Results 1 to 25 of 2723

Thread: The GT300/Fermi Thread - Part 2!

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by nnunn View Post
    The real problem we-the-army-of-cuda-elves face is cooling 4 dual GPU cards dangling off those slow old PCIe slots.

    What we REALLY want Nvidia to do is to get GloFo to write quad-Fermis that drop into spare mobo sockets.

    But looks like AMD may do this first... what's an apprentice elf to do
    quad fermi? that wouldnt physically fit on a package of any cpu socket, even G34
    besides it being impossible to pay for, impossible to cool, and starving from memory bandwidth... what would be the point of this? more system bandwidth... but it wouldnt be able to use it since it would be completely starved memory bandwidth wise...

    what we need is hyper transport instead of pciE... if qpi would be open then that would work too...

    but just out of curiousity... why do you think those gpus are system bandwidth limited exactly?
    silverstone had a quad 9800gx2 gpgpu demo at computex and they said it scaled linearly with every card they added... which means pciE bandwidth wasnt an issue at all as adding more cards results in some slots switching from 16x to 8x...
    Last edited by saaya; 02-20-2010 at 08:01 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •