A Semi-accurate Look into Fermi

[003]

Sure dude. Considering that you have never shown that you have any real connections in the industry and your past predictions were way off the mark - I'd suggest that it is just as likely that you read Charlie's article, liked what you saw, and ran with it. Especially since your brand new "insider info" only came out after charlie's article and doesn't contain any new information. You could resolve this by simply giving a bit of info that hasn't been publicly posted before, but we all know that isn't going to happen.

I have been talking about this way before this article was published on OCN, actually. I am not the one who is actually under NDA. My information comes from another person who is under NDA who has breached it by telling me and for that reason I do not feel comfortable revealing any details or sources as it may be linked back to the person who told me.

This is all petty and irrelevant though. This entire argument will be laid to rest come Q1. Again, what I have said in the past was all speculation on my part and that was before I had contact with the source under NDA.

I am putting my reputation on the line here if this doesn't come true. It will though and that is why I am completely confident in saying what I am.

[G0ldBr1ck]

I have been talking about this way before this article was published on OCN, actually. I am not the one who is actually under NDA. My information comes from another person who is under NDA who has breached it by telling me and for that reason I do not feel comfortable revealing any details or sources as it may be linked back to the person who told me.

This is all petty and irrelevant though. This entire argument will be laid to rest come Q1. Again, what I have said in the past was all speculation on my part and that was before I had contact with the source under NDA.

I am putting my reputation on the line here if this doesn't come true. It will though and that is why I am completely confident in saying what I am.

The past info on Fermi that you provided that was incorect was not spoken as speculation but as facts that you had much like what your saying now.

Im not saying I dont appreciate the info you try to give us, but when you do not acknowledge that it is only speculation. It makes it realy hard to put much faith into what your saying now.

[003]

The past info on Fermi that you provided that was incorect was not spoken as speculation but as facts that you had much like what your saying now.

Im not saying I dont appreciate the info you try to give us, but when you do not acknowledge that it is only speculation. It makes it realy hard to put much faith into what your saying now.

My previous statements were stated as "facts" only because I really wanted them to be true. I didn't have any additional information as I do now. What I am presently saying is not speculation.