv)
Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Kingston HyperX PC3-10700 (4x4096MB)(9-9-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)
Heatware: 13-0-0
Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810
Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830
AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
Corsair VX450
Good luck in getting anything without at least one transistor dinked on it. That's why some things are tested and cherry picked for certain applications. The things with the least dings gets the most dollars. Nvidia made a really big chip. It is damn impossible under the current tech to not have dinked transistors.
how do you define broken then? there is spare logic in almost every chip nowadays, and its broken in quite some... yet the chip remains fully functional. so is that broken or not? and who says the gtx480 chips with 480 sps are broken? its very likely that the sps on at least some of them are fully functional, they just run too hot or require too high volts to clock high, or they clock really low no matter how much volts you feed them... would you prefer a chip with all sps enabled but much lower clocks and even higher tdps? when it comes to asics there isnt really fully functional and broken, theres no hard seperation between the two...
imo broken for an asic refers to logic errors, ie the logic doesnt process data properly in some scenarios... thats broken... a chip with disabled units is not broken... it has A broken block or A block that performs below specs, but its not broken... and most chips these days are sold with at least some logic disabled in their volume skus, and not because they are broken, but because mfcs want to differentiate their skus from one another. most entry level and mainstream chips have cache, cores or some extra logic disabled, even thought it works fine. are those broken as well?
dont think too much about this, in the end, it doesnt matter anyways...
well, not to us... it matters for analysts and for nvidia themselves, cause it means less highend parts and lower asps...
and its not like ati COULD produce such a massive chip with good yields and nvidia cant... just take it for what it is, and judge it for what it is... who cares if it has 1024 sps and half are disabled? if you cant enable them, then what difference does it make... whether they are broken, or just disabled for some other reason... whats the difference?
whats up with those wild tdp rumors?
nvidia spreading bs again to confuse everybody?
the 480s tdp is rumored to be between 225W to 300W
the 470s tdp is rumored to be between 215W to 250W
or maybe the 300W figure is for the 480 ultra with everything enabled and the 250W is for the 480 sp one?
and still no new benchmarks of the 480?
its less than a week to the launch...
Last edited by saaya; 03-20-2010 at 01:49 AM.
I think that after 6 months Nvidia will make a big surprise with GTX 470/480 and in a good way...NDA is very severe because of that...
It seems that TDP will be 215W for 470 and 250W fot GTX 480 not so scary and epic fail...
And also it seems that until 6 april the stock will be very low...almost inexistent...and the cards will be overpriced by sellers in some countrys like Romania.![]()
Last edited by xdan; 03-20-2010 at 02:16 AM.
i5 2500K@ 4.5Ghz
Asrock P67 PRO3![]()
P55 PRO & i5 750
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966385
239 BCKL validation on cold air
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966536
Almost 5hgz , air.
wow... the past 6 months of waiting wasnt enough for you?
you want to wait and hope for a miracle for another 6 months?
man, you sure have a lot of faith... i hope nvidia knows how lucky they are to have you as one of their customers
yeah perf looks to be about the same as 5800s, but if you ask me, that in itself is quite a surprise considering how much bigger gf100 is... it has more bandwidth, more texturing power, more shader power, more tesselation power, more everything... but its barely faster. that doesnt mean its bad though, the performance is very good and more than enough for most people. its just really unefficient from the looks of it...
about the tdp... not that bad?
depends on how much power the cards consume... if its close to their tdps, then its very bad... it would mean that a 470 consumes as much as a gtx295 but performs notably worse. the last single gpu card that consumed that much power (200W) was the 2900xt...
btw, check this out!
it looks like at least one person was caught in the steam hardware survey with a gtx480, so it shows up in the stats now
![]()
I just wanted to reply to you guys, to explain
In Crysis the US Team Plays against a North Korean team, this was the intended 'Pun'
answer as above, and also i woke up years ago, to Bigotry and racism, i have also traveled the planet to many differant cultures and races. and loved them all.
so please dont tar me with the Racist brush
if i was truly racist, the wonderful mods would have locked me out for it, thankfully they have the wisdom to spot real trouble and racism.
i am of course neither
what happens in your country as regards to the segregation of asians, troubles me if true, but then again so do children starving in africa.
thank you for your support Golden Tiger, you are correct in seeing i am not a racist and i have never been.
the problem lies herein (in bold) our perception of racism (but this is not the place to discuss it.)
so thank you i just thought i would explain a little
back on topic
now we have voltage tweak on a supposedly bad overclocking card that runs like a furnace? this should be fun for the air guys out there, i expect a few RMA's lol
lucky im on water![]()
Bookmarks