I have used Maxtor and WD, and tried the new Samsung drives, no difference in overclock with any of them, since the PCI & AGP buss is locked, the hard drive should not be holding you back. Are you stuck at 200 FSB?
I have used Maxtor and WD, and tried the new Samsung drives, no difference in overclock with any of them, since the PCI & AGP buss is locked, the hard drive should not be holding you back. Are you stuck at 200 FSB?
Quite chuffed with this little setup....helps with the game loads
4x software raid0 - 3x sata + 1x ide
80gb seagate barracuda 7200.7 ide
160gb maxtor 6Y160M0 sata
200gb seagate barracuda 7200.7 SATA 200822ST3200822AS sata
250gb maxtor STM3250310AS sata
Last edited by THOMO; 01-10-2010 at 05:56 PM.
*******************UPDATE************************* *
same drives / same stripe 64kb stripe on LSI 9260-4i sas/sata raid card.
win7 64 enterprise 7600
biostar TA790GX A3+ / sb750
am3 x4 965c3
4x2gb D9 ddr3
5850
2x64gb ocz summit 19c FW raid0 64kb on LSI 9260-4i
i'm dumping the summits for 149 ea on ebay, plus all my am3 cpus and the board and going back to intel 775 for a brief period until the new cpus and boards come out in a month or so.
-consider this my last bench with this setup.
Last edited by trans am; 01-11-2010 at 06:40 PM.
2x Acard 9010 32GB + Areca ARC-1261ML
left with cache - right without cache
![]()
![]()
P6T DELUXE V2 / I7 920 D0 @ 4.2GHZ Corsair H50 / TRIDENT 2GHZ CL8 / INTEL X25-M / ASUS EAH5850 / HX620W
Areca 1231ML 2GB cache 2x Intel 160GB SSD
Areca 1680-16 2GB cache 10x WD BLACK 1TB Raid 6
Perc 5i 256MB cache 3x Raptor 150GB (1x VelociRaptor) raid 0
3 Hardware raid on 3 pcs
MAIN PC: CPU: Intel Core 7 920 D0 , MB Evga SLI MCRO X58, RAM: Corsair Dominator DDR3 1600MHz 6GB, GFX: 6970 2GB , OS HDD: Intel 40GB , Intel 160GB G2 SSD, WD SCORPIO BLUE 500GB, Case LIAN LI PC-V354 , Windows 7 Ultimate
FILE/MEDIA Server: MB: Supermicro X8SIA-F , CPU: Intel Xeon Quad-Core - X3460, Raid card: Areca 1880i+ HP SAS Expander ,CASE: Chenbro RM 414B , OS DISK WD Scorpio Black 160gb ,RAM: 4GB DDR3 1333MHz ECC/Reg ,PSU: Corsair HX750W , HHD: 10x HITACHI Deskstar 2TB, OS: Windows server 2008
Server2: MB: Tyan S5217G2NR-EFI Bigby-P, CPU: Intel Dual core , 4GB RAM , Areca 1680IX-16, HDD 10x WD Black 1TB
RAID 6 results (HD Tune), same config (8 X Hitachi 7K2000 & Adaptec RAID 5805 & P6T6 Revo):
7.9ms seek time, and only 2199GB, is that a partition/slice i guess. Nice systems.Areca 1680-16 2GB cache 10x WD BLACK 1TB Raid 6
P6T DELUXE V2 / I7 920 D0 @ 4.2GHZ Corsair H50 / TRIDENT 2GHZ CL8 / INTEL X25-M / ASUS EAH5850 / HX620W
Insane. And i'm thinking what to do with my netbook and it's 50MB/s transfers lol...
Intel Core i7 920 4 GHz | 18 GB DDR3 1600 MHz | ASUS Rampage II Gene | GIGABYTE HD7950 3GB WindForce 3X | WD Caviar Black 2TB | Creative Sound Blaster Z | Altec Lansing MX5021 | Corsair HX750 | Lian Li PC-V354
Super silent cooling powered by (((Noiseblocker)))
Some SSD benching, A SSD Benchmark on Intel X25-M G1 FW 8822 RAID0, same Adaptec Controller:
G1 RAID0 brings the same result than a single Postville.
P6T DELUXE V2 / I7 920 D0 @ 4.2GHZ Corsair H50 / TRIDENT 2GHZ CL8 / INTEL X25-M / ASUS EAH5850 / HX620W
I've bought X25-M 80GB G2 for my Aspire One, but results were not really worth it imo. Sure boot was faster and it used less power (i got extra 1,5 hour on battery!), but programs still loaded slowly (not all but mostly) and benchmarked speed was way below what i expected. Read was hardly over 100MB/s and that's something better HDD's for aptops can pull off for half the price and 6 times larger capacity.
I've decided to buy extra RAM instead and use SuperSpeed SuperCache on it. 512MB cache to boost existing HDD should do the trick for almost no extra cost. Plus, extra RAM always helps.
Last edited by RejZoR; 01-14-2010 at 09:42 PM.
Intel Core i7 920 4 GHz | 18 GB DDR3 1600 MHz | ASUS Rampage II Gene | GIGABYTE HD7950 3GB WindForce 3X | WD Caviar Black 2TB | Creative Sound Blaster Z | Altec Lansing MX5021 | Corsair HX750 | Lian Li PC-V354
Super silent cooling powered by (((Noiseblocker)))
9211-i8 with 7 intels
first 2 pics are 4k seq 1 queue depth for latency and 4k seq 32queue for max perfomance
senond 2 pics are 64k file seq. 32 queue depth for maximum performance.
@ Agrophel
And without cache? (AS SSD)![]()
That read below 100MB/sec shows something is wrong, I'm over 200MB/sec single drive and just shy of 600MB/sec with 3 drive RAID0 in sequential reads in crystaldiskmark.
Does the aspire have SATAI ports instead of II?
maybe try updating the chipset drives?
does it do ahci?
@ Nizzen
And HDtune?
After about 4 months of usage, still running strong:
![]()
4 OCZ Vertex ssd's on a LSI MegaRAID SAS 9260-4i. Very sweet setup.
GFDuke
insane speed![]()
Intel Q9650 @500x9MHz/1,3V
Asus Maximus II Formula @Performance Level=7
OCZ OCZ2B1200LV4GK 4x2GB @1200MHz/5-5-5-15/1,8V
OCZ SSD Vertex 3 120Gb
Seagate RAID0 2x ST1000DM003
XFX HD7970 3GB @1111MHz
Thermaltake Xaser VI BWS
Seasonic Platinum SS-1000XP
M-Audio Audiophile 192
LG W2486L
Liquid Cooling System :
ThermoChill PA120.3 + Coolgate 4x120
Swiftech Apogee XT, Swiftech MCW-NBMAX Northbridge
Watercool HeatKiller GPU-X3 79X0 Ni-Bl + HeatKiller GPU Backplate 79X0
Laing 12V DDC-1Plus with XSPC Laing DDC Reservoir Top
3x Scythe S-FLEX "F", 4x Scythe Gentle Typhoon "15", Scythe Kaze Master Ace 5,25''
Apple MacBook Pro 17` Early 2011:
CPU: Sandy Bridge Intel Core i7 2720QM
RAM: Crucial 2x4GB DDR3 1333
SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256 GB SSD
HDD: ADATA Nobility NH13 1GB White
OS: Mac OS X Mavericks
wow...sweet setup indead....win7 install time 2min?lol
whats mobos are u ppl using FOR THESE RAID CARDS???????????? 4x or 8x pci ex 2.0 slots are needed?
biostar engys and lsi engys told me NOT to use the 16x extra video card(XFIRE) slot on my biostar i45 mobo as it is 16x and also backwards compatble to 8x 2.0 but might wig out AND NOT officially supported or tested???
Last edited by railmeat; 02-15-2010 at 04:24 PM.
Stacker830 Watercooled
windows7 ultimate 64 bit!!!
heatkiller(rev3) on 2500k@ 4.5ghz 1.35v,8 gigs 2133 ripjaws 1.5v
Swiftech Mcp-655,1/2in tygon,13x120 sunnons on junk ps,
(2)triple 120mm rads,Biostar TP67XE(rev 5.2)
150 gig velicraptor (stable drive) ssds r still buggy!!
xfi-xtrememusic,klipsch ultras, sen hd-595s
Evga Hydro gtX 590,co0lermaster-1250 watt,
24" Sony fw-900 black ops at @ 2304x1440 85hz/85fps SOLID
G@m3r 4 L1Fe!!
http://s76.photobucket.com/albums/j1...0VIEW%20ALL--/
3dmark 11 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1102387
I'll answer your PM here. This is my configuration with the P6TD Revolution:
As you can see in the picture, the GPU in the first slot (2nd disabled due to his heatsink), Adaptec 5850 controller works in the third, finally 2 X Intel Quad PT Server (PCI-e 4X) on the 4 & 5 slots.
(bad picture quality sorry).
P6T DELUXE V2 / I7 920 D0 @ 4.2GHZ Corsair H50 / TRIDENT 2GHZ CL8 / INTEL X25-M / ASUS EAH5850 / HX620W
More drives and faster controller.
8 x Fujitsu MBA3147RC 147GB 15K SAS
HighPoint RocketRAID 4320 IOP348
RAID-5, 64KB Stripe, Write-Back, Disk Cache Enabled
![]()
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
What stripesize is that? The default 128kb? Also, do you have writeback-cache enabled? I envy your 4k @ QD1 writes. How did you get 100MB/s+? As far as I know, at queue depth 1, those shouldn't scale with raid0 (unless you're ofcourse running a stripesize of 2kb, which would kill your sequentials, if that's even possible with the ICH10R. Probably not. Anyway, very nice results!Running a single x25-m 80gb at the moment, but I'll order 2 more soon. I'll post some benches then. Hopefully my 4kb writes will scale as nicely as well. Kind of weird your 4kb writes take a hit when going to the higher queue depths, though
How much do you write to the array on daily basis on average btw? Your speeds are still new-like. Is the garbage collect feature that good in Intel's SSD?
This makes me really want to go SSD... I think I need to start looking for some deals.![]()
Asus Rampage III Formula
I7 970 (200x23=4610)
EK Supreme HF Copper
Swiftech 420 QP w/ (4) Scythe GT AP-15 (1850 RPM)
Swiftech 355 w/ ek X-Top v2
(3) Asus 5850 (1050/1250/1.3v)
(3) EK 5850 FC
Swiftech 220 QP w/ (2) Scythe GT AP-15 (1850 RPM)
Swiftech 355 w/ ek X-Top v2
Cosair HX850
(3) 2GB Gskill F3-12800CL7T-6GBPI
(1) Intel X25-M G2
(3) WD Black 1TB
Bookmarks