No.Originally Posted by Grnfinger
You shouldn't make sweeping statements like that.
What your idea of stable is doesn't make it law...others will have different opinions myself included.
12 hours of prime is ridiculous, its like the guy that was telling everyone to run IBT 50 to 100 loops
Kill your hardware that's up to you, but don't advise others to do so.
There are "laws" to overclocking. If you do not follow them, you do not O/C properly. This is a fact, as are these.
24 hrs Minimum Prime 95 Small FFT, Then Blend. If you pass this you are more or less completely stable.
1 Week Prime 95 is required for an actual stability test. I could crash 95% of the overclocks you 8 hr Primers think is stable. I have had Prime 95 tests fail after 56hrs. Yeah that's right.
Point being, it wasn't just a stoke of luck that PC's were built. People built them with specific guidelines, as long as you follow them you will be fine. Adequate cooling. All that is necessary.
Saying that more than 8hrs of Prime "kills" your hardware is a level of n00batry that I am not even equipped to deal with. The very fact that I and I know many others have failed Prime 95 MANY hours past 8, would say your statement needs some serious re-thought.
I just finished failing a 18 hr run with my voltages lowered. LOL by your logic it's stable 2x over with 2 hrs to spare. But it's not. Don't be a typical retard and disregard what I am saying. Start entering facts into your sentences, instead of just thinking you know the answer.
Even cleaned up your spelling errors in your quote for you.
Hows this for temps? TR Ultra-120a Push/Pull. Funny thing is, I would guarantee my 120a against even a Venomous-x. Hands down no competition. Check those load temps. If anyone would like to see the inside of my case I will gladly oblige.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks