Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 41

Thread: LSI 9260-8i Versus Areca 1231ML-2G

  1. #1
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029

    LSI 9260-8i Versus Areca 1231ML-2G

    Good morning all,

    General Observations –

    Controllers: Both the LSI 9260-8i and the Areca 1231ML-2G take about the same time to start up – seems like ~ 20-25 sec.
    Both seem very reliable, I did not encounter any errors or dropped arrays, which is saying something because I have significantly stressed both controllers over the last two days.
    Both controllers use the same cable connectors – I used both Highpoint and Areca (fan out) cables with no problem.
    The size of the 9260 is an advantage in tight places and it seemed that the 9260 ran cooler than the 1231.
    The 9260 has a couple advantages over the 1231 – pcie 2.0 bandwidth to the motherboard and price.
    The 1231 transfers data to the motherboard at only pcie 1.0 and is $200-300. more expensive than the 9260.
    The 1231 has a couple advantages over the 9260 – 2GB vs. 512MB onboard memory cache and the 1231 offers native SATA support.
    The 9260 is both a SAS and SATA controller in one, perhaps SAS via h/w and SATA via s/w? Could be.

    Drives - I use what SSDs I have on hand.
    The SSDs I have are perhaps not representative of the average SSDs that most people are now using.
    Obviously, your results will vary based on the drives you use.
    The Acard ANS-9010 is a DRAM based SSD and the Mtron Mobi 3000 is an early generation SSD based on SLC memory.
    Both are SATA (not SAS) drives.
    From a random access speed perspective the acard and the mobi are at somewhat opposite ends of the performance spectrum.
    The acard 9010 is extremely fast at random IO while the mtron mobi is extremely slow (4KB writes) - by today’s standards (about the same as a good platter drive).
    In sequential read writes, both are on the slow side – the acards come in at ~ 175/150MBps read/write per drive while the mobi’s read/write at ~ 100/80MBps per
    drive.

    Test set up – Test system is i7 965 on a Gigabyte Extreme mobo, 3x1GB G. Skill 2000/C9, 2xGTX295 Quad SLI.
    Boot drive via Mtron Mobi 16GB on the ich10r controller.
    All arrays are standalone on the controller (only the array to be tested is attached).
    Clocks - cpu @ 4.48 (35x128) ht off, memory @ 1792 (8-8-8-30), pcie @101

    LSI 9260-8i set up – I tested several variations and found that Biker’s set up was the best – see – http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=112
    All 9260 arrays are set to 64-stripe size (optimum for the arrays used in this test).

    Areca 1231ML-2G set up – After testing several variations I found that the default set up is the best.
    All 1231ML arrays are set to 64-stripe size (again optimum for the arrays used in this test).

    Acard array set up - Four acard 9010s, all set (via jumper) to raid 0.
    So 8xR0, each drive is 4GB (2 sticks of 2GB each DDR2).

    Mtron Mobi 3000 array set up – 4 16GB SSDs all in R0

    Summary of performance – Well, for the SSDs that I can bring to the test, I don’t think there is a clear winner here; both controllers have their strengths and weaknesses.
    The LSI 9260-8i has the best sequential read speed with the acard array and the best workstation IOps with the mobi array.
    The Areca 1231ML-2G has the best 4KB random speed for both arrays, the best sequential speed for the mobi array and the best workstation IOps for the acard array.
    See the iometer summary table below –



    Several benchmarks follow for each array on each controller - interesting that HDTach doesn't seem to work on the 9260 for reads.

    Benchmarks of Acard ANS-9010 8xR0 on LSI 9260-8i -



    Benchmarks of Acard ANS-9010 8xR0 on Areca 1231ML-2G -



    Benchmarks of Mtron Mobi 3000 16GB 4xR0 on LSI 9260-8i -



    Benchmarks of Mtron Mobi 3000 16GB 4xR0 on Areca 1231ML-2G -

    Last edited by SteveRo; 09-15-2009 at 01:10 AM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    398
    Thanks for posting this and doing all those test SteveRo!

    This is what we need: head-to-head testing

    There was mention of some firmware revisions for the LSI in another thread, were you using the most recent?

    So what is the plan for you with the controllers?

    Cheers
    Last edited by NeedMoMegaHurtZ; 09-13-2009 at 08:08 AM.

  3. #3
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedMoMegaHurtZ View Post
    Thanks for posting this and doing all those test SteveRo!

    This is what we need: head-to-head testing

    There was mention of some firmware revisions for the LSI in another thread, were you using the most recent?

    So what is the plan for you with the controllers?

    Cheers
    I think I'm using the latest f/w for all controllers/drives.
    The latest f/w for the 9260 is 57 as of yesterday this time.
    Also I should add - all test where done under xp-32.

  4. #4
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Grande Prairie, AB, CAN
    Posts
    6,140
    very nice! I don't suppose you did any appliation launching and/or photoshop?

  5. #5
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029
    Quote Originally Posted by lowfat View Post
    very nice! I don't suppose you did any appliation launching and/or photoshop?
    I haven't taken the time to figure out the application launching thing yet.
    I do have an old version of photoshop someplace but it would take some time to find it.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Infrastructure Eng
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,184
    Thank you for taking the time to conduct these tests and post your results!
    Less is more.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    2,542
    Great this is exactly what we need. Thanks!
    It would be great If you could find the time and do some head to head app runs and software install times between mobi arrays on both controllers!
    I guess that would pretty much settle the argument from the other thread.
    Quote Originally Posted by LexDiamonds View Post
    Anti-Virus software is for n00bs.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    1231 vs 9260
    800mhz vs 800mhz
    sata2 vs sata2
    hard vs soft
    @ real apps theres no comparison

    come on steve.. some real apps.. i know what the outcome is.. but do it for the ones that need more convincing..

    janus - i aint getting/spending another dime on sas controller.. just waste of money/time

  9. #9
    Worlds Fastest F5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Room 101, Ministry of Truth
    Posts
    1,615
    Thanks for testing

    As your results show the LSI card's 4k performance is hurt by it's SAS overhead (and possibly smaller cache) with higher latency meaning lower small file performance while the Areca falls behind at high sequential speeds due to it being PCI-e 1.0 and previous generation.

    Informative results indeed
    X5670 B1 @175x24=4.2GHz @1.24v LLC on
    Rampage III Extreme Bios 0003
    G.skill Eco @1600 (7-7-7-20 1T) @1.4v
    EVGA GTX 580 1.5GB
    Auzen X-FI Prelude
    Seasonic X-650 PSU
    Intel X25-E SLC RAID 0
    Samsung F3 1TB
    Corsair H70 with dual 1600 rpm fan
    Corsair 800D
    3008WFP A00



  10. #10
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    SteveRo

    Thanks for the comparisons.

    Could you please list the parameters you used for the iometer tests?
    I've got some Intel's I'd like to compare to your results using the LSI 9260-8i.

  11. #11
    SLC
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    2,795
    wow the 9260 is very slow. Reminds me of adaptec performance very much. Cant wait till Areca's new controllers whenever they are coming. Thanks for the testing!
    Last edited by One_Hertz; 09-13-2009 at 01:34 PM.

  12. #12
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029
    Quote Originally Posted by Biker View Post
    Thanks for testing

    As your results show the LSI card's 4k performance is hurt by it's SAS overhead (and possibly smaller cache) with higher latency meaning lower small file performance while the Areca falls behind at high sequential speeds due to it being PCI-e 1.0 and previous generation.

    Informative results indeed
    You just stated the summary I should have put at the end of the first post of this thread - well said, thanks.

  13. #13
    Xtreme CCIE
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    3,842
    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmV5 View Post
    1231 vs 9260
    800mhz vs 800mhz <--- IOP 34x vs new PPC. Apples to Oranges. 3.0GHz P4 != 3.0GHz i7
    sata2 vs sata2 <--- SATA2 vs SATA2 w/ SATA 3 support (won't change performance, but longevity)
    hard vs soft <---- I won't necessarily dispute this, but I must have missed the thread that proved the 9xxx series is software-based for SATA
    @ real apps theres no comparison <---- Proof?
    Questioned points above.

    I'm sure I missed something somewhere, but why are people suggesting this card does SATA in software and not hardware? I can't recall another SAS card before where this was the case, so I can't figure out why it would be now. It's just a different set of simple instructions to send to a drive, that's it really. If it turns out that it is done in software though I admit it's stupid... but in light of posts like the one I quoted where every other spec listed was questionable, I have to ask about this one.

    Looks like updated firmware is still needed at least though, IMO. But eh, the same goes for every controller when it was new. Seeing as Intel is on the bandwagon as well I'm sure we'll see it sooner or later.

    Edit: Can anyone with first hand experience let me know how hot that controller gets when idle and during load? What kind of cooling is required?
    Last edited by Serra; 09-13-2009 at 02:19 PM.
    Dual CCIE (Route\Switch and Security) at your disposal. Have a Cisco-related or other network question? My PM box is always open.

    Xtreme Network:
    - Cisco 3560X-24P PoE Switch
    - Cisco ASA 5505 Firewall
    - Cisco 4402 Wireless LAN Controller
    - Cisco 3502i Access Point

  14. #14
    Worlds Fastest F5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Room 101, Ministry of Truth
    Posts
    1,615
    It gets pretty warm.

    I'd say direct cooling would be mandatory unless you were running it in a server case with very high airflow.

    I haven't got a temperature monitor on it directly but i'd guess it would go way over 60 centigrade under load if left passively cooled, much like the Areca.

    It would be easy to strap or screw a 50 mm or 60mm low profile fan to it for direct cooling but this would make it dual slot.

    Personally I have installed in my board's bottom slot and have a 120mm underneath blowing straight at it which keeps it very well cooled.

    I would really like a temperature monitor implemented in the management software like with Adaptec cards, that would really be useful...
    Last edited by Biker; 09-13-2009 at 02:29 PM.
    X5670 B1 @175x24=4.2GHz @1.24v LLC on
    Rampage III Extreme Bios 0003
    G.skill Eco @1600 (7-7-7-20 1T) @1.4v
    EVGA GTX 580 1.5GB
    Auzen X-FI Prelude
    Seasonic X-650 PSU
    Intel X25-E SLC RAID 0
    Samsung F3 1TB
    Corsair H70 with dual 1600 rpm fan
    Corsair 800D
    3008WFP A00



  15. #15
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    I haven't experienced any heat issues with my card at all...it runs very nice and cool, but i also run a torture rack so there is nothing BUT airflow.
    I am glad to see some comprehensive testing between these two controllers, it is very informative!
    I have recently tested the 1680-ix vs lsi-9260-8i personally, but not in near as scientific a manner! Kudos to steve-ro for thorough documentation.
    Of course the 9260-8i did outstrip the 1680-ix by leaps and bounds, but the 1680 is SAS as well, so i think that is closer to comparing 'like' controllers.
    It is clear that the 1231 does impressively well with small files, due to its lower latency, but i also question how the future implementation of TRIM will affect the performance of these controllers..i think that the 9260-8i is designed for this added instruction set, and has headroom to implement it. This is a controller developed with SSD in mind! The 9260-8i is a controller that is designed with future improvements in mind, improvement that have not come to fruition yet. I dont think that the 1231 has that much more room to improve, frankly, it is only going to have a very limited amount of future usage.
    As to real world apps and the like i think that the people who are using these things care very little of real world usage. Who really uses these outside of us? We are the drag racers out here, and speed and being on the cutting edge is king(for some LOL)! They are both great controllers, i love areca, and when their 1800 series hits ill likely be one of the first in line to get it! BUT, this LSI is a damn fine piece of kit, and i refuse to believe that me getting 1.7 GB/S and NOT EVEN TOPPING THE CARD OUT stands for something impressive and special, something that thar 1231 cant even BEGIN to do!!! Imagine what this card will be capable of with NEXT GEN drives...it is a NEXT GEN controller...it is not optimized fully yet, because we arent even using it with what it is designed for yet!!
    does anyone feel me on this? LOL
    The last firmware revision gave me over 20 percent increase in small file transfer speeds, what will the next do?
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  16. #16
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    2,542
    Great responses guys! Very informative!
    Quote Originally Posted by LexDiamonds View Post
    Anti-Virus software is for n00bs.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    just running some vantage guys...gonan get some justice here i guarantee it!
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcmv=222666
    #9...oh and that is with the 512k stripe, which is not near as good as 1 MB!
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    140
    So basicly your test shows that if you are only going with a few drives the 1231ml would be the better choice, and for more drives the 9260 due to higher maximum throughput?

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Nelson, New Zealand
    Posts
    367
    The big drop in read performance in ATTO when the access pattern changes from 1*stripe size (64KB) to 2*stripe size (128KB) on both controllers is very odd.

    The random I/O perf on the 9260 is very disappointing. Makes me think I should wait until Q1 next year and upgrade to the Areca 1800 series instead -- assuming they can solve the small-block latency issues, of course.

  20. #20
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029
    Quote Originally Posted by Anvil View Post
    SteveRo

    Thanks for the comparisons.

    Could you please list the parameters you used for the iometer tests?
    I've got some Intel's I'd like to compare to your results using the LSI 9260-8i.
    I apologize for not getting back to you sooner -
    The settings I used in iometer are as you see them listed with everything else on default settings with each measurement run for 1 minute each.
    One minute for 4MB 100% sequential 100% read, queue set to 64
    One minute for 4MB 100% sequential 100% write, queue set to 64
    One minute for 4KB 100% random 100% read, queue set to 64
    One minute for 4KB 100% random 100% write, queue set to 64
    ...

  21. #21
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029
    Quote Originally Posted by AceNZ View Post
    The big drop in read performance in ATTO when the access pattern changes from 1*stripe size (64KB) to 2*stripe size (128KB) on both controllers is very odd.

    Maybe due to running out of cache?

    The random I/O perf on the 9260 is very disappointing. Makes me think I should wait until Q1 next year and upgrade to the Areca 1800 series instead -- assuming they can solve the small-block latency issues, of course.
    Where did you see Areca 1800 not till next year?
    That's dissapointing too.

  22. #22
    Worlds Fastest F5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Room 101, Ministry of Truth
    Posts
    1,615
    The Areca 1800 is going to be a SAS card which means FAIL as far as SATA SSD latency & 4k performance is concerned.
    X5670 B1 @175x24=4.2GHz @1.24v LLC on
    Rampage III Extreme Bios 0003
    G.skill Eco @1600 (7-7-7-20 1T) @1.4v
    EVGA GTX 580 1.5GB
    Auzen X-FI Prelude
    Seasonic X-650 PSU
    Intel X25-E SLC RAID 0
    Samsung F3 1TB
    Corsair H70 with dual 1600 rpm fan
    Corsair 800D
    3008WFP A00



  23. #23
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    I think that is signaling that it wil be awhile before we see any new sata controllers...
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  24. #24
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Nelson, New Zealand
    Posts
    367
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveRo View Post
    Where did you see Areca 1800 not till next year?
    That's dissapointing too.
    There was a video interview somewhere of a rep from Areca. He said it would be released Q1 2010, that they were using the Marvell chip, and that the price would be well over $1000 for the 8-drive version.

  25. #25
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Over the mountains and down in the valley
    Posts
    479
    Quote Originally Posted by AceNZ View Post
    There was a video interview somewhere of a rep from Areca. He said it would be released Q1 2010, that they were using the Marvell chip, and that the price would be well over $1000 for the 8-drive version.
    You mean the Saaya interview from a while back? I think that was a SAS controller he had in his hands. The man seemed to be very unsure of himself when asked about SSD's.
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    using a OCed quad for torrenting is like robbing your local video store with a rocket launcher.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •