Fake or not, we need competition... badly.
Fake or not, we need competition... badly.
I just felt this needed a bump for extra attention. This is significant news yet it has mostly gone ignored for the last page!Originally Posted by Florinmocanu
Here is one more for the road...
Larrabee unleashed to the public.
Can't wait for Larrabee!
Phenon II x4 955 (3.7ghz)/athlon II x2 245 (3.7ghz), Mugen 2 , gigabyte 790xt ud4p, 5770 1000/1420 , 4GB ddr3
http://superclock.mysmf.com 5770 1ghz bench
evga failed
Nordichardware says it's fake, according to their sources.
http://www.nordichardware.se/nyhet,17011.html
(swedish)
Project TJ07 WeeMaan edition in progress...
i7 920 @ 4,4ghz, P6T Deluxe, Corsair Dominator 6Gb, HD5870, OCZ Vertex 60gb + Samsung F1 1tb
Heatkiller copper, EK 5870, Thermochill 120.4, DDC 3.2
You do realise it was a joke right?
Project TJ07 WeeMaan edition in progress...
i7 920 @ 4,4ghz, P6T Deluxe, Corsair Dominator 6Gb, HD5870, OCZ Vertex 60gb + Samsung F1 1tb
Heatkiller copper, EK 5870, Thermochill 120.4, DDC 3.2
IF these were real leaks, just like with anything released by a company you DO NOT compare it to the opposition. What you would do is compare it to the 295. Since you know they are not going to post bad scores of their own hardware
Taking that into consideration it peforms what about 30-40% better than a 295.
With most review sites using updated drivers now, I am seeing plenty of results where the 5970 DOUBLES 295 performance. Not 30-40% 100%!
Now before any ATI guys go shouting from the roof tops that 5970 is king and still will be in 6 months... these 300 series are speculation ATM, until someone actually has them in hand and can bench them, it is all FUD. 300 series could double 295 performance as well.
LOL at the larry benchmark
Actually I prefer this one!
LOL at the larry benchmark
Last edited by Shadov; 12-14-2009 at 09:19 AM.
Your pic and link doesn't work.
S3 doing a slightly unexpected comeback, coming from out of the blue and kicking everyone's butt?Actually I prefer this one!
Main Rig: Phenom II X6 1055T 95W @3562 (285x12.5) MHz, Corsair XMS2 DDR2 (2x2GB), Gigabyte HD7970 OC (1000 MHz) 3GB, ASUS M3A78-EM,
Corsair F60 60 GB SSD + various HDDs, Corsair HX650 (3.3V/20A, 5V/20A, 12V/54A), Antec P180 Mini
Notebook: HP ProBook 6465b w/ A6-3410MX and 8GB DDR3 1600
Biggest clue that this is fake if you were to look at a glance: GeForce GTX 300
They will be calling it GF100 sorry to burst your bubble (anyone that bought into this).
Ummm. I thought GF100 is the internal codename and it will be released in the GTX-300-series. Otherwise it wouldn't make sense to rename the GT 210 to GT 310
Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks
close this thread !
When AMD had 64-bit and Intel had only 32-bit, they tried to tell the world there was no need for 64-bit. Until they got 64-bit.
When AMD had IMC and Intel had FSB, they told the world "there is plenty of life left in the FSB" (actual quote, and yes, they had *math* to show it had more bandwidth). Until they got an IMC.
When AMD had dual core and Intel had single core, they told the world that consumers don't need multi core. Until they got dual core.
When intel was using MCM, they said it was a better solution than native dies. Until they got native dies. (To be fair, we knocked *unconnected* MCM, and still do, we never knocked MCM as a technology, so hold your flames.)by John Fruehe
Why?????
All one has to do is stop reading and replying to it and it will kill it's self.... hmm,people must like this thread.
+1All one has to do is stop reading and replying to it and it will kill it's self.... hmm,
umm....
Ummm. I thought GF100 is the internal codename and it will be released in the GTX-300-series. Otherwise it wouldn't make sense to rename the GT 210 to GT 310
At least simple people are not confused with ATIs codenames Being all large conifers
All one has to do is stop reading and replying to it and it will kill it's self.... hmm,
It wouldn't surprise me to find that Stanbony and R3APERvsTYETREE of YouTube created those benchmarks.
Huge Nvidia fanboys, they posted the fake Fermi benchmarks that appeared before 5870's launch and the word screwup
Except that you wouldn't have to hope or wonder about the legitimacy of these graphs if you actually had a source.
Yes you are right I made a mistake but its not 'gtx' anymore. Anyone under NDA or if the person made that should have known Nvidia officially said they are moving away from GTX name. Its internal GF100 and and speculated to be called GT 380 /GT 360 by nvidia focus members on couple forums.Ummm. I thought GF100 is the internal codename and it will be released in the GTX-300-series. Otherwise it wouldn't make sense to rename the GT 210 to GT 310
if the benches arent real then whys amd preparing 5890/5990 for fermi arrival ??
no need for them spend time/resources for pointless releases
theyll need pumped up 5890/5990 for fermi arrival
Umm, because like everyone else they know that Fermi will be faster than 5870 or there would be no point in even launching it.
not because AMD thinks this bench is real
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Yeah , the source said GTX380 Performance is much higher
Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.8GHZ 1.28V (Core Contact Freezer)
Asus X58 P6T
6GB OCZ Gold DDR3-1600MHZ 8-8-8-24
XFX HD5870
WD 1TB Black HD
Corsair 850TX
Cooler Master HAF 922
OCUK got in trouble last year for leaking i7 975 and 4890 numbers (which I verified). So if these come from OCUK (they are a reasonable sized PC/Component shop) so it is feasible that they have one in for testing. However, I will wait and see until I have a card on my bench or at least more reliable sources.
Intel i7 920 C0 @ 3.67GHz
ASUS 6T Deluxe
Powercolor 7970 @ 1050/1475
12GB GSkill Ripjaws
Antec 850W TruePower Quattro
50" Full HD PDP
Red Cosmos 1000
If benchs aren't real that does not mean fermi will not beat the 5870/5970, it just means that the benchs shown are not real.
Fermi has the potential to beat 5870... ATi is simply covering their bases, if fermi is faster than 5870, 5890 may come close to fermi and if its faster than 5970, 5990 maybe the replay.
But this time the OCUK forum member has total of 12 posts...!!!
Last edited by ajaidev; 12-14-2009 at 11:29 AM.
Coming Soon
LOOOL
How come that guy is still in those forums lol Hes believing that the guy named "successful troll" has some internal relations with nVidia LOL And hes believing in that guys name LOL Do you dream about the guy in your avatar or its you?
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks