Page 107 of 109 FirstFirst ... 75797104105106107108109 LastLast
Results 2,651 to 2,675 of 2723

Thread: The GT300/Fermi Thread - Part 2!

  1. #2651
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    225
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    What does Charlie know about the architecture that he can say it's the architecture that is botched and causing all the problems ? Maybe it just needs more time to be designed efficiently. If Nvidia engineers made a decision to go some way, well it can be the wrong way to go, but it can't be so bad as to not allow for the development of a decent graphics chip.

    After all he had put the GF100's at the WORST possible light, saying that they are broken and completely unmanufacturable, but here is Nvidia (or TSMC), actually manufacturing the chips. Nothing can be THAT bad.
    Notice the little "(im playing devils advocate here :p)".. Im far from being a Charlie Zealot.. On the contrary

  2. #2652
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    244
    GTX4X0 3Dmark06 benchmark leak:


    http://www1.uwants.com/viewthread.php?tid=9547178
    Last edited by mindfury; 03-15-2010 at 07:01 AM.

  3. #2653
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    1600mhz memory?

    Means little with 0mhz core, though :p
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  4. #2654
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    30
    Hummmm

    The GPU-Z now will display GPC Clock or ROPs Clock in the "GPU Core Clock"?

  5. #2655
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    427
    Rumors...
    Code:
     470  480  480U  GTX
     448  480  512   Cuda Cores
      56   60   64   TMUs
      40   48   48   ROPs
    1280 1536 1536   MiB
     320  384  384   Bit GDDR5
     225  250  270   Watt TDP
    So it seems Nvidia did reduce the TDP. It's 250W for the version with 480 cuda cores.

  6. #2656
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    Where are these rumors from ?

    I don't think they are correct. TDP difference should be more between 470 and 480.
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  7. #2657
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    64
    gpu temprature 34c and the fan in 79%??? wtf?
    Nvidia's Fermi GTX480 is broken and unfixable,Hot, slow, late and unmanufacturable
    As we have been saying since last May, Fermi GF100 is the wrong chip, made the wrong way, for the wrong reasons.
    by Charlie Demerjian

  8. #2658
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    580
    Quote Originally Posted by mindfury View Post
    is it GTX470 or GTX480?

  9. #2659
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    244
    Quote Originally Posted by -Sweeper_ View Post
    is it GTX470 or GTX480?
    Unknown....

  10. #2660
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    80
    Quote Originally Posted by -Sweeper_ View Post
    is it GTX470 or GTX480?
    480

    GTX4803DMark2006.jpg
    Q6600 (400x9) 2GB DDR2-1000 Asus P5K-E WIFI 2xRadeon HD 4850

  11. #2661
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    Quote Originally Posted by Marios View Post
    Rumors...
    Code:
     470  480  480U  GTX
     448  480  512   Cuda Cores
      56   60   64   TMUs
      40   48   48   ROPs
    1280 1536 1536   MiB
     320  384  384   Bit GDDR5
     225  250  270   Watt TDP
    So it seems Nvidia did reduce the TDP. It's 250W for the version with 480 cuda cores.


    Those TDP looks mighty small special considering that overclocked 480's are suppose to be 305W.
    Coming Soon

  12. #2662
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    241
    The bad thing is its SLI score not single card.
    .:. Obsidian 750D .:. i7 5960X .:. EVGA Titan .:. G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4 32GB .:. CORSAIR HX850i .:. Asus X99-DELUXE .:. Crucial M4 SSD 512GB .:.

  13. #2663
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cairo
    Posts
    2,366
    Quote Originally Posted by mao5 View Post
    480

    GTX4803DMark2006.jpg
    No way that the 480 will come with 800MHZ memory effective clock ,, and it shows 512 Core
    Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.8GHZ 1.28V (Core Contact Freezer)
    Asus X58 P6T
    6GB OCZ Gold DDR3-1600MHZ 8-8-8-24
    XFX HD5870
    WD 1TB Black HD
    Corsair 850TX
    Cooler Master HAF 922

  14. #2664
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    427
    Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post


    Those TDP looks mighty small special considering that overclocked 480's are suppose to be 305W.
    Overclocked version?

  15. #2665
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    Quote Originally Posted by -=DVS=- View Post
    The bad thing is its SLI score not single card.
    Actually 3DMark06 does not work very well with CF config's, my pal has 5870 CF and together score around 204xx and a single card scores around 19xxx at 1920*1200.

    If this is dual SLi i am a bit impressed and if Nvidia is not using any dirty tricks.

    Quote Originally Posted by Marios View Post
    Overclocked version?
    http://vr-zone.com/forums/580572/one...umes-305w.html
    Coming Soon

  16. #2666
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    According to those news (which have all originated from a DH article) the GTX 480 will be 298W TDP in its stock version
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  17. #2667
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    241
    Edit: Actually it might be single card , CPUZ and GPUZ display single and multi cards differently.
    Last edited by -=DVS=-; 03-15-2010 at 08:52 AM.
    .:. Obsidian 750D .:. i7 5960X .:. EVGA Titan .:. G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4 32GB .:. CORSAIR HX850i .:. Asus X99-DELUXE .:. Crucial M4 SSD 512GB .:.

  18. #2668
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Does anyone have a 5870 that can run that 3dmark 06 pro benchmark, so that we may make a comparison? (stock 5870, 4.2ghz i7, 1920x1200, features tests) Thanks.
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  19. #2669
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    According to overclockers club (not my favorite review site ...), a 5870 with 3GHz 920 scores around 20000 pts.

    But this site isn't top reliablity IMHO ...

  20. #2670
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Burbank, CA
    Posts
    563
    Who cares about 3dmark06, i dont play 3dmark06, lets see some Battlefield Bad Company 2 benchies, since its the hottest game right now, lets see some DX11 comparison's with 5870
    Intel Core i7 4770K @ 4.6ghz| Corsair H100i | MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming Edition | 16GB Corsair Vengeance @ 2.4GHZ | eVGA GTX 780 | Creative Sound Blaster ZxR | Samsung 500GB SSD/4TB Storage | LG 14X BLu-Ray Burner | Corsair HX1050 | Corsair Air 540 | Asus VG248QE 144HZ Monitor

  21. #2671
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    811
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    Does anyone have a 5870 that can run that 3dmark 06 pro benchmark, so that we may make a comparison? (stock 5870, 4.2ghz i7, 1920x1200, features tests) Thanks.
    I don't have a 5870 but this might help...






    EDIT: I noticed only now that the test is at 1920x1200 wtf??? Either too much speed to be true or the video card is a BLAST!
    Last edited by NaMcO; 03-15-2010 at 09:30 AM.
    ASUS Sabertooth P67B3· nVidia GTX580 1536MB PhysX · Intel Core i7 2600K 4.5GHz · Corsair TX850W · Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
    8GB GSKill Sniper PC3-16000 7-8-7 · OCZ Agility3 SSD 240GB + Intel 320 SSD 160GB + Samsung F3 2TB + WD 640AAKS 640GB · Corsair 650D · DELL U2711 27"

  22. #2672
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,264
    Here you go. I will try to get this thing running with turbo and HT but I've always ran without (so far It appears I'll need over .75v more just for HT and 200Hz, not worth it... anyways) as appart from benching and AV work, its pointless ( I am a gamer not a bencher )

    This was ran with the system in my sig ( same clocks / relavent info ) using Catalyst 10.3 previews.



    Look at the feature test numbers that are visible... quite interesting.
    Feedanator 7.0
    CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
    LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i

  23. #2673
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    @ Namco and Chickenfeed: Thanks!
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  24. #2674
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038
    @ mindfury = VANTAGE Please !

  25. #2675
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    @NaMcO : Resolution is 1920X1080 on mindfury's link.

    I'm not really sure that GPU-Z 0.3.9 supports Fermi's models though ... W1zzard, a comment, maybe ?

    edit : Thanks Chickenfeed
    Last edited by Olivon; 03-15-2010 at 09:38 AM.

Page 107 of 109 FirstFirst ... 75797104105106107108109 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •