Page 37 of 91 FirstFirst ... 27343536373839404787 ... LastLast
Results 901 to 925 of 2268

Thread: The ATI Radeon 5XXX Thread

  1. #901
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    SWEET
    Where's mah cookie?
    You were not supposed to see this.

  2. #902
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    CR:IA
    Posts
    384
    i don't know if this has been said yet, or not. but those new clear pictures have the vGPU controlled by a Volterra voltage controller.

    vGPU softmods out of the gate.

    which. IMO. is SWEET!
    Last edited by ChinStrap; 09-14-2009 at 10:11 AM. Reason: derp...
    PC-A04 | Z68MA-ED55 | 2500k | 2200+ XPG | 7970 | 180g 520 | 2x1t Black | X3 1000w

  3. #903
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    hahah!

    Well we have to wait for a review to say if the two groups communicate via sfr or not...so it's like the two groups of 800 could just as well have been one large group of 1600, and the thing would operate just the same, just that it was easier to start with two rv770 style groups and work from there? Theres nothing special about the diagram having dual rasterizers and heirachial z?

    After anand's review ill likely be sending u cookie
    Last edited by jaredpace; 09-14-2009 at 10:16 AM.
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  4. #904
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    800
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    SWEET
    NO QUOTING IMAGES
    If anyone here noticed, I believe those are die-shots of Cypress.

  5. #905
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Madrid (Spain)
    Posts
    352
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    SWEET
    NO QUOTING IMAGES
    Hey, that last picture about the "sweet spot strategy" and the market segments for each chip is wonderfully pretty with all those chips images and so, but what I read there is:

    Hemlock => 400-500$
    Cypress => 250-350$
    Juniper => 120-200$
    Redwood/Cedar => <120$

    What we know right now about Cypress prices is 300-450$, so what are AMD trying to say with this slide? That these former prices they have said are actually inflated because of the novelty?

  6. #906
    Muslim Overclocker
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,786
    As I read those numbers I thought to myself it has been a long time since I last saw a new gfx card from a competitor win in absolutely every single game tested. Until I saw wolfenstien numbers, then I was able to relax

    Awesome! A few more driver revisions it will hopefully win in that benchmark too.

    Thanks for sharing.

    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post

    My watercooling experience

    Water
    Scythe Gentle Typhoons 120mm 1850RPM
    Thermochill PA120.3 Radiator
    Enzotech Sapphire Rev.A CPU Block
    Laing DDC 3.2
    XSPC Dual Pump Reservoir
    Primochill Pro LRT Red 1/2"
    Bitspower fittings + water temp sensor

    Rig
    E8400 | 4GB HyperX PC8500 | Corsair HX620W | ATI HD4870 512MB


    I see what I see, and you see what you see. I can't make you see what I see, but I can tell you what I see is not what you see. Truth is, we see what we want to see, and what we want to see is what those around us see. And what we don't see is... well, conspiracies.



  7. #907
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Quote Originally Posted by slides
    Fast GDDR5 link training
    Allows voltage & clock switching on the fly without glitches
    Goodbye image flickering due to memory freq change á la RV770/RV740/RV790.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  8. #908
    The un-extreme XIP
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,149
    I spy a vt1165 vgpu regulator control chip, so rivatuner and others should already be able to adjust gpu voltage .

    i5 3570K@ 4.8GHz 1.32v, 32GB Gskill 1866, Gigabyte g1 sniper m3
    HD7970@1125/1575 stock voltage
    1TB F1+2*128GB Crucial M4
    Silverstone 450w, no case
    2560*1440@120Hz overclocked catleap
    Steelseries G6v2+5600dpi modded logitech trackball

  9. #909
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    Well we have to wait for a review to say if the two groups communicate via sfr or not...so it's like the two groups of 800 could just as well have been one large group of 1600, and the thing would operate just the same, just that it was easier to start with two rv770 style groups and work from there? Theres nothing special about the diagram having dual rasterizers and heirachial z?
    Nvidia's shaders are spread around the die too. Just because it's not all clumped together like in RV770 doesn't mean anything

    And yes there's nothing special about multiple rasterizers (well besides us finally getting them). Just like there's nothing special about having multiple ROPs or TMUs. Can we please let the dual-core rumours die? RV870 is a single-die, no SFR or AFR crapping monster.

  10. #910
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,062
    Quote Originally Posted by Farinorco View Post
    Hey, that last picture about the "sweet spot strategy" and the market segments for each chip is wonderfully pretty with all those chips images and so, but what I read there is:

    Hemlock => 400-500$
    Cypress => 250-350$
    Juniper => 120-200$
    Redwood/Cedar => <120$

    What we know right now about Cypress prices is 300-450$, so what are AMD trying to say with this slide? That these former prices they have said are actually inflated because of the novelty?
    $350 is a sweet price for the HD5870 considering how much the GTX 295 costs now, but I'm sure the price will be up a little more like when the previous gen first debut. I assume this is the price for the 1GB version, the 2GB might cost $70-$100 more. Much excited but I guess I still hold my breath and see what Nvidia has up their sleeves. Hopefully they're gonna open a big can of whoopass instead of a huge grain of salt.

    CPU: Core i7-2600K@4.8Ghz Mobo: Asus Sabertooth P67 Case: Corsair 700D w/ 800D window
    CPU Cooler:
    Corsair H70 w/ 2 GTs AP-15 GPU: 2xGigabyte GTX 670 WindForce OC SLI
    RAM: 2x8GB G.Skill Ripjaws PSU: Corsair AX850W Sound card: Asus Xonar DX + Fiio E9
    HDD:
    Crucial M4 128GB + 4TB HDD Display: 3x30" Dell UltraSharp 3007WFP-HC
    Speakers: Logitech Z-5500 Headphone: Sennheiser HD650

  11. #911
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,785
    Whoever said multi monitor support isn't important are fooling themselves. If the multiple head displays did d3d today then I wouldn't have had to buy that Matrox Triple Head 2 Go a few years ago...

    Gaming with 57" on screen real estate is a whole new experience. I play primarily FPS titles like cs source. Heck the 3 screen setup I'm using now carried me through several seasons of CAL IM back in the day... Peripheral vision in games is just something to behold and I wouldn't give it up for anything!

    Of course you need the hardware to drive the displays... I get sad when I have to go back to a single display because it runs badly or doesn't support 16x9. Crossfire or SLI is a requirement for my system.

    So I hope ATi does have some cards that can accelerate more than one display. It will open up the market to a whole new generation of gamers. My question is can these cards do multi monitor with CF enabled? I'll keep using my TH2go until then...
    Last edited by Vinas; 09-14-2009 at 10:24 AM.
    Current: AMD Threadripper 1950X @ 4.2GHz / EK Supremacy/ 360 EK Rad, EK-DBAY D5 PWM, 32GB G.Skill 3000MHz DDR4, AMD Vega 64 Wave, Samsung nVME SSDs
    Prior Build: Core i7 7700K @ 4.9GHz / Apogee XT/120.2 Magicool rad, 16GB G.Skill 3000MHz DDR4, AMD Saphire rx580 8GB, Samsung 850 Pro SSD

    Intel 4.5GHz LinX Stable Club

    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team

  12. #912
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Well I still think the shader group units are semi-independent and communicate with each other to render images exactly how two physically separate modern gpus render in sli/crossfire. There was so much talk of this on the asian BBS's I don't see how they could have just made it up and ran with it. It could all be wrong, but I still want to read a review explaining the rendering process. Apparently to you guys, largon & trinibwoy, it is no different than g80/g200. 2 weeks and then i can send cookie, trini you get nothing but a good laugh.



    edit - chopped up image compared 5850 to 5870... 81% to 100%. How to unlock the missing 160 shaders?!?!?!?!



    http://www.hwupgrade.it/forum/showpo...ostcount=10248
    Last edited by jaredpace; 09-14-2009 at 10:37 AM.
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  13. #913
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,023
    Guys, is it possible that those 160 shaders help with eyefinity and AA?

  14. #914
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    415
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    okay, then as you say the 5870x2 DOES go against the gtx295. current 295 price is $499, 5870x2 price set to be $599 at end of october.
    And it will be cheaper than MSRP when it hits the street, that's for sure, just like it was with any previous generation.
    In other words a $500-550 6870x2 will compete with ~$480 GTX295...

    But already the $399 5870 1gb single gpu card is destroying the $499 gtx295...
    Well, that's a stretch but I expect 5870 to be around $360 on the streets so it's definitely a good deal.

    So what are you saying? What is rediculous about what is happening?
    The ridiculous thing was that you guys called "only" 10% faster (5870>GTX295) when it's not even in the same class.

  15. #915
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    Well I still think the shader group units are semi-independent and communicate with each other to render images exactly how two physically separate modern gpus render in sli/crossfire. There was so much talk of this on the asian BBS's I don't see how they could have just made it up and ran with it. It could all be wrong, but I still want to read a review explaining the rendering process. Apparently to you guys, largon & trinibwoy, it is no different than g80/g200. 2 weeks and then i can send cookie, trini you get nothing but a good laugh.
    What in the world are you talking about? Every SIMD in every GPU is independent. Your're basing your theory on the fact that AMD showed two separate groups in an architecture diagram? So I guess this diagram makes you think there are 20 different GPUs rendering in crossfire?


  16. #916
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    SWEET
    NO QUOTING IMAGES

    If this information is true, the HD5870 will be a great card.
    Intel Core i7 940 2.9GHz OC @ 3.8
    G.SKILL PI Black 3GB DDR3 2000MHZ
    Nvidia EVGA X58 SLI MotherBoard
    2X BFG GTX295's in Quad SLI
    9800GT for dedicated PhysX
    TOPOWER 1200 Watts Power Supply SLI Ready!
    Western Digital SATA-150GB-Raptor
    2X Western Digital SATA-500GB-Caviar SE in RAID 0
    CM COSMOS S Custom Case
    2X Gateway XHD3000 30" Widescreen HD LCD Monitor

    Notebook: HP Pavilion dv9820us

    Work Laptop: IBM ThinkPad T400

  17. #917
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    Thats some ridiculous scaling. Forget the 5870. If the 5870x2 is only 150 more, then it is the card to get. Its more than double the performance of the 5850 and less than double the price. I am basing this off the performance of the 5870x2 comparison.

    For the most part the gtx 295 when 4x aa is used appears to be faster than the 5870. However at 8x it loses alot of times. At that performance, I can see NV next generation part being much much faster. It will still lose to the 5870x2 I think but I can see it being 50% percent faster than a single 5870(it will lose to a x2 because the 5870x2 appears to have 100% scaling).

    The reason I can see it being 50% faster is because the gtx295 has really conservative clocks on both the shader end and its main clock as well. If the 510 shader part is true and it is indeed a new generation, then I can easily see it 50% percent faster than a 5870.

    At that point, NV definitely has a chance because it give NV the opportunity for them to release a x2 part on their own that beats the 5870x2 by a rather significant margin. If NV is able to catch the single and dual gpu crown within 4 months of the 5870 release, then it could win this generation.

    Alot of speculation, but the 5870 performane gives alot of room for this to happen.
    Last edited by tajoh111; 09-14-2009 at 11:18 AM.

  18. #918
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    What in the world are you talking about? Every SIMD in every GPU is independent. Your're basing your theory on the fact that AMD showed two separate groups in an architecture diagram? So I guess this diagram makes you think there are 20 different GPUs rendering in crossfire?
    NO QUOTING IMAGES


    Since the House passed 100 to summarize it:

    We all know that RV870 is a native dual-core, MEM share, TMU sharing, etc. These hardware innovations is just the beginning, or rather in addition to hardware of the new technology, RV870 brings us the updated software in-depth , for example, CrossFire mode, specifically can refer to the savage major technical paper, I did not explain the response to this (http://bbs.chiphell.com/viewthre ... & extra = page% 3D1)
    RV870 by native dual-core hardware support, the biggest benefit is the CF model can be evolved from today's AFR for a more reasonable SFR (do not understand what AFR and SFR for us to look savage Great article,), SFR and thoroughly get rid of the PCI-E bandwidth bottlenecks leading to CF or SLI can not use the SFR of the constraints, CF no longer rely on driving on the optimization of 1 +1 is infinitely close to two and said, where everyone will be RV870 native dual-core architecture of the deep deep impress, at least in my case, native dual-core is my first time in years, felt playing card graphics technology, a major step forward.
    Go back to Crysis on the results, in fact, the RV870's Crysis performance can be regarded as a strong reason why the bounds of reason, but it can be regarded as lucky, because to say whether it is before the CF or SLI, the efficiency of both in Crysis is not high, RV870 just drill the use of technology, this SFR loopholes and completed card crisis, the role of Terminator, but I hope that everyone calmly RV870 performance, in other CF or SLI more efficient GAME in, RV870 impossible to think about Crysis so lucky, though it in terms of the total, RV870 architecture as pioneered the use of dual-core technology, combined with the many part of the shared framework, the core DIE or the ratio of power consumption and performance will be the same Performance Products the highest, which is beyond doubt.

    Lao Lao hastily said so much, would have wanted to test them on the RV870 article says, but I got fascinated by the RV870 architecture could not resist spraying a bit out, more content or waiting for me in the future release of the RV870 test, let us share the bar.
    Quietly asked a small problem, AFR to SFR does not seem to call it evolution, can only be called after the performance to a certain extent the development of an inevitable trend of bar

    CHIP has the original "Dual" Processor Unit, each PU contains 160 VLIW (vulgar understanding of the words Where there are two RV770 form a RV870), but certainly not in now with a simple package prices
    Where CrossFireX decker SLI are AFR (cross-frame rendering), image processing, 2 GPU Where】 【rotation exchange working, efficiency relates to the driver to complete a few quick, the error can not compensate for delay
    RV870 with generous SFR (split-frame rendering), image processing, professionals, all know that playing a three-color RGB images must be completed, SFR Where Through 1FPS on screen divided into a number of 8 * 8-32 * 32Pixel generous detailed map between the to carry out the same color with the nuclear deal as long as the Bandwidth咁sample is large enough, you can achieve the same RV770 generous GPUClock case is equal to +200% efficiency.
    (SFR consumption on the heaviest Where Bandwidth, RV870XT will spend the world's fastest generous GDDR5)
    The above messages are from the Mainland China's internal sources AMD

    Praytell why the hell would ATI make a "native dual core"? That doesn't even make sense with GPUs. If they are going to CF two GPUs on one die, they would be better off just making it one GPU. It'd be faster with less overhead and wouldn't cost any more to manufacturer.
    Basically instead of making a mega cores with 1600 SP you make two 800 SP cores on the same die with fast inter connects to support SFR. This way you can concentrate on refining process tech for the lower trans count 800 SP cores. It will not be as fast as a native 1600 SP chip but it will be easier to produce. And it appears that the cores share a single memory controller. So I guess instead of calling it dual core it may be better to call it dual shader mega clusters.
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  19. #919
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949


    FINALLY!

    The bad news is that probably the low idle power consumption is because the card clocks the memory down a lot, 100-300MHz, not because ATI has done significant improvements in the memory controllers. We'll see.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  20. #920
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    225
    To me it seems 5xx is a much of victory to AMD as 4xxx was , it shows some steady growth and it will be a victory in the market as well for few month afterwards only time will tell , but Green has been producing huge chips with alot proprietary adds and ends , no matter what anyone says and they had to learn that lesson with 4xxx and the chances are all that we will see is a shrink with some minor improvements .As to someone saying that NV is being quite , no its not they been spewing propaganda ever since 5xx talk began .As for Eyefinity i really dont care as long as it doesn't take up to much die space .


    Edit : ohh yeah "Voltera" voltage controllers are indeed sweet
    Last edited by ~CS~; 09-14-2009 at 11:20 AM.
    My Heatware
    Originally Posted by some guy on internet
    That's your problem right there. Just forget about how things look on paper as that's irrelevant.

  21. #921
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    los angeles
    Posts
    387
    hey guys


    LOL
    Seti@Home Optimized Apps
    Heat
    Quote Originally Posted by aNoN_ View Post
    pretty low score, why not higher? kingpin gets 40k in 3dmark05 and 33k in 06 and 32k in vantage performance...

  22. #922
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    Quote Originally Posted by Newblar View Post
    hey guys
    NO QUOTING IMAGES

    LOL
    Rhhhhoooo

    3-XFire HD5870 on the road for the same price

  23. #923
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    752
    I wanna see 5870 X2 to the gtx380 (or even gtx395). Which ever wins (most likely 5870x2) will be my next buy.

    I'm not counting on the gtx395 though... if it does get released... it will get released months after words like the gtx295 and will cost significantly more

    so my next buy is looking to be a 5870 x2 massive step up from my gtx285 if these benchs are true

    hopefully won't be too bottlenecked on a q9550 @ 4 ghz... anyone think it will be?

  24. #924
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    343
    Hey Guys, I just wanted to give me two cents and also get your opintion on my future upgrade. These news card do sound really good. I am currently running nVidia 8800GT and I wanted to know what Version of the Card would you guys recommend me upgrading too. I am a picky person. I do play gaming on my PC, Blu-Ray, and other Cool Stuff.

    I also wanted to ask that I was playing NFS Most Wanted on my 360 and there were alot more Graphics then I have currently on my PC. I play the same game on my PC and there are a lot Graphic Elements that are missing. Does this means that my Graphic Card isn't as powerful as my 360. Your Thougts Please?

    Josh
    CM HAF 922 Case| Corsair 620HX Power Supply| Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 at 3.2GHz | Asus Maximus Formula SE Motherboard| 8GB G-Skills System Ram | Sapphire 5850 Graphic Card | Samsung 46" LCD TV (My Monitor) | Asus Xonar D2X PCI-E Sound-Card | 4 WD Hard-Drivers Total Storage 2.4TB | Logitech DiNovo Keyboard and Logitech MX Revolution Mouse| Logitech Z-5500 Digital Sound System | And So On...

  25. #925
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    706
    nicely spotted mate lovely jubbly


    Quote Originally Posted by ChinStrap View Post
    i don't know if this has been said yet, or not. but those new clear pictures have the vGPU controlled by a Volterra voltage controller.

    vGPU softmods out of the gate.

    which. IMO. is SWEET!





Page 37 of 91 FirstFirst ... 27343536373839404787 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •