FERMI Benchmarked?

[Solus Corvus]

i would love to see fermi own ATI, nothing is wrong with jumps in performance. i dont care which company does it, cause in the end, it means better prices per frame for us.

Certainly, progress is good from either company. But we should still be realistic about how likely a given level of progress is.

[dengyong]

This needs to be repost on every page or at least edited into the OP until some mod shuts this thread down. Although it's amusing seeing people see the first page and post a reply OMG REAL!111

Even if it's not true, it's been entertaining.

[zerazax]

Even if it's not true, it's been entertaining.

The best is when people "break this news" in a new thread a week later, citing these as pure evidence

[SamHughe]

What?

THIS

[lkiller123]

No, it's 16x AF

AA is off

Oops, gotta learn how to read next time

[Vit^pr0n]

THIS

That's quality

[randomizer]

Even if it's not true, it's been entertaining.

Well considering the THG charts are fake (and I am 100% certain of this as THG has never had any articles on GTX 3xx), why would the supposed NVIDIA ones be any more real? Guru3D really should have checked their facts first.

[Decami]

What the hell is this supposed to mean?

maybe you were only focusing on that point of the post rather than what the whole post meant. being that you quoted just that sentence.

It means if true, 5000 series will drop heavily in price second hand, making them cheap "monster" performing cards. which is obviously a good thing.

[Vit^pr0n]

maybe you were only focusing on that point of the post rather than what the whole post meant. being that you quoted just that sentence.

It means if true, 5000 series will drop heavily in price second hand, making them cheap "monster" performing cards. which is obviously a good thing.

One could only dream this was true. Imagine getting GTX295 performance for under $300, or even $200 depending on how aggressive Nvidia prices their cards? It would be madness! And a great benefit to EVERYONE as it will truly open up PC gaming to much MUCH more people.

Then again.. sadly, this is a fake slide

[ajaidev]

THIS

Was wondering since 5870 does run a bit hot and so will most likely fermi, how hot do ur ballz run you need a heat-sink for that...

[Florinmocanu]

obviously, waterblock. Duhhhh

[WeeMaan]

Was wondering since 5870 does run a bit hot and so will most likely fermi, how hot do ur ballz run you need a heat-sink for that...

Heatsink?? Pfft, LN2 at the very least.

[003]

Will be fun to bump this in a few months. I actually love saying I told you so.

Bump it for what? To be a troll? My post is already skeptical of the legitimacy, even though I would like it to be true.

[Anemic]

THIS

Hahahaha, pure entertainment

[safan80]

Was wondering since 5870 does run a bit hot and so will most likely fermi, how hot do ur ballz run you need a heat-sink for that...

lol on the second part.
the 5870s fan profile is the problem.
You guys know you can adjust the default fan speed on the the stock coolers right? I use MSI afterburner's default profile manual control profile The gpus at the 5970 idle around 34C and load they not go beyond 70C. I even ran my 285s at above stock fan speed. Under load they required 100%, the the gpu temps on those were 80C-85C. It's too bad Nvidia likes to stick with crappy fans on their coolers. I'm not even going to talk about them still using aluminum

[Piotrsama]

Bump it for what? To be a troll? My post is already skeptical of the legitimacy, even though I would like it to be true.

Yes, very skeptical
Let's read it again...

Looks legit to me. In the one you posted the 5970 gets 78.3fps in FC2 at 1920x1200 with 8xAA. In the Nvidia slide it gets 77fps with the same settings.

[randomizer]

Bump it for what? To be a troll? My post is already skeptical of the legitimacy, even though I would like it to be true.

Why are you skeptical of its legitimacy? There is nothing to be a skeptic about. There is nothing about these slides that could cause even the slightest doubt that they are fake. They are simply a more official-looking remake of the 1920x1200 data in the THG graphs (well the Far Cry one is) which as I have said more than once on several forums are completely fake as well.

[Xoulz]

Nobody benchmarked blockbuster games like Batman: Arkham Asylum with innovative features like PhysX® technology?

You own me a new shirt... I coughed up my coffee just now, laughing at that^^... thnx!

[kurt124]

i think every benchmark on the new cards are rubbish anyway even if they are true. for me i think its all down to how they perform in DX11 especially as i will be upgrading when all new games will be DX11. wait till DX11 beenchmarks are out then we'll see who really has the monster cards. end of thread!

[SimBy]

successful_troll is laughing his ass off

[Tao~]

well this may be fake but i would expect that kind of numbers from fermi, i mean what less for 512 shaders , thats more than 2x GT285
5970 and 5870 numbers dont seem genuine, c'mon GTX360 matching 5970 is blasphemy

[randomizer]

successful_troll is laughing his ass off

That he is

[Florinmocanu]

Look what Cartman crapped...

[kurt124]

Nice one

[Florinmocanu]

I can doo more..