Quote Originally Posted by Kaldor View Post
Charlie is usually full of , but he makes some very compelling arguments here:
http://www.semiaccurate.com/2009/10/...mi-boards-gtc/
Charlie made one big error, his statement that A1 is the first revision...

Anyone who knows a thing or two about chips knows A0 is the first revision. Anyone remember the Q6600 update, the G0(that's g zero)? If Charlie was correct in that assumption then that famous stepping would have been G1, not G0. These aren't counting the prototype samples which are just to test the features without making the full blown chip.

As such, kind of blows his argument clean out of the water in that regard, doesn't it?