MMM
Page 5 of 12 FirstFirst ... 2345678 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 284

Thread: EXCLUSIVE! New EVGA Classified Dual-Proc Board - 270-GT-W555!

  1. #101
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    202
    I hate you, I'm so jealous. Thanks for the awesome info though. (actual details! unlike those other tech sites)

  2. #102
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    398
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    Do you have any early screens with overclocking attempts? Or is it still being tested with stock settings?
    That's what everyone wants to see!


  3. #103
    Xtreme CCIE
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    3,842
    Quote Originally Posted by Article
    The board is able to run with two entirely different models of CPU, or the same CPU’s at different multipliers.
    Explanation demanded. I don't understand how this is meant to work and/or what restrictions are in place here. The two CPU's must be able to talk to one another for stability unless I'm wrong, which would require a second QPI link (meaning Xeon only), and those QPI links would have to run at the same speed to talk to one another, which implies same operating speed, right?

    Comments Enjoy/Lard? Is this a feature that thus far no other dual proc board has ever been able to implement somehow, or is that a misunderstanding/miscommunication?
    Dual CCIE (Route\Switch and Security) at your disposal. Have a Cisco-related or other network question? My PM box is always open.

    Xtreme Network:
    - Cisco 3560X-24P PoE Switch
    - Cisco ASA 5505 Firewall
    - Cisco 4402 Wireless LAN Controller
    - Cisco 3502i Access Point

  4. #104
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    2,440
    Quote Originally Posted by Serra View Post
    Explanation demanded. I don't understand how this is meant to work and/or what restrictions are in place here. The two CPU's must be able to talk to one another for stability unless I'm wrong, which would require a second QPI link (meaning Xeon only), and those QPI links would have to run at the same speed to talk to one another, which implies same operating speed, right?
    why would qpi be different?

    4.0G @ 20x200 (7.2GT/s @ 4.8 QPI ratio) + 3.6G @ 18 x 200 (7.2GT/s @ 4.8 QPI Ratio)....?

  5. #105
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Manchester, NH
    Posts
    67
    Serra: It probably means you can mix different models/speeds of Xeons and you don't have to run matched sets that server boards of old require(d).

  6. #106
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by LardArse View Post
    why would qpi be different?

    4.0G @ 20x200 (7.2GT/s @ 4.8 QPI ratio) + 3.6G @ 18 x 200 (7.2GT/s @ 4.8 QPI Ratio)....?
    That's the first overclocking info, at least 4GHz then.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  7. #107
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    2,440
    nah dont hype it up so much man, it will be too stressful for me.

  8. #108
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Sorry, my bad.
    The board just looks like a monster, so I am really excited to see how it turns out!
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  9. #109
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Near Philly, Pa
    Posts
    1,114
    Quote Originally Posted by Expat GriZ View Post
    Well, I for one can't believe the negativity shown towards this new product. Not enough of this, doesn't support that, too much power, won't fit in my case... etc. etc. blah blah blah. This is XTREME SYSTEMS and this board represents a tremendous advancement that incorporates some outstanding features, progressive ones at that which will push the limits and open doors for newer and better products down the line. It might not be for everyone, deal with it.... nothing ever is. Hats off to Shamino and the eVGA team for even attempting to bring this board to market. When it does arrive, I for one WILL be purchasing it, and I WILL save up for processors to put in it, and I will enjoy the heck out of it.

    Sorry for the rant, but come on folks.....we have something here which is new and exciting.....ENJOY IT!!!!
    I totally agree...Peter, please ignore the haters and continue to develop boards that will make the way for more fun when we overclock!! I mean, for those of us who use LN2, who cares how the sata ports are oriented? Those NF200 chips will get collateral cooling from the GPU pots! C'mon, people...do you see how petty this is? This board has but one purpose - to be rode hard and put away wet!!

    After seeing Peter smoke a custom modded Classy at the Motor City OC Event last year, I am sure he learned his lesson and put lots of extra places to plug in power if your OC needs it! This saves us from waiting until someone figures out the various volt mods we do with trimmers soldered all over the board to give us more volts when and where we need them.

    And I see all the crunchers salivating at the notion of a running a highly overclockable dual proc rig crunching 16 WU's while the 4x GTX295's are folding their a$$es off. If this board came out tomorrow EVGA would sell thru at least a few production runs. Just my two cents fwiw.....

  10. #110
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    2,440
    yea just relax play with clarkdales , gulftowns for a while, then when the novelty wears off theres something else refreshing to push!

  11. #111
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Manchester, NH
    Posts
    67
    Quote Originally Posted by Philly_Boy View Post
    And I see all the crunchers salivating at the notion of a running a highly overclockable dual proc rig crunching 16 WU's while the 4x GTX295's are folding their a$$es off.
    This is what I've been asking Santa for.. I shoulda asked EVGA instead.

  12. #112
    Xtreme CCIE
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    3,842
    Quote Originally Posted by LardArse View Post
    why would qpi be different?

    4.0G @ 20x200 (7.2GT/s @ 4.8 QPI ratio) + 3.6G @ 18 x 200 (7.2GT/s @ 4.8 QPI Ratio)....?
    That is technically possible (I suppose, I could be wrong), but you would have to seriously work to tune it so that those speeds matched exactly, down to the very last Hz (which would be a big problem unless you were willing to accept one of two or three block positions that are likely well under full OC potential). Whether the CPU's expect eachother to operate at the same speed would be a good question as well.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tobit View Post
    Serra: It probably means you can mix different models/speeds of Xeons and you don't have to run matched sets that server boards of old require(d).
    Here's the thing though: no-one has ever let this occur. Not Supermicro, not Tyan, etc. If they don't, I'm not sure it's a good idea to try.


    Actually, the more I think about it, the more I think it would necessarily be a bad idea or not work at all. Let's say you have some threaded code that gets dispatched to each CPU that depends on eachother... if one CPU is dramatically faster than the other, it could finish all of its threads before the other finishes the first, and that could destabilize the whole tower. This is a guess of course (I'm not a software engineer), but I would think there must be scenarios where running multiple CPUs at different frequencies would cause an issue.


    And I still don't see a firm reply about different processors entirely, though I think that if the CPU speed differences pose a problem it pretty much answers that question. Potentially some wiggle room with an over/underclocked set that operate at the same speeds, but that would be a bit of a silly question. I think it seems pretty apparent they do have to be Xeons too, but I'd like to see confirmation on that as well.
    Last edited by Serra; 01-08-2010 at 02:33 PM.
    Dual CCIE (Route\Switch and Security) at your disposal. Have a Cisco-related or other network question? My PM box is always open.

    Xtreme Network:
    - Cisco 3560X-24P PoE Switch
    - Cisco ASA 5505 Firewall
    - Cisco 4402 Wireless LAN Controller
    - Cisco 3502i Access Point

  13. #113
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Mi
    Posts
    1,063
    Quote Originally Posted by Philly_Boy View Post
    I totally agree...Peter, please ignore the haters and continue to develop boards that will make the way for more fun when we overclock!! I mean, for those of us who use LN2, who cares how the sata ports are oriented? Those NF200 chips will get collateral cooling from the GPU pots! C'mon, people...do you see how petty this is? This board has but one purpose - to be rode hard and put away wet!!

    After seeing Peter smoke a custom modded Classy at the Motor City OC Event last year, I am sure he learned his lesson and put lots of extra places to plug in power if your OC needs it! This saves us from waiting until someone figures out the various volt mods we do with trimmers soldered all over the board to give us more volts when and where we need them.

    And I see all the crunchers salivating at the notion of a running a highly overclockable dual proc rig crunching 16 WU's while the 4x GTX295's are folding their a$$es off. If this board came out tomorrow EVGA would sell thru at least a few production runs. Just my two cents fwiw.....


    Thats what I was thinking..!

  14. #114
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    2,440
    Quote Originally Posted by Serra View Post
    That is technically possible (I suppose, I could be wrong), but you would have to seriously work to tune it so that those speeds matched exactly, down to the very last Hz (which would be a big problem unless you were willing to accept one of two or three block positions that are likely well under full OC potential). Whether the CPU's expect eachother to operate at the same speed would be a good question as well.
    you talkin about different qpi? it will be same as stated, cos you cant sync up with different base clocks obviously, but like on many boards, clock gen to clock buffer to cpus, nothing new or extra being done actually

  15. #115
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Stamford, UK
    Posts
    1,336
    Now an AMD version ?
    FX8350 @ 4.0Ghz | 32GB @ DDR3-1200 4-4-4-12 | Asus 990FXA @ 1400Mhz | AMD HD5870 Eyefinity | XFX750W | 6 x 128GB Sandisk Extreme RAID0 @ Aerca 1882ix with 4GB DRAM
    eXceed TJ07 worklog/build

  16. #116
    Back from the Dead
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    6,602
    Wow, a whole lot of uninformed BS going on in here, as usual as of late

    First of all I'd like to thank evga on behalf of the entire DC community, this is what we have been waiting for a LONG time now, almost one year to be exact. You guys rock

    For those that don't seem to have a clue exactly WHO this board was made for, here we go.

    1. Extreme benchers (obviously). There is so much unreleased potential in the DP 1366 platform, with the new soon-to-be released hexacores now more than ever. DP LGA1366 boards have been out for (almost) as long as their single socket counterparts, and so have the CPUs - only until know, there was no way to OC any of the boards past 138Mhz BCLK (yes I have tried them all ).
    So now, for the first time, people can actually unleash the power of Gainestown/Westmere. Combined with 4 GPUs, this motherboard will allow for some insane new World Records. Think 2-3x the performance of current multithreaded CPU benchmarks

    2. Distributed computing maniacs. Needless to say, moar cores + moar mhz equals moar work done, which is what some of us crave way more than chasing the next WR.

    3. Affordable HPC performance for everyone. People used to have to pay top dollar for high end Xeons if they wanted their video/picture/whatever editing machine to pack some punch. Now you can just get the lower end models and OC them by 50-80% just like the standard 920's.

    4. Yes it can play Crysis

    Again, thank you evga.

    Only negative aspect I see is the dual NF200's. I specifically told Dave to make sure this was gonna get dual 5520s to provide for the 72 PCIe lanes, and not those godforsaken power-eating NF200's
    Oh well, you can't have everything. Certainly nothing to prevent me from buying at least one of those monsters.
    Last edited by jcool; 01-08-2010 at 07:49 PM.
    World Community Grid - come join a great team and help us fight for a better tomorrow![size=1]


  17. #117
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    1,374
    guru3d has some nice pics
    ░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█▀▀ ░░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█ ░░░
    ░█▀▀ ░█▀▀ ░█ ░█ ░░░░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█ ░░░
    ░▀▀▀ ░▀ ░░░▀ ░▀▀▀ ░░▀ ░░░▀░▀ ░▀ ░▀▀▀ ░

  18. #118
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,598
    I have to say not even the Rampage III Extreme impressed me this much. This board is :banana::banana::banana::banana: & PLEASURE.

  19. #119
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Stockton, CA
    Posts
    3,569
    Now we need to mod our Cascades for dual evap setups, or just get 2 cascades

  20. #120
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Vancouver,British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    1,178
    If you are a married man,then I would suggest practicing the
    following line:
    Honey, there is somebody else !


    I'd like to see a "budget" version with,no nf200 and half as many PCIe slots,and of course a lower price/power bracket.
    Just like jcool'; I'd like to thank EVGA, and everyone involved
    in making a 2P OCing board come true.

    Hopefully now (that we know the board is coming)
    AMD (their server/workstation dude J.F. to be precise) will change their "Our customers don't need over clocking,they need 24/7 stability" approach.
    How about you give your customers a choice - I know many
    crunchers/folders that want Overclocking and Stability.

    Have fun in Vegas,watch out for Movieman - he might just
    grab this board and run j/k


    World Community Grid's mission is to create the world's largest public computing grid to tackle projects that benefit humanity.
    Our success depends upon individuals collectively contributing their unused computer time to change the world for the better.

  21. #121
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hiding under a blanky with a flash light
    Posts
    192
    Quote Originally Posted by SocketMan View Post
    I'd like to see a "budget" version with,no nf200 and half as many PCIe slots,and of course a lower price/power bracket.

    I desperately want a cruncher box of my own.

  22. #122
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    192
    I'm all for the budget version too! I only run a single card setup, so all that is overkill for me.

    That being said, if there's no budget version I'll probably buy it anyways. I could use the power for my work (video editing). Now what's the best case for it + good cooling (hopefully air, not water)? Any ideas? I've read my ATCS 840 won't fit it, despite being huge itself!

  23. #123
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Madrid, Spain
    Posts
    169
    Quote Originally Posted by LarsMarkelson View Post
    Now what's the best case for it + good cooling (hopefully air, not water)? Any ideas? I've read my ATCS 840 won't fit it, despite being huge itself!
    Same question, will it fit in a Lian Li PC-P80 case? It has 390mm clearance from rear to hard drive cages (~380mm when hard drives are installed due to room needed for connectors).



    Sham, is it exactly a WTX form factor motherboard?


    Isn't it pr0n?
    WORKSTATION || TJ10B-W | i7-3930K C2 | 4x8GB DDR3-2400 CL10 | 2xGTX TITAN 6GB SLI | P1000W || 30" 2560x1600@60hz
    HTPC || GD08B | i7-920 D0 | 3x4GB 2000 CL9 | HD5870 1GB | X25-M 80GB | X-750 || 75" 1920x1080@4x200hz
    NOTEBOOK || P170EM | i7-3820QM | 2x8GB DDR3 1600 CL9 | GTX680M 4GB | HyperX 3K 240GB || 17,3" 1920x1080@60hz
    ULTRABOOK || W130EW | i7-3620QM | 2x8GB DDR3 1600 CL9 | HD4000 | HyperX 3K 240GB || 13,3" 1366x768@60hz

  24. #124
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,192
    Quote Originally Posted by EnJoY View Post
    I just came out of my meeting at the EVGA suite here in Las Vegas and I have some great pictures and new specs to report on this hot board! I was able to have some one on one time with EVGA's Jacob Freeman and Peter Tan (aka Shamino) and was able to see this new board hands-on (a world first).

    [IMG]http://www.techreaction.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/IMG_0083.jpg[/IMG.]


    Please follow me to TechREACTION to get the full report, exclusive new specs & info, and some good shots of the board and EVGA crew.
    Holy smokes. I want one just to have it, with 2 of the 6-cores coming out. I cant for the life of me imagine what I would do with it.

    I hope they tweak the layout some, like side sata connectors.
    Quote Originally Posted by alacheesu View Post
    If you were consistently able to put two pieces of lego together when you were a kid, you should have no trouble replacing the pump top.

  25. #125
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    423
    Quote Originally Posted by jfromeo View Post
    Same question, will it fit in a Lian Li PC-P80 case? It has 390mm clearance from rear to hard drive cages (~380mm when hard drives are installed due to room needed for connectors).
    Mind that I am not an official source but I am still willing to bet parts of my anatomy it will fit this case and all others listed in EVGA E762 FAQ (they are all E-ATX and provide ten PCI brackets). If it doesn't fit this it will not fit any other case in the market.

    Quote Originally Posted by Serra View Post
    That is technically possible (I suppose, I could be wrong), but you would have to seriously work to tune it so that those speeds matched exactly, down to the very last Hz (which would be a big problem unless you were willing to accept one of two or three block positions that are likely well under full OC potential). Whether the CPU's expect eachother to operate at the same speed would be a good question as well.
    I presume both CPUs use the same clock generator so they are automatically synced up base clock wise. All you'd have to take care of is setting matching multipliers for the QPI (and NB?) part of the CPU. The cores are oblivious to what's going on outside their execution instructions and would chug along gleefully at whatever speed they are allowed to by the core multiplier.
    Last edited by sholvaco; 01-09-2010 at 02:42 AM.

Page 5 of 12 FirstFirst ... 2345678 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •