Intel 4.5GHz & 5GHz LinX Stable Club

[zalbard]

Done about 10 days ago quickly...

CPU: Core i7 920 D0, #3849A832, 4650.5MHz (222MHz x 21, 221.5MHz actual), With Vdroop, 1.611V idle, 1.541V load, HyperThreading On, 3987MHz Uncore, 42C idle, 89C load
DRAM: Mushkin Ascent Redline 6GB 6-7-6-18-59-1T 1600MHz kit at 1772MHz, 7-8-7-18-59-1T, DRAM Ratio sub-timings, 1.67V
MOBO: EVGA X58 Classified E759 with EK FC block
GPU: MSI R5850 OC at 1.225V/1000MHz/1250MHz
COOLING: Water with a single HW Labs BI GTX360 cooling CPU, motherboard, and GPU(s), 23C ambient

Fantastic!
Should I update your existing entry in the OP, or would you like me to add one more?

[Movieman]

Learn to not brag on the forums before you actually did something.
I never tried to have 4,5HT ON, and like I said before: 4,6 HT ON ON AIR is almost impossible. And you were the one claiming you've got that cpu capable of doing it. You failed m8, since I can't see 4600mhz ht on in the pictures.

Actually you don't want me to upload screenshots of an i7 doing 4,8GHz HT ON linx stable that my friend was running on SS. So better don't say "maybe 1 day you will". Instead of that upload your 4,6ghz ht on mr. fail.

before you have another brainfart
i never stated i used ht
that was first time i even completed passes linx on ht
so dont start puttin words in my mouth and drop the crackpipe

and if i wanted to do 4.6 with ht i can all i need is proper coolin cause i know the cpu can do it

maybe i should ask god to gimme his linx pass @ 6.0

Ok gentlemen..Lets take a deep breath and remember to treat all as friends ok?
Thanks for listening

[OC Nub]

zsams: Nice LinX runs, very hard to do with air cooling.

[dejanh]

Fantastic!
Should I update your existing entry in the OP, or would you like me to add one more?

Update existing I guess

Edit: Nice, #2 with HT On hahahaha, behind the phase guy

[newhit]

I still cannot figure out what LinX does or what is the absolute correct test but I hope this is close enough........... Be gentle.

[zalbard]

I still cannot figure out what LinX does or what is the absolute correct test but I hope this is close enough........... Be gentle

You got it all right, mate.
Welcome to the club!
Really nice low vCore btw.

[ChaosAD]

newhit very nice cpu there. And nice temps also. But isnt 50gflops a little low for 4,6Ghz? I get 57+ at 4,4.

[tool_462]

newhit very nice cpu there. And nice temps also. But isnt 50gflops a little low for 4,6Ghz? I get 57+ at 4,4.

Very low, that is what I was thinking.

Started it up, been Folding ExtraLarge WU's for a few days so shouldn't have any issues passing LinX. I'll post when it finishes (if I remember to do it today )

[newhit]

newhit very nice cpu there. And nice temps also. But isnt 50gflops a little low for 4,6Ghz? I get 57+ at 4,4.

Apologies, but I wouldn't know what a high value is or what the problem is or if there is one. I just pressed the required buttons and waited. If there is another test required just let me know.


These are my settings. Maybe the answer is there (low bclk?, QPI?)

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=790

[PiLsY]

GFlops is very sensitive to memory timings. That looks about right for 8-9-8 or slower @ 1600mhz (or maybe 11/12 @ 2000mhz). I'm guessing you have some auto memory timings . Check the memory tab on cpuz (or download cpu tweaker for more detailed readings) to see what your timings are at. Linx is much like SuperPi in terms of tweaking memory - higher memory performance can overcome cpu speed in terms of GFlops.

Can we post i3's here? I only ask as its a bit easy to get 4.5ghz on them - wonder if we need a 5ghz club for 32nm? Seen a fair few 6xx series at 5ghz even on air. A good 5xx series seems to top out at about 4.7-4.8ghz. Mine struggles past 4.5 and needs loads of voltage - guess that makes it about average?

[zalbard]

Can we post i3's here? I only ask as its a bit easy to get 4.5ghz on them - wonder if we need a 5ghz club for 32nm? Seen a fair few 6xx series at 5ghz even on air. A good 5xx series seems to top out at about 4.7-4.8ghz. Mine struggles past 4.5 and needs loads of voltage - guess that makes it about average?

Anything that's made by Intel, mate.

[CryptiK]

Any chance we can get the i7 list divided into 'HT on' and 'HT off' groups, since there is a significant difference in the difficulty of one vs the other?

Here's my submission.

Ci7 920 | HT On | 1.320v | 1.290 Vtt | Watercooled

Running 20th loop:




Finished:

[MrDucky]

Verry nice CPU :O i wan't one of those :P

[zalbard]

Any chance we can get the i7 list divided into 'HT on' and 'HT off' groups, since there is a significant difference in the difficulty of one vs the other?

I don't think there is much point, is there? Would be splitting the list in waaay too many small parts... I'd have to do the same for Gulftown, i3, etc...
I could also add whether HT is on or off to each submission (in bold) as an option.
What do you guys think? Shall I bother doing either?

[radaja]

CryptiK,thats an awesome OC using such low vcore.
man i wish i had a chip like that to play with

[CryptiK]

Verry nice CPU :O i wan't one of those :P

Thanks.

I don't think there is much point, is there? Would be splitting the list in waaay too many small parts... I'd have to do the same for Gulftown, i3, etc...
I could also add whether HT is on or off to each submission (in bold) as an option.
What do you guys think? Shall I bother doing either?

I didn't mean physically divide the list, just noting whether HT was on or off would be fine. I just think it's relevant since it's harder to have HT on. Thanks for your efforts with this club so far

CryptiK,thats an awesome OC using such low vcore.
man i wish i had a chip like that to play with

Thanks mate, it's still going strong.

[radaja]

your getting some impressive clocks with it.what board are you using?

[zalbard]

I didn't mean physically divide the list, just noting whether HT was on or off would be fine. I just think it's relevant since it's harder to have HT on. Thanks for your efforts with this club so far

Ah, that's easy, I'll do that in a moment.
Edit: done, enjoy! Hope you like it!

Thanks for your efforts with this club so far

You're welcome!

your getting some impressive clocks with it.what board are you using?

R2E I believe.

[CryptiK]

your getting some impressive clocks with it.what board are you using?

Yeah Zalbard is right, Rampage II Extreme.

Ah, that's easy, I'll do that in a moment.
Edit: done, enjoy! Hope you like it!

Thanks, it's easier to get a full overview of data now without looking at each submission.

[andressergio]

Any chance we can get the i7 list divided into 'HT on' and 'HT off' groups, since there is a significant difference in the difficulty of one vs the other?

Here's my submission.

Ci7 920 | HT On | 1.320v | 1.290 Vtt | Watercooled

Running 20th loop:




Finished:

guess the water cooling bird was right
awesome results my friend happy for ya enjoy !!!

cheers
sergio

[RoEy]

Sorry to post here in this prestigious thread without screen shots but I’m just curious if people in here have LLC enabled or disabled?

I’m currently at 4ghz, 920 d0, R2E,6gb 3x2 Corsair Dominator 1600.

Bios:
Vcore – 1.275 (1.31 load)
VTT – 1.275
LLC - enabled

Got custom water cooling with a Heatkiller copper (nickel-plated), tfc quad rad and 4870x2 in loop.

Temps at 4ghz under Linx, 67 66 66 62

I just want to know whether it’s better with LLC on or off

How far can I safely push the volts for 24/7? I always thought it was 1.35 for vcore but some of you go way passed that, lol!

I’d love to join this club!

Thanks,

RoEy

[ChaosAD]

Certainly not the right thread to ask something like this. Better try at R2E thread. But your temps seems a little high for 4Ghz with 1.3v.

[zalbard]

Certainly not the right thread to ask something like this. Better try at R2E thread. But your temps seems a little high for 4Ghz with 1.3v.

Hm, in fact, I don't mind, actually.

@ RoEy:
Pretty sure most people run with LLC enabled, but you have to test this by yourself.
Regarding the voltage... Don't be shy, up to 1.5V vCore and VTT should be fine. Just don't fry your chip with high temps.

[ban916]

So no one can get the i5 750 stable huh??

[zalbard]

So no one can get the i5 750 stable huh??

Guess people just don't use really good cooling or really good motherboards with their i5's...