MMM
Page 15 of 16 FirstFirst ... 51213141516 LastLast
Results 351 to 375 of 389

Thread: 5900 series behind the corner

  1. #351
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    I don't think we are talking about the same thing.

    This card is supposedly = 2x HD 5870 cores underclocked to HD 5850 specs.

    Bandwidth (on paper) should therefore be ~ the same as two HD 5850 1GB cards.

    Therefore this card should = 2x HD 5850 (+/-). However, in higher resolutions in DX10 games, it looks to be getting spanked by two HD 5850 cards.

    .
    .
    .
    .

    As for "driver issues", I don't play along with that. In newer games, sure. However, we are talking about HawX DX10 and Far Cry 2 DX10...two games that were released months and months and months ago. If ATI is having "driver issues", that is simply an embarrassment of epic proportions.
    Ok, so lets assume u're hypothese is right that the timings went up. What is the voltage of GDDR5 on the HD5850, u know now that the voltage on the 5970's GDDR5 is 1.10V

  2. #352
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Romania, lab501.ro
    Posts
    1,707
    SKYMTL - It is not 2 x HD5850. It is 2 x HD5870 with HD 5850 clocks. A small difference between 1440 stream procesors and 1600 stream processor, and 72 texture units, versus 80 texture units. Even with lower GPU clocks, one GPU from 5970 is still capable of more calculus compared to 5850. Anyway, overclock the card to 725/1200. You will have a nice surprise

    Quote Originally Posted by Atenuu
    Look at those overclockers that do 1300-1400 core with only 1250-1300 MHz memory. And still have a huge boost. at the start i thought the RV870 and the RV840 where memory bandwith bottelneked but if you look at the OC results you gain way more by overclocking the core.
    Overclocking and 2560x1600 have nothing in common. This card is a beast in 1680x1050 and 1920x1200 and in benchmarks. The problems start with 2560x1600. Now, when we run 2k3, 2k5, 2k6 or Vantage for ranking, the resolution is either 1024x768, or 1280x1024. No bandwidth issues there
    Weissbier - breakfast of champions



  3. #353
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,128
    I am very pissed.

    1: Frame time is roughly; CPU time + RAM time + interconnect time(CPU/NB <-> GPU) + GPU time + VRAM time. Understood?
    2: CPU time does not change regardless of the resolution, unless CPU is doing per pixel ops. AI, Input handling, event handling, physics, game state updates, game world updates etc aren't tied to resolution.
    3: GPU time is directly porpotional to the game's visual quality settings and resolution.

    But hey, just overclock the FRAMEBUFFER to see if it helps.

    Last edited by Calmatory; 11-17-2009 at 08:42 AM.

  4. #354
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by Monstru View Post
    SKYMTL - It is not 2 x HD5850. It is 2 x HD5870 with HD 5850 clocks. A small difference between 1440 stream procesors and 1600 stream processor, and 72 texture units, versus 80 texture units. Even with lower GPU clocks, one GPU from 5970 is still capable of more calculus compared to 5850.
    You and I just said the same thing.

    My point was that on paper, the HD 5970 has better specs than 2x HD 5850 yet gets beaten out by the dual card configuration due to what seems like bandwidth issues. I was wondering out loud where those limitations came from considering the clock speeds.

  5. #355
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Romania, lab501.ro
    Posts
    1,707
    SKYMTL - Ok, I get your point

    Calmatory - Carefull with that "physics" word on this thread =))
    Weissbier - breakfast of champions



  6. #356
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    You and I just said the same thing.

    My point was that on paper, the HD 5970 has better specs than 2x HD 5850 yet gets beaten out by the dual card configuration due to what seems like bandwidth issues. I was wondering out loud where those limitations came from considering the clock speeds.
    is it possible the PCIe slot is being the bottleneck? when you run x2 configs, are those at 8x or 16x each?

  7. #357
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    is it possible the PCIe slot is being the bottleneck? when you run x2 configs, are those at 8x or 16x each?
    You make a good point. It actually may not be the slot being the bottleneck but rather the PLX chip.

  8. #358
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    166
    Maybe you could determine the size of the bus by the number of memory chips plus some info from their datasheets.

  9. #359
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    You make a good point. It actually may not be the slot being the bottleneck but rather the PLX chip.
    I dont think its the PLX chip, the plx chip basically makes the 16x pcie slot into two 8x slots.

    So that means performance similar as 5850 crossfire on say a 780X/780GX/P55. But if one uses PLX on a 8x PCIe the 8x speed will go down to 4x.

    5850 CF with 780X/780GX gives similar performance as 5850 CF + 780FX so i dont think PLX is a issue.
    Coming Soon

  10. #360
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    ok seems i am gonna wait for pro reviewers lol first its 128 bit then its undervoltaged now plx isn't enough

  11. #361
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Romania, lab501.ro
    Posts
    1,707
    Quote Originally Posted by thebluemeanie1 View Post
    Maybe you could determine the size of the bus by the number of memory chips plus some info from their datasheets.
    The bus is 2 x 256 bit, one 256 bit for each GPU. That is certain.

    PLX should be enough, it was used with succes on HD 4870 X2, and this is "the new and impproved gen2" chip
    Weissbier - breakfast of champions



  12. #362
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Maryland - US
    Posts
    96
    Thought I'd share some google findings enjoy

    http://www.hardwarezone.com.sg/artic...?cid=3&id=3072

    Cooler Master Stacker 810 WATERCOOLED
    Black Ice GTX 360 // Danger Den TDX CPU WB //
    Maze 4 GPU WB // D5 Pump // SwifTech Micro Res.
    ASUS P5B DELUXE // E8400 @ 4410MHz 490*9 1.41v
    2x2GB MUSHKIN ASCENT DDR2 1066
    SAPPHIRE OC HD5970 2Gb @ 900-1150
    Corsair HX1000w // SB Audigy 4

  13. #363
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    ok seems i am gonna wait for pro reviewers lol first its 128 bit then its undervoltaged now plx isn't enough
    It was a discussion. No one was stating anything for a fact.

  14. #364
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post
    So that means performance similar as 5850 crossfire on say a 780X/780GX/P55. But if one uses PLX on a 8x PCIe the 8x speed will go down to 4x.
    That was true for the Gen 1 PLX switch. I'm not sure however if it is also true for the one used on the HD 5970 (Gen II).

  15. #365
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    707
    Doesn't make sense to me to even consider this card to have a 128 bit memory bus. That would mean that it is using a new variation of silicon (a new die) or the memory bus was clipped in half. Neither is plausible.

    The card itself, somewhat disappointing to me based on what I've seen so far. I don't really see a problem with the length though, if you plan on putting a 300 watt card in a smallish case you are just asking for problems.

  16. #366
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by eleeter View Post
    I don't really see a problem with the length though, if you plan on putting a 300 watt card in a smallish case you are just asking for problems.
    i think they would call that "introduction to building a bomb the wrong way"

  17. #367
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    300 watt is not a problem, as long as your PSU can deliver (and most do), and the cooler can keep the card cool. But you can always upgrade the case-cooling/airflow, or the GPU-cooler, anyways.

    The performance is the most important, can it match (or at least get close to) the 2 x 5870 will decide how good it will sell, I believe.
    Last edited by Sam_oslo; 11-17-2009 at 01:14 PM.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  18. #368
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    how good it will sell, I belive.
    I think they will sell every one they make for about the next 5-6 months
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  19. #369
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    I think they will sell every one they make for about the next 5-6 months
    Why would you buy this in this price if it can't deliver (or get close) to 2 x 5870?

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  20. #370
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    'Zona
    Posts
    2,346
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    Why would you buy this in this price if it can't deliver (or get close) to 2 x 5870?
    Because it is about 80% the price of 5870CF and only needs a single PCI-e slot.
    Edit- Or 75% of the price, if you go off the $399 per 5870 and $599 for the 5970.
    Originally Posted by motown_steve
    Every genocide that was committed during the 20th century has been preceded by the disarmament of the target population. Once the government outlaws your guns your life becomes a luxury afforded to you by the state. You become a tool to benefit the state. Should you cease to benefit the state or even worse become an annoyance or even a hindrance to the state then your life becomes more trouble than it is worth.

    Once the government outlaws your guns your life is forfeit. You're already dead, it's just a question of when they are going to get around to you.

  21. #371
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    Because it is about 80% the price of 5870CF and only needs a single PCI-e slot.
    Edit- Or 75% of the price, if you go off the $399 per 5870 and $599 for the 5970.
    to better describe it, you save 20-25% compared to buying 2 cards individually

    and save 2 slots.

  22. #372
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    mars
    Posts
    785
    Quote Originally Posted by eleeter View Post
    I don't really see a problem with the length though, if you plan on putting a 300 watt card in a smallish case you are just asking for problems.
    besides all those hardware case must carry cooling system. my has dual loop watercooling internal, and 2 reservoirs in the middle so i have only 28 cm space for video.
    and now i am in doubt what to choose - 5970 and do a little mod in case or get 5870 in cross.
    length may be an issue for many i think.

    Intel Xeon W3520 4200MHz HT
    Foxconn Bloodrage
    3x2Gb Patriot Viper II DDR3-1600 6-6-6-16
    MSI GTX480 M2D15 850/1700/2000
    Samsung F1 1TB
    Corsair TX950W
    Stacker 832 w/ Dual Loop Watercooling aka *Bong Build*
    NEC 2690WUXi
    Loop 1: Laing DDC1-T -> Watercool HK 3.0 LT -> Thermochill PA120.3 -> Bloodrage NB -> EK Res 150
    Loop 2: Laing DDC1-T -> EK-FC GTX480 -> Thermochill PA120.2 -> EK Res 150


    *New* CM 690 II Advanced Watercooled


    *Coming soon* Stacker 832 Rebirth!

  23. #373
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    511
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    Why would you buy this in this price if it can't deliver (or get close) to 2 x 5870?
    also knowing this card can overclock to the speeds of the 5870 and get you the performance you're looking for...

    ati only downclocked it to get the TDP it wanted..they show you that the core can go higher and the cooler is rated to cool 400w compared to the 300w its producing now.

  24. #374
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by InCredible View Post
    also knowing this card can overclock to the speeds of the 5870 and get you the performance you're looking for...

    ati only downclocked it to get the TDP it wanted..they show you that the core can go higher and the cooler is rated to cool 400w compared to the 300w its producing now.
    this is true, in the review for the HIS card a few posts back, the temps were looking pretty good for the power output. however they had issues with OCing

  25. #375
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    To be able to see benefits from overclocking this card you're gonna need a fast, like really fast CPU
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

Page 15 of 16 FirstFirst ... 51213141516 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •