MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 354

Thread: Gigabyte TweaKING - Official info thread

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Aussie God
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    4,596
    Quote Originally Posted by hey View Post
    hi all guys; we just arrived home, because too high internet prices at the hotel i am just writing..

    Firstly and most importantly; i had great time! not because i win or loose but having really good time with old and new friends; i never change this to any winning possition or sth.
    And very very congrats the all buddies i know all are good tweakers but some time lucks cant be with you like us in 32m )

    let me write one by one

    first one is 32M

    i dont know if you checked our 32M scores it is 9m 19sec how can we have such a sucks score ?? here is the answer CPUTweaker was not working and we couldnt realise it cause it shows setting up is ok but not really setting up because we dont use cpuz at that contest we didnt run cpuz so we never thought that is possible so our real mem timings was such 8-15-15-31-..subs are also as high as auto from bios gives..

    first we thought some sevices may caused that so even we ghost the system back but we never realised the problem; okay we are guilty cause i was setting only cas from bios but here we had an unknown memory so that shoul be normal guys..

    well this is our bad luck in superpi 32m (we were easyly capable of 9m 8sec with 9-10-10 timings at home even at that setup without any tweak we get 9m 17sec,, check our 9m 19sec on the event ) )

    In case on 3DMARK01

    it is not a great results we got there my romanian friends know it let me just tell what i got at home at 211blck 121pcie vga@750-1587-1380, i was able to do 812xx; at 222bclck 125pci vga@750-1587-1380 with bad mem timingscas9-10 etc, i was able to do 81624. so in that contest we ran at 222bclkc 126pcie, vga@760-(1590to1625)-1338 we got 81590 it was not easy to let system see ssd at this pcie so not a good score

    i am really sorry that our romanian friends couldnt run their system in 3d; cause their vga was better than ours and i believe it was gonna be really good buddy challenge

    also thomas s unable to pass 200bclk cpu; petri and sampsa s d3d problem and i had thought that was a vga mem problem...and all guys that have such problems..

    with all my respects..

    hey

    and of course thanks to gigabyte for such an event
    Yea, some work for BIOS team on the BIOS, if selecting ONE setting manually in BIOS, such as CAS, of which you cant change in OS, all other timings are being ed....
    We also didnt notice this in good time, was our reason for running flat; 9-9-9-24 (Auto)

    We couldnt get past 111 PCI-e
    Hmm, dispite 210 vs. 211, you would have been no1 in 01SE, but Im impressed that the judge accepted that since only rule of event was 4000mhz, not 4000.1... you ran 4009mhz
    Roy (UK guy) stated this as being of very high importance on the stage.

    Once again hey, as I said in Paris, VERY VERY impressive run You suprised me alot, especially for not kicking my ass when I said "hey hey"
    Last edited by M.Beier; 10-29-2009 at 05:37 AM.
    Competition ranking;
    2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
    2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
    2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
    2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)

    Spectating;
    2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •