Surprisingly clear PCB photos of the
GTX470
GTX480
HD5870 for comparison
comments on razno's Fermi PCB photos:
470:
- 9+2 blue, 3 red capacitors, by constrast 5870 PCB only has 5 med caps.
- 4 phases for GPU (big ass inductor + 3 FETs each)
- Huge DRAM chip looking inductor + 2 caps and 3 FETs for GDDR5 Vddq
- no visible IC for Vreg on right side of board, 1 med and 3 small DIP IC on left.
- silk screen for 3 extra caps on right, and 2 small IC on left
480:
- 6 phase power? 5870 only had 4!? (same 3 FET for each phase setup)
- 4870's 2 big caps and huge inductor for GDDR5, replaced by tiny caps and inductors??
- 6 blue, and 8 big red caps
- 6 extra (tiny) chips for each phase (with silly putty still on)
- to the right of vent holes PCB looks barren
- 1 med and 2 small IC on left. Guessing big Vreg chip under white square.
- silk screen for 4 small and 1 large IC on left.
- silk screen for extra 3rd 6ping power connector !!
- smaller vent holes than 470! and 470 had 3 mounting holes around them!(fans screws to pcb)??
Interesting observations compared to AMD:
5870 uses 4 phases, 5850 uses 3 phases. Both nVidia and AMD abandoned 1 PCB for all GPU long ago.
Despite 2x SP, 5850 has ~power as 4850/4890 - 100-120W. Very unlikely for GTX470.
GTX470 has so many capacitors on right, no room for full heat sink.
Obvious absence of nVidia display chip.. and DVI+DVI+HDMI -> no eyeFinity equivalent?
Last edited by ***Deimos***; 03-04-2010 at 11:29 AM.
24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V
i7 950@4.05Ghz HeatKiller 3.0
EVGA E762 EK WB | 12Gb OCZ3X1600LV6GK
Razer Tarantula |Razer Imperator | SB X-Fi PCIe
480GTX Tri SLi EK WBs | HAF X | Corsair AX1200
____________________________________________
Loop1: Double_MCP655(EK Dual Top) - MoRa3Pro_4x180 - HK3.0 - EKFB_E762
Loop2: Koolance_MCP655(EK Top) - HWLabsSR1_360 - EK_FC480GTX(3x)
Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810
Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830
AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
Corsair VX450
Thanks for the video!
Since I'm nice :P I took the following screenshots for your digestion:
It looks like:
- Charlie's and other's rumor that GTX480 kicks HD5870's arse in Unigine Heaven benchmark is true.
- 3D surround is likely a software response to ATI's eyefinity. They plugged the 3rd monitor into the second GTX 480.
It's nice to finally see something REAL from NVIDIA!
All this proves one theory of mine, Nvidia believe in using tessellation as a distinctive feature in DX11 from their rivals. Without heavy tessellation "tessellation in Heaven is very heavy" there is a chance that 5870 2GB comes close to GTX 480's performance.
I think Nvidia will make a huge deal about tessellation and most TWIMTBP games will include heavy tessellation effects that ATi cards just cant work with.
Coming Soon
Yeah, I strongly believe this too. Nvidia made Fermi to handle tessellation better against ATI.
Just read this off of gametrailers forums. "It's something like this, ATI cards have a dedicated unit called a tessellator that can only perform tessellation related functions and since it's a dedicated unit it has fixed performance. Nvidia has a flexible solution that can allocate performance to where is needed, if tessellation is demanding it will allocate resources toward it accordingly, if not more resources will be dedicated to increase performance for shaders etc."
So basically why it's faster is cause it can allocate and is dynamic. Now, what I would like to see is tessellation being disabled, and then see the performance. It's probably a safe bet to say the performance will be very close, but I don't know. I'm speculating that the 480 is going to be faster than the 5870 anyways in regular games, the question is how much. Could be 20%, could be on par, these are all with common games. Don't know about the 470, could be slower, or it could catch up in some games. Though, what worries me is with tessellation enabled seeing the 5870 struggle. They're going to have to come up some kind of solution in the future when more games come out this year that use tessellation. The only thing they have right now is the dual GPU cards that could beat it, but at the same time they are dual GPU and there's the micro-stuttering issue, and the fact that 60fps single gpu doesn't equal 60fps on a dual GPU.
Don't know about the roadmap though, the only thing I can think of is Northern Islands, but that's still a ways away. ATI could really be stuck in a rut here with tessellation until new hardware comes out.
Antec 900
Corsair TX750
Gigabyte EP45 UD3P
Q9550 E0 500x8 4.0 GHZ 1.360v
ECO A.L.C Cooler with Gentle Typhoon PushPull
Kingston HyperX T1 5-5-5-18 1:1
XFX Radeon 6950 @ 880/1300 (Shader unlocked)
WD Caviar Black 2 x 640GB - Short Stroked 120GB RAID0 128KB Stripe - 540GB RAID1
When tessellation will only have a ON and OFF option and the ON option will enable heavy tessellation that only Nvidia h/w can handle and ATi's 5870 may have a difficult time handling heavy tessellation.
What Nvidia will have is a legit excuse of why the games perform better on Nvidia hardware than ATi one. Just like Nvidia Physx was the keyword for 2009, tessellation may as well be a keyword for Nvidia for 2010 !!
Coming Soon
Lol, guys, look at this screenshot. Nvidia is magically using version 1.1 of heaven. This could bring an improvement to the FPS numbers of heaven. We don't know whether they used 1.1 or 1.0 for their HD5870 benchmarks... Also, the HD5870 seems to catch up with higher IQ settings. I would love to see a benchmark with atleast 8x AF and 8x AA.
Last edited by Musho; 03-04-2010 at 12:56 PM.
I'd like to see the benchmark with AA and AF maxed out too.
Antec 900
Corsair TX750
Gigabyte EP45 UD3P
Q9550 E0 500x8 4.0 GHZ 1.360v
ECO A.L.C Cooler with Gentle Typhoon PushPull
Kingston HyperX T1 5-5-5-18 1:1
XFX Radeon 6950 @ 880/1300 (Shader unlocked)
WD Caviar Black 2 x 640GB - Short Stroked 120GB RAID0 128KB Stripe - 540GB RAID1
Well I just saw on nvidia driver site they already have 300 series on the list for driver downloads. So it must be getting close.......errrr
~ Little Slice of Heaven ~
Lian Li PC-A05NB w/ Gentle Typhoons
Core i7 860 @ 3gHz w/ Thor's Hammer
eVGA P55 SLI
8GB RAM
Gigabyte 7970
Corsair HX850
OZC Vertex3 SSD 240GB
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Except this is not the 300 series
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Intel Core i7-3770K
ASUS P8Z77-I DELUXE
EVGA GTX 970 SC
Corsair 16GB (2x8GB) Vengeance LP 1600
Corsair H80
120GB Samsung 840 EVO, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
Corsair RM650
Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced
OC: 5Ghz | +0.185 offset : 1.352v
avp maybe, haven't played it. dirt 2 and stalker? if 1 pixel changes because of tessellation I don't call it tessellation
what I call tessellation is the awesome rocky ground in Unigine Benchmark. I don't care if the left pocket button of an enemy is rendered in tessellation or not
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Bookmarks