Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 44 of 44

Thread: OCZ shows its full Sandforce based SSD lineup

  1. #26
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Athens -> Hellas
    Posts
    944
    Quote Originally Posted by turtletrax View Post
    RAID 0 with SSDs is a romantic thought, but disables trim. Drive slows down then you have to wipe them separately then re-image. OK for a bench rig, sux for a 24/7. I am gonna go with two 100+GB drives and leave them separate. Blazing fast encoding and trim FTW!!

    GC works fine so far in current OCZ drives....only xtra-heavy usage may set your array's performance back...but you can always use Tony-Trim once in a week and be fine....

  2. #27
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    AB. Canada
    Posts
    827
    Quote Originally Posted by turtletrax View Post
    RAID 0 with SSDs is a romantic thought, but disables trim. Drive slows down then you have to wipe them separately then re-image. OK for a bench rig, sux for a 24/7. I am gonna go with two 100+GB drives and leave them separate. Blazing fast encoding and trim FTW!!
    I can understand that, however how often does one need to run trim?
    If i get my boot drive all configured and never write to it, i.e user profile directory on a different drive, temp directory in ram drive, swap file disabled.
    How often would the boot drive change, how often would one need to run trim?


    "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" - (Einstein)

  3. #28
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by MadHacker View Post
    How often would the boot drive change, how often would one need to run trim?
    Intel recommends doing it daily.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  4. #29
    Xtreme Monster
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,182
    Just to clarify,

    Corsair SSD Force series will be released in 2 weeks, 100GB and 200GB

    http://www.corsair.com/products/ssd_force/default.aspx

    285 MB/s sequential read
    275 MB/s sequential write

    Price for the 100GB model £333.

    http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/100GB...-Write-275MB-s

    Price for the 200GB model £578.

    http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/200GB...-Write-275MB-s

    http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=22775

    The OCZ Vertex 2 will indeed use SF-1200 and will come next month, 50GB, 100GB and 200GB.

    Nice

  5. #30
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Hope the price in US will be much lower than that...
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  6. #31
    Xtreme Monster
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,182
    We pay 18% tax here also I think Corsair is charging more than is due.

    OCZ Vertex Limited Edition is selling for £310 in the UK. http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showpr...odid=HD-035-OC

    OCZ gives 3 years of warranty for SSD's. On the other side, Corsair will give only 2 years of warranty,.

    Let's see how the Corsair Force 100GB will compare to the Vertex 2 Price / Performance.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    942
    indeed, specially since as others posted here.. 50GB is pretty much worthless. After just installing Win 7 x64 on my SSD (Which was the bare minimum size I was willing to work with) about 20gigs were gone!!!!

    However I still have a constant +200mb/s to this day so trim is working. We need higher capacities though, the $/GB is still astronomical and has hardly gone down a cent in a year. Sandforce does have my faith, if they can make MLC the end all people are happy with perhaps then prices will settle, as it feels to me the sky high price of SLC is skewing the market perception of what is acceptible.

  8. #33
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    CroLand
    Posts
    379
    Or just wait for Agility2 for better per/£
    Last edited by n!Cola; 03-06-2010 at 05:11 PM.
    Phenom II x6 1055T | ASRock 880G Ex.3 | 560Ti FrozrII 1GB| Corsair Vengeance 1600 2x4GB | Win7 64 | M4 128GB

    VR Box - i5 6600 | MSI Mortar | Gigabyte G1 GTX 1060 | Viper 16GB DDR4 2400 | 256 SSD | Oculus Rift CV1 + Touch

  9. #34
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Grande Prairie, AB, CAN
    Posts
    6,140
    Quote Originally Posted by Dainas View Post
    indeed, specially since as others posted here.. 50GB is pretty much worthless. After just installing Win 7 x64 on my SSD (Which was the bare minimum size I was willing to work with) about 20gigs were gone!!!!

    However I still have a constant +200mb/s to this day so trim is working. We need higher capacities though, the $/GB is still astronomical and has hardly gone down a cent in a year. Sandforce does have my faith, if they can make MLC the end all people are happy with perhaps then prices will settle, as it feels to me the sky high price of SLC is skewing the market perception of what is acceptible.
    Disable hibernation and move pagefile off the drive. Windows 7 takes like 8GB.

  10. #35
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    CroLand
    Posts
    379
    Quote Originally Posted by lowfat View Post
    Disable hibernation and move pagefile off the drive. Windows 7 takes like 8GB.
    At start, yes
    Phenom II x6 1055T | ASRock 880G Ex.3 | 560Ti FrozrII 1GB| Corsair Vengeance 1600 2x4GB | Win7 64 | M4 128GB

    VR Box - i5 6600 | MSI Mortar | Gigabyte G1 GTX 1060 | Viper 16GB DDR4 2400 | 256 SSD | Oculus Rift CV1 + Touch

  11. #36
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Don't these drives compress the data on it (to reduce writes), so the same data should take up less space compared to other drives?

  12. #37
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by turtletrax View Post
    RAID 0 with SSDs is a romantic thought, but disables trim. Drive slows down then you have to wipe them separately then re-image. OK for a bench rig, sux for a 24/7. I am gonna go with two 100+GB drives and leave them separate. Blazing fast encoding and trim FTW!!
    My OCZ raid 0 Atto scores are higher now after 6 month then in the day i installed windows 7, so GC is working.

  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,820
    The compression cannot estimate how much space will be used by the data, once it is compressed, hence the size shown to the user never changes.
    However, the controller can use it to do less writes than it would usually need to. Essentially it does reduce space taken by actual data, but only for internal purposes.


    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    Don't these drives compress the data on it (to reduce writes), so the same data should take up less space compared to other drives?
    P5E64_Evo/QX9650, 4x X25-E SSD - gimme speed..
    Quote Originally Posted by MR_SmartAss View Post
    Lately there has been a lot of BS(Dave_Graham where are you?)

  14. #39
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    Don't these drives compress the data on it (to reduce writes), so the same data should take up less space compared to other drives?
    That's the first time I hear about it. Really really doubt that.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  15. #40
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    203
    basically, it uses compression to reduce its write amplification. it is NOT used to give you more storage space.

    it sounds simple enough to do; its how effective it is that is in doubt.

  16. #41
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    942
    Quote Originally Posted by lowfat View Post
    Disable hibernation and move pagefile off the drive. Windows 7 takes like 8GB.
    I did both of those, and still 17gb. Doesnt matter though, drives under 80gb are a waste of money.

  17. #42
    Xtreme Monster
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,182
    I have a feeling OCZ will not put these Sandforce drives to sale until the Vertex LE stock is depleted. How sad!

  18. #43
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    the write compression is true, a new version of write amplification control, i dunno but hardware level compression sounds flaky at best to me. Also what about files that are already highly compressed? they will still write the same. also the compression aids in the speed of writes, so when you are dealing with already compressed files your writes are gonna go to crap. i just dont buy it. its a nice new idea but i would want to see a couple of hundred hours put on one of these drives and the performance tested then before i would drop a penny on it.
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  19. #44
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    261
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    That's the first time I hear about it. Really really doubt that.
    Only the SandForce controller does that (search for the AnandTech article on it if you want more info).

    However, the SandForce controller's compression goal is to enhance write performance and reduce wear, it's not really meant to increase the drive's capacity if I understand it correctly.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •