But can you even see any difference in quality between 16x and 4x at 2560x1600 or even 1920x1200?Originally Posted by Chumbucket843
Just saying normally you wouldn't use 16x anyway cuz you won't see any difference so there's no reason to use it and then the 2GB is still unneccessary if showed a performance difference, so it doesn't change the point at all. 4x AA is more useful to test IMO.
Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 10-11-2009 at 08:43 AM.
Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs
If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks