MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 719

Thread: AMD cuts to the core with 'Bulldozer' Opterons

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post
    If the thing they are tying does not get ready, they will use the original version of SB and in that case they will use more cores to fight BD similar to what things are with AMD and Intel right now.

    AMD is using more silicon to fight Intel per cpu...
    I've no idea what you're talking about with your 'different versions of SB'. Where did you get that information from?

    AMD using more silicon to fight Intel? I'm not so sure about that, I wouldn't be surprised if a BD module was smaller than a SB core.

    Quote Originally Posted by doompc View Post
    http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/cpu/amd/FAD2009/2/bulldozer.jpg

    Since there is only one fetch and decode units per module, are there any chance it could use all ALUs for a Single Thread ?
    They could theoretically do that, but I don't think they will as it is very very hard to get more instruction parallelism out of a single thread and you would hardly gain any performance (for single threaded loads) by using all 8 INT execution units for a single thread.
    Last edited by Helmore; 01-28-2010 at 01:18 PM.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •