Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
Good? Wow, you're clearly funnier than Charlie. Congrats!
Let me tell you what's proper good execution:

Enthusiast, Highend, Mid-high, midrange, midrange OEM, low-mid (and its OEM), lowend parts ALL in 6 months when the process is ing up. Oh, and 3 months before the competitor's highend part even shows up.

If the base architecture was SO scaleable why are they struggling to get ANY part out? Suuuuuuuuuuuure, big GPUs are "ing hard to build" according to nVidia, but smaller Fermis are NOT big GPUs.

They're much smaller, so why are they ed up too?

Every GPU architecture is scalable. But in reality it seems ATI has way less problems scaling their designs up OR down.
Who the hell said GF108 is bad too? Like I said, it would be foolish to advance to low end parts before the high end is finished. No one does that! And for you smart ass:

GF100 is done in clusters as you know. If GF108 is one part of those clusters, in this scalable architecture, and if the clusters have/had problems in GF100, do you think it would make sence to advance for GF108??

But Ill stop feed the trolls, anyway. /Ignore