--lapped Q9650 #L828A446 @ 4.608, 1.45V bios, 1.425V load.
-- NH-D14 2x Delta AFB1212SHE push/pull and 110 cfm fan -- Coollaboratory Liquid PRO
-- Gigabyte EP45-UD3P ( F10 ) - G.Skill 4x2Gb 9600 PI @ 1221 5-5-5-15, PL8, 2.1V
- GTX 480 ( 875/1750/928)
- HAF 932 - Antec TPQ 1200 -- Crucial C300 128Gbboot --
Primary Monitor - Samsung T260
AMD (64 Viewing)
CPU's & Motherboards
Intel (113 Viewing)
CPU's & Motherboards
ATI (120 Viewing)
GPUs, Graphics Cards, and Drivers
Nvidia (3 Viewing)
GPUs, Graphics Cards, and Drivers
,am not the only one looking forward to new series
![]()
My Heatware
Originally Posted by some guy on internet
That's your problem right there. Just forget about how things look on paper as that's irrelevant.
Thanks a bunch 'postumus' for the benches. I'm so going to get this card.
Any word on the HD5770 performance?
CPU: Pentium 4(L6SB)> E4500>E6700>E8200>Q6700>i7 920>I5 750>2500K
GPU: Nvidia Ti 4200>ATI 9800 PRO>Nvidia 8600GT>8800GT SLI>GTX260>ATI HD4870>HD5770>HD6950
Crysis
Run #1- DX10 1920x1080 AA=16xQ, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 29.89
Just chews through the AA
Anyway it's back to work tmrw so I think my lil preview is over, thanks again guys for the helpful links, my small hd is now full of demo and benching material![]()
I got
26.6fps no AA
21.62fps 4xAA
1080p Very High
with GTX285 SSC + i7 @ 3.6ghz
nvidia 190 drivers Vista Ultimate x64
Postumus, how did your framerate increase with 16xQ? O_O
Also how did you set this in the game itself or the ATI Control Panel? The benchmark is based on the game values so you have to restart the game to set the settings. Forcing values at driver level seem to have zero effect (16QAA supersampling/16xAF did not change my framerate at all). I ask this because you have an AF setting and I don't see the game has any setting to change AF, only AA...
Since 16Q is not a native ATI AA but rather Nvidia it could be a bug and simply defaulting to the next highest (8x).
Last edited by astrallite; 09-20-2009 at 05:48 PM.
so whats the verdict
it's just a touch faster than 4870X2? correct
man that thing will just wipe the floor with nvidia in quadfire in vantage looking at those numbers so far
Again as I asked earlier in the thread, how? I run 2560x1600 2x AA at around 35-40fps during races maxed in-game options 16x AF, sometimes up to 45 if not many cars on screen, in the full NFS Shift game. My system is a GTX 280 1GB, i7 920 HT on @ 3.72ghz, 6GB DDR3, X-Fi XtremeGamer, Asus P6T X58. Something smells funny with your statement.
Last edited by GoldenTiger; 09-20-2009 at 07:38 PM.
Intel i7-2700k@ 4.7ghz (46x102)
Asus P8Z68 Deluxe GEN3
G.Skill 2x4gb RipjawX 2133 11-11-11-30
GTX 680 1220/7000
Corsair TX750W
Razer Lachesis w/ Razer Pro|Pad
1x160gb Seagate HDD, 2x1tb Seagate HDD
LG 22" 226WTQ & BenQ G2400WD
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
Can anyone tell if this image is a fake? It's supposedly a RV870 die shot, but the interesting thing is that people (tweakers, rage3D) are counting 2560SPs. It would make a lot of sense, given the rumors of TMSC 40nm problems, that even with the larger die ATI could get a great yield if they only enabled 62.5% of the compute and texturing resources on RV870. After yields improved they create a full on 5890 SKU to go against G300. On the other hand, we've already had a fake die shot coming out of chiphell.
That's a fake....
The real die shot was shown in the slides on ATI's strategy...
I know it's not the EXACT same engine, but throwing this out there - http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...0_8.html#sect2
That doesn't seem too far off. Looks like ~30-35% boost over a 4890 AND it's using beta drivers.
Now THAT's amazing. I don't think any other card could ever run 16xQ AA in Crysis and get playable framerates, never mind at 1920x1080
. Fantastic results.
Thanks for all the posting and testing you've done, I appreciate it.![]()
| Cooler Master 690 II Advanced | Corsair 620HX | Core i5-2500K @ 5.0GHz | Gigabyte Z68XP-UD4 | 2x4096MB G.Skill Sniper DDR3-2133 @ 2134MHz 10-11-10-30 @ 1.55V | 160GB Intel X-25 G2 | 2x 2TB Samsung EcoGreen F4 in RAID 1 | Gigabyte HD 7970 @ 1340MHz/1775MHz | Dell 30" 3007WFP-HC | H2O - XSPC RayStorm and Swiftech MCW82 on an MCP350 + XSPC Acrylic Top, XSPC RX240 and Swiftech MCR220 radiators.
yes its fake
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.p...postcount=3035
i just woke up -,-
CPU: Pentium 4(L6SB)> E4500>E6700>E8200>Q6700>i7 920>I5 750>2500K
GPU: Nvidia Ti 4200>ATI 9800 PRO>Nvidia 8600GT>8800GT SLI>GTX260>ATI HD4870>HD5770>HD6950
looks like that game is optimised better for ATI cards for superhigh res
Last edited by dinos22; 09-20-2009 at 10:42 PM.
" Business is Binary, your either a 1 or a 0, alive or dead." - Gary Winston ^^
Asus rampage III formula,i7 980xm, H70, Silverstone Ft02, Gigabyte Windforce 580 GTX SLI, Corsair AX1200, intel x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb, hp zr30w, 12gb corsair vengeance
Rig 2
i7 980x ,h70, Antec Lanboy Air, Samsung md230x3 ,Saphhire 6970 Xfired, Antec ax1200w, x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb,12gb Corsair Vengence MSI Big Bang Xpower
Bookmarks