im going to read a few more reviews, but it seems theres quite some variation for some reason... really odd... same hw, same software, same res, same drivers... but some people get notably diferent perf than others... 0_o
tpu is 32bit, which might explain why they got notably diferent results...
xbit anand and hwcanuucks are on vista 64 or win7 64...
i also think at least some results in tpus db are outdated and that might explain diferent results as well...
and yes, price perf 5850CF seems to be the best...
for benching 4890 3x CF might be the same or close though...
i doubt 2gb will be faster, why should it? its not any faster for current gpus...
and i hope we will see better 3rd party heatsink soon as well...
i hope so... even with the 5850 being more than 20% faster than a 4890 on average, im really surprised to see a 5850 cost almost 100$ more... but prices seem to vary as well, originally it was 299$, then 279$ and now some mentioned 249$? i think its 279$ and 4890s can be had to 190$, so theres quite a gap there...
huh?
4870 and 4890 both oced well...
what were def clocks for 4890? 850mhz?
and they clocked to close to 1ghz on air... hows that bad ocing?





Reply With Quote
Bookmarks