MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 383

Thread: **Official** Core i7 860/870 overclocking thread

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Wanna look under my kilt?
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Glasgow-ish U.K.
    Posts
    4,396
    Updated my BIOS to 158, which fixed vDroop

    I now idle at 1.30v and load at 1.33v Im sure I can tweak that down to 1.30v load. Temps are also a touch lower






    Quote Originally Posted by T_M View Post
    Not sure i totally follow anything you said, but regardless of that you helped me come up with a very good idea....
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    you sigged that?

    why?
    ______

    Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cochrane, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    Quote Originally Posted by K404 View Post
    Temps are also a touch lower.
    Your temps would be even lower if you used an updated version of Core Temp 0.99.5 that is able to read TJMax from the CPU.

    http://www.alcpu.com/CoreTemp/

    The latest version of RealTemp also reads these new CPUs correctly.

    http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/3/...alTempBeta.zip

  3. #3
    Wanna look under my kilt?
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Glasgow-ish U.K.
    Posts
    4,396
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    Your temps would be even lower if you used an updated version of Core Temp 0.99.5 that is able to read TJMax from the CPU.

    http://www.alcpu.com/CoreTemp/

    The latest version of RealTemp also reads these new CPUs correctly.

    http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/3/...alTempBeta.zip

    IMHO that just shows that the temps reported by all these programs is too open to mis-interpretation at hardware interrogation-> software level.

    Just because the software tells me the temps are lower... doesnt mean they *are*. Maybe the latest version will be more accurate... maybe it wont be, but relative to itself, any version used will show a change based on vCore improvements, higher MHz etc.

    I trust the contents of your avatar far more than any program
    Quote Originally Posted by T_M View Post
    Not sure i totally follow anything you said, but regardless of that you helped me come up with a very good idea....
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    you sigged that?

    why?
    ______

    Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cochrane, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    Quote Originally Posted by K404 View Post
    IMHO that just shows that the temps reported by all these programs is too open to mis-interpretation at hardware interrogation-> software level.
    That was a big problem in the early days which is why Intel started writing TJMax directly into all of their Core i7 / i5 CPUs which any software can read and use. Old versions of Core Temp and RealTemp had to guess at TJMax but Intel finally did us a favor and now both programs are able to read this information from each core of your CPU. When a line of processors is updated, software needs to be updated too.

    I trust the contents of your avatar far more than any program
    I like my temp gun but at full load running Prime or LinX, it's useless for reporting peak core temperatures. I think what Core Temp or RealTemp reports for Core 0 at full load on these new CPUs is very accurate and directly comparable to other Core i7 / i5 users.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •