Quote Originally Posted by Picao84 View Post
Well if Charlie is right and the architecture is broken (playing devils advocate here :p), would a B1 improve things that much?
What does Charlie know about the architecture that he can say it's the architecture that is botched and causing all the problems ? Maybe it just needs more time to be designed efficiently. If Nvidia engineers made a decision to go some way, well it can be the wrong way to go, but it can't be so bad as to not allow for the development of a decent graphics chip.

After all he had put the GF100's at the WORST possible light, saying that they are broken and completely unmanufacturable, but here is Nvidia (or TSMC), actually manufacturing the chips. Nothing can be THAT bad.