MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 907

Thread: The E0 Q9550 SLB9V thread (finally!)

Threaded View

  1. 09-26-2009, 01:46 PM #11
    truehighroller
    truehighroller is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,118
    Quote Originally Posted by Unrealer View Post
    XP 32Bits SP3


    Your FSB Term is set to low, or Intelburntest is better optimized one of the two. I would look into that. Look at my numbers compared to yours. There shouldn't be that big of a difference in speed between me and you. Your CPU can be stable and still not be performing the way it should be. Bump up your FSB Term and fine tune your CPU GTL and test again and I bet it goes up. Not only that, your system will act alot more responsive once you hit the right FSB Term voltage for what speed you are at.


    Edit: Sorry I just noticed that I didn't post a pic of my testing with Intelburntest but, I am hitting 58.5 GFlops compared to your 42 and we are pretty close speed wise. I think you should be hitting 55 GFlops.
    Last edited by truehighroller; 09-26-2009 at 01:53 PM.
    _____________________________________________



    Rig = GA-P67A-UD3P Rev 1.0 - 2600K @ 5.2~GHz 1.5v~, 1.489~v Under Load - Swiftech Water Cooling - 2 X 4GB Corsair DDR3 2000Mhz @ 1868MHz~ 9,10,9,27 @ 1.65v~ - Asus 6970 @ 950MHz / 1450MHz - 3x Western Digital RE3 320Gb 16Mb Cache SataII Drives in Raid0 - Corsair HX 850w Power Supply - Antec 1200 Case - 3DMark 11 Score = P6234 - 3DVantage Score = P26237
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules