Page 1 of 13 123411 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 302

Thread: FERMI Benchmarked?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast StAndrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Chesapeake, Va
    Posts
    566

    FERMI Benchmarked?

    Found here: http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showforum=172

    Original source: http://www.guru3d.com/news/geforce-g...80-benchmarks/

    Do not ask us how or where these benchmarks source/originate from as we do not know. For all we care they are fake. However, a user in our forums posted screenshots of benchmarks from what seems to be a NVIDIA Slide Deck presentation. I can confirm that the layout and style is exactly what NVIDIA uses for it's presentations.

    The slides reveal internal NVIDIA benchmarks of Far Cry 2, Resident Evil 5 and STALKER Clear Sky. Now this remains speculation, but if the numbers are right, then the future is looking bright and sunny for NVIDIA -- well if they get their pricing and TDP right that is.

    Anyway, have a look and props go out to forum user "Memorian" for posting these in this GTX 300 series discussion thread.
    To reiterate, take with a grain of salt...

    But if true...
    Last edited by StAndrew; 12-13-2009 at 07:58 AM.
    Thermaltake Armor
    Q9650 @ 4050 (1800 FSB)
    4BG Patriot 2000 8-8-8-26
    Striker II Extreme
    9800 GTX+ TRI SLI
    x2 WD VRaptor RAID 0: Vista 64 Ult
    x2 Segate 320 RAID 0: Data
    -1TB and 750GB Western Digital Mybooks for backup


    FuZion 2.0
    Enzotech NB Block
    Swiftech Obsidians x 3
    Black Ice GT Stealth 240 and 120
    DangerDen 120 Xflow rad
    Swiftech D5 with EK Rev 2 top
    1/2" tubing

  2. #2
    Xtreme Mentor ajaidev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,624
    Holy crap...!!! GTX360 </> 5970

    Dam 5870 is not even in the picture wtf??

    Seems fake tough

    If GTX 380 performs sooo well how will GTX390/5 perform 280 fps in RE5 :O

    These are very unlikely just like the first fermi demos that appeared!!
    Coming Soon

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast NaMcO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    811
    Wouldn't surprise me at all... But rather wait and see actual card benches than commenting on those.
    ASUS Sabertooth P67B3· nVidia GTX580 1536MB PhysX · Intel Core i7 2600K 4.5GHz · Corsair TX850W · Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
    8GB GSKill Sniper PC3-16000 7-8-7 · OCZ Agility3 SSD 240GB + Intel 320 SSD 160GB + Samsung F3 2TB + WD 640AAKS 640GB · Corsair 650D · DELL U2711 27"

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict Helmore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    I'll keep these benchmarks numbers in the "seems plausible" category of rumors. One thing of note though, the GTX380 is actually more than twice as fast as the GTX285. Quite an achievement if that turns out to be true.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  5. #5

    ...

    Seems fake, take a look at the same benchmarks with HD 5870 and HD 5970:





    And now compare to:



    Last edited by Shadov; 12-13-2009 at 08:10 AM.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict N19h7m4r3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Curragh.
    Posts
    1,292
    Very interesting.

    But I don't believe them really.

    If this was the case, why would NV not just send a card or 2 out to review sites.

    That would cause all doubt to be erased and get more people to wait for Fermi.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by N19h7m4r3 View Post
    Very interesting.

    But I don't believe them really.

    If this was the case, why would NV not just send a card or 2 out to review sites.

    That would cause all doubt to be erased and get more people to wait for Fermi.
    NDA maybe, but yes, they could send 1 or 2 out then with the "leaked" scores...

  8. #8
    I am Xtreme zalbard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    8,761
    PR crap probably.
    ATI had some mind blowing performance graphics, too, iirc.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Enthusiast NaMcO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    811
    Those PCLAB.PL graphics are a joke, my 295 performs way better than what they claim at those settings. I think right now anyone can throw out fermi benchmarks because nobody knows how they perform but on the other hand many people know how 5870 and 295 perform and can smell fake benches by a mile.
    ASUS Sabertooth P67B3· nVidia GTX580 1536MB PhysX · Intel Core i7 2600K 4.5GHz · Corsair TX850W · Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
    8GB GSKill Sniper PC3-16000 7-8-7 · OCZ Agility3 SSD 240GB + Intel 320 SSD 160GB + Samsung F3 2TB + WD 640AAKS 640GB · Corsair 650D · DELL U2711 27"

  10. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    love this kinda anonymous benchs lol

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,023
    would like to see AF benchmarks, AA is becoming a bit of old hat now that higher and higher resolutions are being used.
    i7 920 @ 4GHz 1.25v
    GTX 470 @ 859MHz 1062mv

  12. #12
    Xtreme Mentor ajaidev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,624
    This guy at a Chinese forum made an excellent point he edited the slides and put these up lol







    I hope fermi gets out soon... or else people are gonna mock it like above.
    Coming Soon

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    damn hemlock rocks in sec test must be some error there :P

  14. #14
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    752
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadov View Post
    Seems fake, take a look at the same benchmarks with HD 5870 and HD 5970:





    And now compare to:



    You obviously CAN'T compare yourself. The Stalker clear sky settings are different - 8AA vs 0AA

    and the Far Cry 2 ones are basically identical - settings and fps wise... seems plausible to me

  15. #15
    Xtreme Member Genius_pt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    119
    Wow, if true not bad really.

    Finally we get some good explanations (amazing performance) for the amount of time we've waited for this cards .
    Q6600@3,8ghz Asus Blitz Formula SE, 2gb gskill hk 4-4-3-5 @950mhz, EVGA 9800GTX+


  16. #16
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    there are ppl who believe this crap thats even amazing :P clocks aren't fnalized but somehow we already have gtx 360 and 380

  17. #17
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    752
    why SHOULDN'T we believe it

    g80 was such a massive jump over g70, why can't fermi be a similar if not even larger jump over the gtx280?


    just because it hasn't happened doesn't mean it can't


    yes its unlikely, but stop being so pessimistic towards everything

  18. #18
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    slides look too cheap imho don't know if those were real nvidia would be probably the one posting it all over the net

  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict Luka_Aveiro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,020
    Results seem plausible, more than doubled performance compared to GTX285.
    Are we there yet?

  20. #20
    Xtreme Addict JohnZS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,597
    Holy smokes Batman!!! I hope this IS true
    Stop looking at the walls, look out the window

  21. #21
    Xtreme Addict N19h7m4r3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Curragh.
    Posts
    1,292
    I just want the GTX 380 to use a single 6 or 8pin power connector and be at MOST 9.5"

  22. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    52
    Well.. I remember somewhere on the internet... here: http://www.semiaccurate.com/2009/12/...-silicon-oven/
    some info about insider saying the targeted clock at 750Mhz would make fermi about 40% faster than cypress.
    But their A2 silicons was only able to reach 500Mhz.. which means 50% more clockspeed to go... They just got A3 and ya think it will clock at 750Mhz?

    These numbers showing increase in performance of way beyond 50-70% over the cypress is something I am prolly not gonna put my faith on.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Addict JohnZS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,597
    But bladerash there is a clue in the name of that website... SEMI-accurate lets hope they hit 600Mhz and wanted to go the whole at least 700Mhz hog with A3!
    Stop looking at the walls, look out the window

  24. #24
    Xtreme Cruncher Chumbucket843's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bloomfield
    Posts
    1,968
    here are some fakes i found. note how the vram is incorrect with the bus widths. take benchies like these with a grain of salt.


  25. #25
    Xtreme Mentor ajaidev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,624
    @Chumbucket843 there were specs there also lol fake specs


    Specifications

    GTX 380
    CUDA cores 512
    core clock 730MHz
    shader clock 1600MHz
    Memory 1100MHz 2GB
    TDP(watts) 225w

    GTX 360
    CUDA cores 480
    core clock 650MHz
    shader clock 1400MHz
    Memory 1000MHz 1.8GB
    TDP(watts) 195w

    http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/27...-gtx380-gtx360
    Coming Soon

Page 1 of 13 123411 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •