Originally Posted by Jamesrt2004
meh you know what he means.. compare the percentage of people with normal C2D and C2Q's etc at normal 2.4~3.2 ghz compared to people with i7 @ like 4.2 lol
I like him and im sure a lot of other people would like to see results on say a Q6600 @ 3.2 or 3.6 or something a little more.. realistic for a lot of us
What the use of putting up a subjective review where the top 3 cards nicely smash into a CPU bottleneck again and again? The reason reviewers push their chips to high clocks is to get a differentiation between the cards' scores. Due to the nature of the majority of today's games, many high end cards will bottleneck at 1680 and even 1920 resolution in some cases even with an i7 @ 4Ghz let alone a C2Q.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks