Quote Originally Posted by kl0012 View Post
At leaset Clarkdale IGP can do it better then AMD's IGP :


Difficult but not inpossible. Intel's IGP already reached the level of competitor's IGPs now it is just mather of time when Intel enters high perf. graphics. There's one thing remains - put more shader processors and rasterization units on die



While personaly I dont believe in such move from intel, I still can see some reasons behind this, mostly price driven. Also it seems, that Intel may incorporate some gpgpu functionality in newer IGPs.
did you actually check the full review of xbitlabs: EPIC failure

they use 785 chipset without sideport so its a 1year old chipset against the latest, there are way faster chipsets available and within 1 month you have the 8xx series. They use a 3.0 intel against 2.9 amd hohoho a dual against a quad, so again the power and price is out of spec none of the tests done is actually using the quad core.

If you only show the games where it was actually higher sure an intel fan is always right, but what about quake,trackmania,streetfighter,hawx,far cry,left4 dead where the new intel is equal or way less for sure with 1280 res.