Ian McNaughton goes out against The Way it's Meant to be Played

[aka1nas]

Lol at your post DilTech!
You basically say that ATI would have to "invest" (pay Ubi Soft so...) to make them correctly implement DX10.1 mode in A.Creed

Absolutely, it's called a vendor supporting their ing product. Why would you as a software developer want to work with advanced functionality (only available by one of the two vendors) when they won't give you the time of day with regards to support?

You can't really excuse AMD/ATI for "not being big enough" or not being in a financial position to provide partner support for their products. This is a basic part of being a technology vendor and they have failed miserably in both incarnations of the company.

[AbelJemka]

Absolutely, it's called a vendor supporting their ing product. Why would you as a software developer want to work with advanced functionality (only available by one of the two vendors) when they won't give you the time of day with regards to support?

Read the whole thread my friends, already respond about that!
A.Creed TWIMTBP games. End of story. Exactly the same story that Batman:AA.

You can't really excuse AMD/ATI for "not being big enough" or not being in a financial position to provide partner support for their products. This is a basic part of being a technology vendor and they have failed miserably in both incarnations of the company.

So reapeating again and again that AMD not supporting developper because some folks said this. There is already tons of link in this thread showing they do it.
Or just go here and you will see : http://game.amd.com/us-en/play_games.aspx
Just seems that Nvidia pay much more to gain support!

[mibo]

If you needed more proof on Nvidias business practices:

"...starting with the Release 186.00 of its graphics drivers - nVidia disabled PhysX if you have an ATI Radeon card in the same system."
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news...evelopers.aspx