FERMI Benchmarked?

[kadozer]

Guru3D Hilbert Hagedoorn obviously knew the slides are fake so why does he use a forum post by NVIDIA fanboy as news, obviously getting the hits is more important to him than credible news.

Maybe somebody should post at GURU3D forum some ATI HD 5890 slides with awesome performance beating GTX380 and see if Hilbert will use it as news.

The reason is, I believe the ATI fanboys deserve at least the same excitement as the NVIDIA fanboys are getting from the NVIDIA fake slides in this thread, so why not post some fakes for them.

True but I don't know what would get ATI fanboys excited anymore at this point maybe an XTX 58xx version that does good handjobs?

[tbone8ty]

get ready for ATI optimized drivers!

[Heinz68]

True but I don't know what would get ATI fanboys excited anymore at this point maybe an XTX 58xx version that does good handjobs?

If Guru3D Hilbert Hagedoorn will post it in his news section, it's OK with me.

[annihilat0r]

If you only could... supply here in europe is anemic... and cards sell for 400-500€

I was lucky that i scored my Powercolor LCS for only 420€... price gouging right now is insane... you pay the same price i did, for a plain vanilla HD5870.

If supply is still that low next year i might can sell my card for more then i bought it.

you paid 420 euros for a HD5870? :S

I paid something like 350 dollars plus VAT

[safan80]

1920x1200 could be cpu limited in Nvidia's benchmarks. The 5970 does not really shine till you give it 2560x1600 to play with. If the GTX380 could bloe the 5970 away at 2560x1600 then I was be impressed. If it only ties the 5970 why wait 6 months for something you could have now?

[Solus Corvus]

you paid 420 euros for a HD5870? :S

I paid something like 350 dollars plus VAT

Did your HIS come with a full cover water block? Didn't think so.

[Hornet331]

you paid 420 euros for a HD5870? :S

I paid something like 350 dollars plus VAT

including EK acetal/nickel water block, so i acutally payed only 330€ since the block alone costs 90€ here.

[Jamesrt2004]

Doesn't matter fake or legit or trick,
the real thing we know it's faster than 5870, but how much faster
The only concern me is the price , release the dam price chart would you nvidia

+1 we know it will be pretty much 99% but it will sell on price point.. its its 50% more expensive and only 25% faster then.. well only the hardcore will buy it...

and even then I still think ati have a LOT of room to wiggle on price

Note, the benchmarks are Nvidia friendly games. Even if these are accurate benchmarks, I doubt the performance would be so good across ALL games.

Also, its not so off the wall for GF100 benchmarks at this point. Its not more than a few days ago that Nvidia's Tom Petersen was showing off his GF100 SLI rig, so Nvidia def has some working cards.

But like I said, its all hearsay at this point. No reason to get wound up until the cards are finally released (at least a paper launch).

its just suspicious seeming its NOT an nvidia slide (is obv comparing them to their others/old slide) and also its posted by a guy called "some troll" iirc :/

[StAndrew]

Note, the benchmarks are Nvidia friendly games. Even if these are accurate benchmarks, I doubt the performance would be so good across ALL games.

Also, its not so off the wall for GF100 benchmarks at this point. Its not more than a few days ago that Nvidia's Tom Petersen was showing off his GF100 SLI rig, so Nvidia def has some working cards.

But like I said, its all hearsay at this point. No reason to get wound up until the cards are finally released (at least a paper launch).

One thing I will say, these better not be too far from the truth, or Nvidia will be faced with a R600 of their own...

[Jamesrt2004]

If you only could... supply here in europe is anemic... and cards sell for 400-500€

I was lucky that i scored my Powercolor LCS for only 420€... price gouging right now is insane... you pay the same price i did, for a plain vanilla HD5870.

If supply is still that low next year i might can sell my card for more then i bought it.

I would... if you got a spare to tie you over till when gf300 is out and the inevitable price PLUMMET (like 4 series it wasnt even a drop lol was like half the price ) then re-purchase

[randomizer]

Nobody benchmarked blockbuster games like Batman: Arkham Asylum with innovative features like PhysX® technology?

[lkiller123]

Umm, holy crap. Does that mean the GTX380 will be priced at ~$600?

[SamHughe]

Don't make me bring out Sam's balls benchmark graphics again. Sick and tired of this useless Fermi threads with fake graphs and info.

[Lokinhow]

Well, I think it is fake.



Stalker CS, maximum settings, 1920x1200, and a GTX295 with 63 fps? HD5870 57 fps?

back to reallity

[safan80]

Don't make me bring out Sam's balls benchmark graphics again. Sick and tired of this useless Fermi threads with fake graphs and info.

With all the Marketing Nvidia is doing you need to prepare a graphic

[randomizer]

It could be a different benchmark run. If I look at the sky the whole time my framerate looks much better.

[m.fox]

Don't make me bring out Sam's balls benchmark graphics again.

What?

[safan80]

On the different hardware forums it's funny how many Nvidia users have started listing their cards as of today

[Lokinhow]

It could be a different benchmark run. If I look at the sky the whole time my framerate looks much better.

yeah, but if you do this the benchmark turn pointless

Stalker CS is a very demanding game, 57 fps with a HD5870, maximum settings @ 1920x1200? The only way is like you said "look at the sky the whole time"

[Solus Corvus]

If the 40% faster then Cypress claim is true then the numbers for GTX380 would be 132, 80, and 80 for RE5, S:CS, and FC2 respectively. Impressive, but still slightly behind the 5970.

[Manicdan]

i would love to see fermi own ATI, nothing is wrong with jumps in performance. i dont care which company does it, cause in the end, it means better prices per frame for us.

however guys who think its not possible to get a good jump just on architecture, 3879 to 4870 was quite shocking and did just that. however i will also say i dont believe these benchmarks. just looking at the really bad xfire scaling, its looking to be way to much marketing BS and not enough truth. and honestly if it is accurate, then once ATI gets the xfire drivers good and we see 80% scaling instead of the 30% shown, then it puts 380 right between 5870 and 5970, which is what we all expected. (basically if they removed 5970 from the charts, would any of us really be surprised by the numbers?)

[lkiller123]

Well, I think it is fake.



Stalker CS, maximum settings, 1920x1200, and a GTX295 with 63 fps? HD5870 57 fps?

back to reallity

Isn't the second chart 16x AA?

[HDCHOPPER]

LOL yall 6 pages in hours ...& the degree of careing is astounding !

Heres to compitition and priceing because in a year or two I will get a fermi card from one of you for a great price

[zerazax]

These graphs were originally posted in a forum by a guy with the user name of "successful troll". I'm surprised guru3d made an article of this crap.

This needs to be repost on every page or at least edited into the OP until some mod shuts this thread down. Although it's amusing seeing people see the first page and post a reply OMG REAL!111

[Lokinhow]

Isn't the second chart 16x AA?

No, it's 16x AF

AA is off