Quote Originally Posted by zerazax View Post
For someone who kept saying in the other threads that he didn't know what he was talking about, you sure love claiming "to know!"

Kind of like how you said that the GT200 was stomping the RV770 because 512-bit > 256-bit... cept for that inconvenient fact about GDDR5 which is exactly what Fermi is doing huh!



Anyways, at B3D, they analyzed the numbers and it makes sense - games which use a lot of geometry / tri-clock (such as HAWX), Fermi was quite a bit faster than the GTX 285. Those that didn't though, it was close to 5870 performance... meaning there are games where the Fermi changes will improve it's performance greatly, and others where it won't be much faster if at all more than the 5870. Hence the average performance values put it above the 5870 but not faster than the 5970.

And if you want to talk efficiency... how about comparing the card to other cards in its power envelope???
*broken record* you keep saying that^ just wth are you on about.. what claims ???

claimer: i dont know anything zip nada/am no gpu prophet

fyi: even g80 stomps on rv770

b3d ?? ohhh those ati gpu prophets ? right yeah yeah

power envelope ?? ati gpus dont eat watts vegan straight up