Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 94

Thread: Graphene Transistors @ 100 gigahertz

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    591

    Graphene Transistors @ 100 gigahertz

    Graphene Transistors that Work at Blistering Speeds

    IBM has created graphene transistors that leave silicon ones in the dust. The prototype devices, made from atom-thick sheets of carbon, operate at 100 gigahertz--meaning they can switch on and off 100 billion times each second, about 10 times as fast as the speediest silicon transistors.
    Speedy switches: These arrays of transistors, printed on a silicon carbide wafer, operate at speeds of 100 gigahertz.
    Credit: Science/AAAS

    The transistors were created using processes that are compatible with existing semiconductor manufacturing, and experts say they could be scaled up to produce transistors for high-performance imaging, radar, and communications devices within the next few years, and for zippy computer processors in a decade or so.

    Researchers have previously made graphene transistors using laborious mechanical methods, for example by flaking off sheets of graphene from graphite; the fastest transistors made this way have reached speeds of up to 26 gigahertz. Transistors made using similar methods have not equaled these speeds.

    Growing transistors on a wafer not only leads to better performance, it's also more commercially feasible, says Phaedon Avouris, leader of the nanoscale science and technology group at the IBM Watson Research Center in Ossining, NY where the work was carried out.

    Ultimately, graphene has the potential to replace silicon in high-speed computer processors. As computers get faster each year, silicon is getting closer and closer to its physical limits, and graphene provides a promising potential replacement because electrons move through the material much faster than they do through silicon. "Even without optimizing the design, these transistors are already 2.5 times better than silicon," says Yu-Ming Lin, another researcher at IBM Watson who collaborated with Avouris.

    Other researchers have made very fast transistors using expensive semiconductor materials such as indium phosphide, but these devices only operate at low temperatures. In theory, graphene has the material properties needed to let transistors run at terahertz speeds at room temperature.

    The IBM researchers grew the graphene on the surface of a two-inch silicon-carbide wafer. The process starts when they heat the wafer until the silicon evaporates, leaving behind a thin layer of carbon, known as epitaxial graphene. This technique has been used to make transistors before, but the IBM team improved the process by using better materials for the other parts of the transistor, in particular the insulator.

    "Graphene's properties are very sensitive to its environment," says Lin. This is why the IBM group focused on designing a new insulating layer--the part of the transistor that prevents short circuits. They found that adding a thin layer of a polymer between the dielectric and the graphene improved performance. The work is described this week in the journal Science.



    Walter de Heer, a professor of physics at Georgia Tech in Atlanta who pioneered methods used to work with epitaxial graphene, says the IBM device is a milestone because of its speed and because it was made using practical fabrication techniques. "This is not pie-in-the-sky stuff, this is real," he says. "This development is really going to turn into a communications device not too long from now."

    "One can apply the same processing technologies to get much closer to a product," says Avouris. Last year, the same IBM group, and an independent group at HRL Laboratories in Malibu, CA, both made 10 gigahertz graphene transistors using an involved method called mechanical exfoliation. This process involves peeling away layers from a small piece of graphite until a single, atom-thick sheet remains, then setting that down on a substrate and carving it to form a transistor. The problem with this approach is that it compromises graphene's electrical properties and is not commercially scalable, says Avouris.

    The first applications of graphene transistors will likely be as switches and amplifiers in analog military electronics. Indeed, the IBM group's work is supported in part by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. But the researchers say it will be years before the company begins commercial development on carbon electronics.

    De Heer notes that the IBM devices don't yet realize graphene's full potential. By carefully controlling the growing conditions, his group has made graphene that conducts electrons 10 times faster than the material used by the IBM team. This higher-quality graphene could, in theory, be used to make transistors that reach terahertz speeds, though de Heer says many things could go wrong during scale-up.

    Avouris says the IBM team will work to improve its transistors' speed by miniaturizing them. The ones it has made so far are 240 nanometers long, which is relatively large--silicon electronic components are down to about 20 nanometers. Avouris also believes that their performance could be improved by making the insulating layer thinner. "The next step is to try and integrate these transistors into a truly operational circuit," he says.
    http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/24482/

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    352
    Imagine what we could do if that technology gets released to the desktop market. I know the folding teams would love this!

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,592
    In 10 to 20 years time, an 80 core desktop processor working at 5THz thanks to 20nm or even smaller graphene structures.... Go IBM, go!! =)

    A folding paradise
    I see the big blue
    technology ever evolving.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    591
    They say it will take a decade for this to make it into the desktop. Dissappointing, but it makes sense. Right now a single transistor is 240nm..

    Can you imagine a CPU the size of your harddrive? Personally, don't really care as long as its fast

    Technology is so incredible, yet it can never come all at once. Meaning, we will never find the most optimal solution right off the bat. And it also means that if the technology was ever lost, it would take us the same amount of time to regain it.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Upstate, SC
    Posts
    644
    now the question is... how would they do under LN2
    SYSTEM
    i5-3750K @ 4.6ghz - ASRock Z77 Extreme4 - 16GB Samsung DDR3 - Sapphire R7 370 Nitro 4GB
    Water Cooling
    EK Supremecy - DDC-3.2 w/XSPC Top -Swiftech MCR320-QP - EK Multioption 150

  6. #6
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    So, realistically, 10 times faster... very very nice!
    I suppose the material is more expensive, though...
    Do they generate more heat?
    In theory, graphene has the material properties needed to let transistors run at terahertz speeds at room temperature.
    ...
    Avouris says the IBM team will work to improve its transistors' speed by miniaturizing them. The ones it has made so far are 240 nanometers long, which is relatively large--silicon electronic components are down to about 20 nanometers.
    They can go even higher!
    Hope they'll actually manage to create a chip at least...
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,247
    cpu-z validation or it didn't happen!
    1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile


    2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W

  8. #8
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    i think size is irrelevant (with the exception of cost to build it), if a cpu was the size of a CD, but still put out the same TDP, we never would have cared or wished they were the size of a dime hidden under a IHS the size of a half dollar. its actually those constraints that i think are limiting us due to how much heat is pushed out for such a small area.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    1,910
    The Future is Near, guys

    Intel Q9650 @500x9MHz/1,3V
    Asus Maximus II Formula @Performance Level=7
    OCZ OCZ2B1200LV4GK 4x2GB @1200MHz/5-5-5-15/1,8V
    OCZ SSD Vertex 3 120Gb
    Seagate RAID0 2x ST1000DM003
    XFX HD7970 3GB @1111MHz
    Thermaltake Xaser VI BWS
    Seasonic Platinum SS-1000XP
    M-Audio Audiophile 192
    LG W2486L
    Liquid Cooling System :
    ThermoChill PA120.3 + Coolgate 4x120
    Swiftech Apogee XT, Swiftech MCW-NBMAX Northbridge
    Watercool HeatKiller GPU-X3 79X0 Ni-Bl + HeatKiller GPU Backplate 79X0
    Laing 12V DDC-1Plus with XSPC Laing DDC Reservoir Top
    3x Scythe S-FLEX "F", 4x Scythe Gentle Typhoon "15", Scythe Kaze Master Ace 5,25''

    Apple MacBook Pro 17` Early 2011:
    CPU: Sandy Bridge Intel Core i7 2720QM
    RAM: Crucial 2x4GB DDR3 1333
    SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256 GB SSD
    HDD: ADATA Nobility NH13 1GB White
    OS: Mac OS X Mavericks

  10. #10
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    i think size is irrelevant (with the exception of cost to build it), if a cpu was the size of a CD, but still put out the same TDP, we never would have cared or wished they were the size of a dime hidden under a IHS the size of a half dollar. its actually those constraints that i think are limiting us due to how much heat is pushed out for such a small area.
    It matters more in terms of timing. It's not a conspiracy--as the chip gets physically larger, you have to start decreasing clock speed to maintain timing. A chip's cost is also largely tied to its die size. For these two reasons, it's bad in terms of both finance and engineering for a chip to be any larger than it has to be. You might care more when they give you your 256-core, 75MHz, $14000 CPU the size of a CD.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,445
    this is a replacement to silicon right?
    [MOBO] Asus CrossHair Formula 5 AM3+
    [GPU] ATI 6970 x2 Crossfire 2Gb
    [RAM] G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB (4 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 1600
    [CPU] AMD FX-8120 @ 4.8 ghz
    [COOLER] XSPC Rasa 750 RS360 WaterCooling
    [OS] Windows 8 x64 Enterprise
    [HDD] OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD
    [AUDIO] Logitech S-220 17 Watts 2.1

  12. #12
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,030
    Quote Originally Posted by god_43 View Post
    this is a replacement to silicon right?
    Yes.
    Are we there yet?

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    72
    too bad im going to be in the forties when this thing takes off.

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    56
    Hey maybe we can run Crysis!

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by RaZz! View Post
    cpu-z validation or it didn't happen!
    It didn't really happen. They got the transistor to 30 GHz and from the measurements they took they did some extrapolation to come up with their 100 GHz claim. This transistor is nothing like a silicon transistor though and they still have much to do. The main feat here is the fact that they actually produced a whole (2") wafer of these transistors with a pretty much existing production process.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    116
    IBM is the king of marketing hype about their process technologies. The only thing they can do is come up with press releases about how great their technology is. Meanwhile, Intel continues to actually churn out real processors based on their tech. How many years ago did IBM claim to have HK-MG technology? How many processors have IBM shipped with this tech? Until it comes to market, I think IBM is just blowing smoke. Don't believe the hype.

    Growing graphene has never been a problem. The problem is actually growing it in a manner where you can etch a chip out of it. Nothing in this article mentions anything about this.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Quote Originally Posted by WaterFlex View Post
    The Future is Near, guys
    LOL yeah I'm sure we'll even see 25core processors for everyday use next year.

  18. #18
    Crunching For The Points! NKrader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Renton WA, USA
    Posts
    2,891
    Quote Originally Posted by ulticool View Post
    Hey maybe we can run Crysis!
    I second this

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    963
    interesting innovation.... if only i'd been born in another 100 years....

  20. #20
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by purecain View Post
    interesting innovation.... if only i'd been born in another 100 years....
    They might be able to arrange that. You never know what they'll be able to do with cloning.....
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  21. #21
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    844
    This is exciting news as it presumes that graphene technology is getting closer and closer to a reality. However, I agree with some other posters that IBM is the king of marketing hype when it comes to "vaporware", have yet to see most of their stuff come to tangible fruit.

    I'll get excited when I see Intel or AMD announce that they will be releasing graphene chips!
    -Cpu:Opteron 170 LCBQE 0722RPBW(2.87ghz @ 1.300v)
    (retired)Opteron 146 (939) CAB2E 0540
    -Heatsink: Thermalright XP-90
    -Fan:120mm Yate Loon 1650 RPM @ 12V, 70.5 CFM, 33dB
    -Motherboard: DFI Lanparty nF4 UT Ultra-D
    -Ram: Mushkin High Performance blue, 2gigs(2X1gig kit) PC3200 991434
    -Hard drive: Seagate 400GB Barracuda SATA HD 7200.10(AS noisey model)
    -Video card: evga 6800GS @520/1170
    -Case: P180
    -PSU:Enermax 535Watt EG565P-VE FMA (24P)

  22. #22
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,247
    Quote Originally Posted by Helmore View Post
    It didn't really happen. They got the transistor to 30 GHz and from the measurements they took they did some extrapolation to come up with their 100 GHz claim. This transistor is nothing like a silicon transistor though and they still have much to do. The main feat here is the fact that they actually produced a whole (2") wafer of these transistors with a pretty much existing production process.
    lol, i know. it just came to my mind when reading the headline and i thought it was funny
    1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile


    2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W

  23. #23
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    970
    Megahurtz war is over, now Gigahurtz war began
    Main Rig:
    Processor & Motherboard:AMD Ryzen5 1400 ' Gigabyte B450M-DS3H
    Random Access Memory Module:Adata XPG DDR4 3000 MHz 2x8GB
    Graphic Card:XFX RX 580 4GB
    Power Supply Unit:FSP AURUM 92+ Series PT-650M
    Storage Unit:Crucial MX 500 240GB SATA III SSD
    Processor Heatsink Fan:AMD Wraith Spire RGB
    Chasis:Thermaltake Level 10GTS Black

  24. #24
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    970
    Quote Originally Posted by turbox997 View Post
    This is exciting news as it presumes that graphene technology is getting closer and closer to a reality. However, I agree with some other posters that IBM is the king of marketing hype when it comes to "vaporware", have yet to see most of their stuff come to tangible fruit.

    I'll get excited when I see Intel or AMD announce that they will be releasing graphene chips!

    I guess the soonest would be 5 years?
    Main Rig:
    Processor & Motherboard:AMD Ryzen5 1400 ' Gigabyte B450M-DS3H
    Random Access Memory Module:Adata XPG DDR4 3000 MHz 2x8GB
    Graphic Card:XFX RX 580 4GB
    Power Supply Unit:FSP AURUM 92+ Series PT-650M
    Storage Unit:Crucial MX 500 240GB SATA III SSD
    Processor Heatsink Fan:AMD Wraith Spire RGB
    Chasis:Thermaltake Level 10GTS Black

  25. #25
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    614
    You know this type of speed will make the overclockers a thing of the past...and you will have no reason to come here any more...so no, this is a bad thing.
    Modded Cosmos. | Maximus II Formula. Bios 1307| 2x2 Mushkin XP ASCENT 8500 | Q9550-E0- 4.10 + TRUE | Visiontek HD4870X2 | LN32A550 1920x1080 | X-FI Extreme Gamer | Z5300E | G15v.1 | G7 | MX518 | Corsair HX1000 | X25-MG2 80G | 5xHDD
    ____________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    most people dont care about opencl, physix, folding at home and direct compute... they want cool explosions and things blowing up and boobs jumping around realistically... .

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •