Dude.Originally Posted by saaya
you want clarkdale i3 igp benchmarks?
how about some real world tests instead of performance predictions, estimates and bold claims from the manufacturer? :P
785G performance my 4ss...
courtesy of our friends in hong kong:
this is a beta driver of course, even if a driver update within the next few months will kick this up and make it 250% faster than G45 accorss the board or even more than that... itll still be slow...
considering that this is still based on 965G and there has only been a 20% shader processor increase since G45, the perf boost is very nice...
but if you have sucky igp graphics and improve them by 250%... you still have sucky igp graphics...
That Chinese benchmark is flawed that it uses a driver that barely recognizes Clarkdale. G45 gets way more than 3.4 fps at everything low on Crysis. From the same site it shows 8-9 fps. If Clarkdale can 2.5x that then it can at least equal 9400.
You can't compare the result to anything other than Intel IGPs because the driver even cripples the G45.
Look here: http://global.hkepc.com/1865/page/11#view
G45 Crysis: 8.6
x 2.6 = 22 fps better than 9400.
If you want to make yourself relevant you are better off not fooling others first.
Look again: http://www.anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.aspx?i=3618&p=8
If they can manage 2-3x average in games it will be at least be on par with 785G.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks